CFIR Dallas, TX

Google
WWW CFIR Dallas

Saturday, May 22, 2004

Del Rio News-Herald

Del Rio News-Herald



Contact our news staff at (830) 775-1551.

Immigrant's death under investigation

By Karen Gleason
The News-Herald

Published May 23, 2004

An autopsy has been requested to determine what caused the death of a young man whose body was found Friday on a ranch northwest of the Del Rio city limits.

The body was located on the Nixon Ranch northwest of Del Rio Friday afternoon by U.S. Border Patrol agents who had been alerted to its presence by authorities in Ciudad Acu–a, Coah., Mexico, according to Lt. Larry Pope, who heads the Val Verde County Sheriff's Office criminal investigations division.

Pope said he was told that the man, believed to be in his early 20s and a resident of the Mexico state of Oaxaca, was an undocumented immigrant who illegally crossed the Rio Grande with two traveling companions, a man and a woman. Pope said the woman identified herself to authorities as the dead man's common-law wife. Pope said the woman told immigration authorities in Mexico that she and the other man turned around and went back to Ciudad Acu–a after her common-law husband died.

After the pair alerted authorities in Mexico, those authorities called the Mexican Consulate in Del Rio, which in turn notified the U.S. Border Patrol here. The man and woman then were escorted back to the United States to assist Border Patrol agents in locating the body.

"After the witnesses to the death were returned to Mexico, the Border Patrol notified the Val Verde Sheriff's Office," Pope said Saturday.

Pope said all of the information he had received about the case is as yet unsubstantiated by witness interviews. Pope also said all of the identification the dead man carried was removed by the man and woman who were with him when he died, and that they took that identification back to Mexico with them.

Pope said the man was pronounced dead by Justice of the Peace Precinct 2 Joey Gonzalez, who ordered the autopsy.

Tyson's Fires Illegal Aliens

And....this includes everyone who hires an illegal alien nanny, housekeeper, gardner, etc. They are equally guilty of violating federal immigration law (Employer Sanctions) and should also be prosecuted.
Rest assured that YOU as an individual patriot can be incredibly effective!
ACTION I: CCIR offers a simple adhesive label that many have used most effectively. It states, "EMPLOYING ILLEGAL ALIENS IS A VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW - EMPLOYER SANCTIONS (Sec. 274A [8 U.S.C. 1324a]a).
When we see gardeners, construction workers, roofers, housekeepers, nannies, etc. in our neighborhoods who cannot speak or understand English, we simply put one of these labels on the homeowner's front door.
Guess what? The majority of the time, we do NOT see these workers again.
ACTION II: When contacting companies for work needed in your home or on your property, ask the employer if they hire illegal aliens. The answer will be NO. Say, fine but you will ask to see ALL the employees' "papers" before they start work. ONLY those who employ citizens or legit immigrants will even continue the conversation.
ACTION III: Advise those who knock on your door asking for work that you want to see their "papers" before you agree. Watch most of them "disappear"!
ACTION IV: Go to the day-labor centers and concentrate on pics of LICENSE PLATES of those who are hiring and, if possible, a pic of the vehicle driver. Watch these scumbags split - - 0 to 60mph in seconds!



------- Forwarded message follows -------
From: "laura"
To: "Laura L. Leighton"
Subject: Fw: INS{VA} Tyson Foods fires 42 undocumented workers
Date sent: Thu, 20 May 2004 22:29:41 -0700




It's possible Tyson, apart from having the last lawsuit found out about illegals' lawsuit against Wal-Mart under the pretext of being "independent contractors".

----- Original Message ----- From: W.G.E.N.
To: idzrus@earthlink.net
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 12:59 PM
Subject: INS{VA} Tyson Foods fires 42 undocumented workers



Every employer in America should be held accountable for KNOWINGLY hiring ILLEGAL INVADERS.
We all know that false documents can be hard to detect with the technology of producing false documents but there are ways to verify some of that information if an employer is dedicated to hiring only LEGAL Americans. Perhaps a notice on the job application form that hiring will only take place AFTER verification is received from the INS or SSA of the documents provided in the application. Another requirement would be that the applicant must speak ENGLISH! If the applicant is even a tad bit suspicious - ask for citizenship papers. There is NOTHING WRONG with protecting yourself from the crime of hiring an ILLEGAL. It may take a bit more time but when the stake of America is at risk here - it should be worth it to every employer. Put some responsibility on the people in Human Resources to make sure those hired are LEGAL. I have worked in those departments and verifying info on the I-9 forms isn't all that hard to do if you are sincere in hiring only LEGAL citizens.

Now for the street corner hiring halls - get out there with cameras - take lots of pictures - get faces - get license plates with faces so no one can deny they are the guilty critters helping to destroy America for a few pieces of silver (profit). This is war, folks, and the future of America is at stake here - don't forget it.
When you get those pictures make lots of copies and send them off to all your local media with the info of when, where, why and ask them to publish those pics for all to see. Soon, the ILLEGALS and the crooked employers will figure out they have to move on - follow them if you can and repeat this operation. Put heat on the property owners who allow this too.

Keep in mind the uproar those pictures coming out of Iraq have caused. PICTURES WORK!
People who can't read understand pictures.

Jackie Juntti
WGEN idzrus@earthlink.net


http://www.fredericksburg.com/News/apmethods/apstory?urlfeed=D82LRUG00.xml


Tyson Foods fires 42 undocumented workers

The Associated Press
HARRISONBURG, Va.

Tyson Foods Inc. has fired 8 percent of its workforce at its Harrisonburg plant, all immigrant workers who could not verify their employment documents, company officials said.

The company earlier this month suspended 63 workers and gave them until last Friday to prove their legal status in the U.S., or face permanent dismissal.

By Monday, 42 workers were fired for submitting falsified employment documents, said company spokeswoman Libby Lawson. She said the rest were found to have proper paperwork and were allowed to return. Two, however, decided to quit and find other employment, she said.

"We were very disappointed," Lawson said.

Tyson Foods discovered problems with the employees' work documents during a routine audit about three weeks ago. The 42 fired workers had used Social Security numbers that had originated in Puerto Rico, Lawson said. All 63 questioned have Latino surnames, but their nationalities were not known.

Lawson said once the company's investigation is complete, the company would forward its report to the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

The Tyson corporate office conducts audits of its hiring process at least once a year, selecting the location at random. Lawson said it would be a daunting task for the Springdale, Ark., company to perform an audit for all of its 120,000 employees.

The Harrisonburg plant employs 550 workers and processes 660,000 chickens a week for the fast-food and deli markets. Lawson said the firings were necessary to abide by the law, and will be costly for the company and local economy.

However, immigration problems are nothing new for the chicken giant.

An audit in March found 450 undocumented workers at a Tyson meatpacking plant in Dakota City, Neb., of which at least 250 were fired.

Last year, Tyson Foods and five of its managers were acquitted of charges linking them to an immigrant-smuggling scheme. One manager pleaded guilty to related charges in 2002.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. [Ref.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
... The purpose of WGEN is to encourage you to THINK
Washington Grassroots Electronic Network (WGEN) Email Division
WGEN Board http://www.voy.com/19385 Please post your thoughts to the WGEN board
WGEN holds no polls, sends no attachments to list mail & is not a discussion list.
To Subscribe (or unsubscribe) send email to WGEN idzrus@earthlink.net - indicate the state you live in.
--- Grassroots Granny http://home.earthlink.net/~idzrus/index.html

Great News resources:

Team America http://www.teamamericapac.org/
Glenn Spencer's American Border Patrol http://www.americanpatrol.com/
The American Resistance http://www.theamericanresistance.com/
Lewis News http://www.lewisnews.com/main.asp back on-line again!
News With Views http://www.newswithviews.com/
Covenant News http://www.covenantnews.com/blog/
Sierra Times http://www.sierratimes.com/
Idaho Observer http://www.proliberty.com/observer/
Sonoran News http://www.sonorannews.com/
The Citizens Review On-Line http://www.citizenreviewonline.org/current_news.html
Buy AMERICAN - http://www.buyamerican.com/
** Judicial Forum http://www.judicialforum.org/
How To Buy American |||||| http://www.howtobuyamerican.com/


"Federal Funds" - "Matching Funds" - "State Funds" these are all fraudulent terms as government in America has no funds of any kind except those funds it first takes from the private citizen, you and me. All these so-called "funds" are those monies government has creamed from excessive taxes (handling fees) which they then turn around and *gift* us with (including ropes with a hangman's noose) to coerce another level of government to hang us with. All that *sugar* they dangle in front of the eyes of the greedy tax hogs is filled with poison but it isn't tasted until it is too late. A spoonful of sugar helps the poison go down.

We would all be much better off if we would handle all projects at the local level and didn't swallow all that *sugar*. Stop sending your resources to Washington DC for them to siphon off those "handling/laundering fees" before 'gifting us' with those phoney 'matching funds'

It is these same siphoned off funds they are handing over to ILLEGAL INVADERS, assisting in the overthrow of America.



------- End of forwarded message -------
--
Barbara Coe
Chairman
California Coalition for Immigration Reform
http://www.ccir.net

One Reporter's Opinion: 'Illegal' Health Risk

One Reporter's Opinion: 'Illegal' Health Risk

One Reporter's Opinion: 'Illegal' Health Risk
George Putnam
Saturday, May 22, 2004
It is this reporter's opinion that the Congress of the United States acted tragically against America's best interests when it shot down Dana Rohrabacher's illegal alien medical bill, HR 3722. Powerful interests representing hospitals, pharmaceuticals, etc., acted against us.

All the bill asked was that illegal aliens - violators of our sovereignty - be identified as illegal!


But this is a sad, continuing story and particularly in those states that border on Mexico, where we witness a steady, silent, pervasive invasion of the U.S. by an unarmed army carrying an assembly line of diseases into the heart of America.

And it grows unabated as an average of 2,000 illegals cross over U.S. borders without being screened for diseases.


It is a silent invasion with deadly consequences to America and our children!


Recently I read a brilliant dissertation, "IMMIGRATION'S SILENT INVASION, DEADLY CONSEQUENCES." It was researched by Stephany Gabbard, a registered nurse, and Frosty Wooldridge, former U.S. Army Medical Service Corps officer, teacher and author.

They offer a frightening study of how the hordes of illegals invading our nation have reintroduced tuberculosis, leprosy, smallpox and Chagas' disease. (Chagas is a nasty parasitic bug common in Latin America, where 18 million people are infected and 50,000 die annually.)


The most serious is a MDR (multi-drug-resistant) tuberculosis, with a higher death rate than cancer. The deadly bacteria becomes airborne when an afflicted person coughs.

It is estimated that each victim infects 10, 20 or more people with a time-bomb lasting effect.

To make matters worse, in excess of 7,000 new cases of leprosy have been diagnosed in the U.S. in the past three years. Chagas, called the "kissing bug disease" because the parasite favors the face as a root of infection, damages the heart and intestines and even threatens our blood supply; hundreds of blood recipients may be silently infected. And there is dengue fever, polio, cases of malaria ... and God only knows what other diseases.


The health-care crisis spreads daily across our nation and is not confined to the border states. The Queens, N.Y., Health Department found 81 percent of new tuberculosis cases among illegals and foreign-born people, who have an eight times higher incidence of TB. In fact, two-thirds of the cases of TB brought into the U.S. originated in three countries: Mexico, the Philippines and Vietnam.


Take the case of Miguel, who worked in construction on a subway renovation and was able to change his status to "legal permanent alien." Miguel is infected with tuberculosis. But this did not stop the federal government from issuing Miguel a health waiver under the Immigration and Nationality Act. That permits him to have a green card, though his disease made him inadmissible for the waiver. Miguel continues to move about at will, spreading TB wherever he goes.


Or take the case of a young worker in Santa Barbara, Calif., who refused to take his medication and has spread 56 known cases of TB to fellow workers.


Illegal aliens continue pouring over the borders, their bodies carrying hepatitis A, B and C, tuberculosis, leprosy, Chagas' disease, smallpox and more. Yet the Congress of the United States will not act effectively to secure our borders.

It's time to stop illegal immigration by whatever means necessary - U.S. troops, National Guardsmen, mass deportations and the arrest of employers who hire illegal aliens. I say hit 'em where it hurts the most: Remove their source of profit! And make the punishment fit the crime.



Related Links:
http://www.michnews.com/artman/publish/article_2051.shtml


The legendary George Putnam is 89 years young and a veteran of 69 years as a reporter, broadcaster and commentator ... and is still going strong on KSPA-AM, 12 noon to 2 p.m. Pacific Time - simulcast all over the world on the CRN Radio Network.

Arrests Made in Meth Distribution Ring

Carthage Press: News Index

Arrests made in meth distribution ring

By Dennis W. Sowers, Of The Press Staff
A three-month drug conspiracy investigation resulted in the arrests of six people by the Jasper County Drug Task Force last week on federal grand jury indictments.

The task force, along with the help of the Carthage Police Department, Joplin Police Department, Southwest Drug Task Force and the Jasper, Newton and Barton County sheriff's departments, arrested three people at the Motel 6 in Joplin and three were arrested who were already in custody.

The investigation focused on the distribution of methamphetamine in the Jasper County area. During the course of the investigation approximately $110,000 in cash and 14 firearms were seized. A portion of the cash will return to the JCDTF to be used in future investigations.

Mark Walker, 43, a former Carthage resident with a current address of 6374 Hwy. 43, Joplin, was arrested on two counts of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. Melanie Fortner, 38, a former Carthage resident with a current address of 6374 Hwy. 43, Joplin, was arrested on two counts of possession with intent to distribute. Juan H. Gonzalez, also a former Carthage resident who is presently residing at the Motel 6, was arrested on one count of possession with intent to distribute. All three were arrested without incident.

"All these people kind of showed up all at once," said Det. Randee Kaiser of the Jasper Country Drug Task Force. "We kind of fell into things and we figured out what the connection was.

"We got them pretty much in the initial stages, which is a good thing."

Manuel Villareal, 46, Joplin, who was once a Carthage resident, was already in custody at the U.S. Marshall's Office in Springfield. He was arrested on two counts of possession of a controlled substance for sale, one count of illegal alien unlawfully in the U.S., one count of previously deported illegal alien returning to the U.S., one count of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a conspiracy and one count of conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance.

Brian Valentine, 34, Joplin, previously in custody at the Jasper County Sheriff's Department, was charged with three counts of possession of a controlled substance and one count of conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance.

Olegario Villareal, 24, Joplin, was arrested for one count of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance. He was already in custody at the Newton County Sheriff's Department.

All six of the suspects were were indicted by a grand jury in Springfield. Count one alleges that all defendants conspired to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine between February and May 6. Count nine would require Villareal-Amarillas to forfeit any proceeds, including $78,870 seized from him on March 17.

Motels became the focus of the investigation as the suspects use them as vehicles to distribute drugs.

"It offers a little anonymity -- being in a motel as opposed to a permanent residence," Kaiser said. "For someone on the move, it's easier to go that route. They can pack up and move to another motel to avoid detection by police very easily.

"Several of the group, their only residence was motels. They had been living in motels the last several months."

Kaiser said it was the combined cooperation of several hotels and motels that helped lead to the arrests.

The former Carthage patrolman also said the whole project would not have been possible without the help of cooperating agencies who did reports and surveillance and served search warrants. He said the task force looks good in making the arrests but that "without their help we just wouldn't have been able to get it done."

Kaiser said that the federal indictments were an indication of the seriousness of the crime but not a signal that the task force's work was done.

"Each time you've taken a gram off the street you've made a dent," Kaiser said. "If that puts you one step closer to solving the problem, I don't know. I don't know if you ever go down that road."

Progress in RICO

May 20, 2004


--Similar aims in Rohrabacher bill and FILE's LA County suit
--Howard Foster's work on RICO proceeding well


Similar aims in Rohrabacher bill, FILE's LA County suit

Tuesday, Congress failed to pass a bill (H.R. 3722) introduced by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher of California that would have required hospitals to request citizenship, immigration status, and other information from aliens in order to receive funds under the "Undocumented Alien Emergency Medical Assistance" portion of the Medicare Prescription Drug Act.

While the bill failed, Congressman Rohrabacher has done the country a service by bringing attention to the widespread disregard for laws limiting access to non emergency public health care by those illegally in the United States.

The FILE suit currently active in Los Angeles Superior Court would, if successful, compel the county to seek reimbursement from the sponsors of legal immigrants for those same services. Such a ruling, it is hoped, would accomplish by court order essentially what the Rohrabacher bill sought to do, i.e., require public service providers to collect data on all aliens, to keep records, and to make the information available to authorities.

There is a status conference on the FILE suit scheduled for June 8 in Los Angeles. FILE members interested in learning more about this important effort are urged to contact me.

H.R. 3722
http://fileus.com/dept/healthcare/index.html

Anderson v Los Angeles DHS
http://fileus.com/dept/healthcare/lacounty/index.html


Foster having success with RICO application to illegal hiring schemes

Member attorney Howard Foster, Johnson & Bell, Ltd., Chicago, IL, has provided copies of the favorable decisions in two of his recent cases litigating violations under RICO of the INA provisions making it illegal to hire illegal aliens.

Howard is the country's leading litigator in this promising area of the law, and his recent successes are encouraging.

When Congress expanded the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) in 1996 to include certain violations of federal immigration law (chief among them the law against hiring illegal aliens), it handed the American people a powerful law enforcement tool. [Under RICO, an American citizen or law abiding business owner who suffers damages due to the illegal hiring practices of an employer or competitor may bring suit. If found in violation, the employer or competitor is liable for triple damages, attorneys' fees, and costs.]

It was to safeguard this promising enforcement tool and efforts like Foster's that FILE filed the motion to intervene in the New Jersey case, Zavala v Wal-Mart, a case in which the plaintiffs are seeking damages under RICO. In Zavala, the plaintiffs are not the American citizens or law abiding competitors whose wages or profits may have been driven down by Wal-Mart's alleged illegal hiring scheme, the plaintiffs are the illegal aliens arrested in the Wal-Mart raids last year. FILE's motion asks the court to dismiss the plaintiff's RICO claims.

WILLIAMS ET AL. v MOHAWK INDUSTRIES
MENDOZA ET AL. v ZIRKLE FRUIT CO. ET AL.
http://fileus.com/dept/hiring/index.html

CIS Backgrounder (Micah King)
http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/back1103.html

_______________________________
Craig Nelsen
Friends of Immigration Law Enforcement
310 6th St. 2nd Flr.
Washington, DC 20003
202 543 2323

Immigrant Workers Targeted By New Scam

Immigrant Workers Targeted By New Scam

In a KXAN exclusive, News 36 looks at the investigation underway into a string of criminals who've come up with a surprising new way to rob you.

Arrest warrants show some Austin thieves are using prostitutes to lure victims in so they can attack and rob them.

There is a specific community here in Austin that's often the target of these robberies -- undocumented immigrants because they are less likely to tell police about it.

"Right now this is only a few cases," Director of Office of Immigrant Concerns Leo Anchondo said.

There are thousands of cases of immigrants who've been robbed in Austin.

"I would say one of every three clients that we see has been victimized in any way," Anchondo said.

Anchondo has never seen a case like this. According to arrest warrants, two immigrants claim they were robbed at gun point by two prostitutes and two men.

They say "the females had entered their apartment through their unlocked front door, uninvited and offered them sex." The men refused and told police within seconds two black men barged into the apartment with guns and robbed them of nearly $1,000.

"I was a little surprised by the level of creativity to attack this community," Anchondo said.

Anchondo says the immigrant community is often attacked, even street ice cream vendors.

"They just take their money and run," Anchondo said.

Nineteen-year-old Francisco Javier of Mexico says he knows of at least five different vendors who've been robbed.

"I think that it's bad that they're doing that. They should go and work instead of robbing," Javier said.

In this latest robbery, police have arrested and connected one of the prostitutes to other criminals who "are suspects in several other immigrant robberies. One is in jail for attempted capital murder for a separate case in which he robbed and shot a person after using a prostitute to lure that victim in."

"I think that now that we are aware of this new trend in crime we would make an effort to get it out to the community that we serve," Anchondo said.

Austin Police did not want to comment about the investigation and could not give us any mugshots of the suspects because they continue to look into the possibility of more victims of this latest scam.

Meanwhile the Office of Immigrant Concerns says you should be concern because crimes like this affect everyone.

AP Wire | 05/20/2004 | Miami immigration worker accused of taking bribes

AP Wire | 05/20/2004 | Miami immigration worker accused of taking bribes

Posted on Thu, May. 20, 2004





Miami immigration worker accused of taking bribes

Associated Press


MIAMI - A federal immigration worker provided forged documentation stamps and passports to ineligible illegal aliens in return for cash bribes, according to a grand jury indictment released Thursday.

Gudiela Sibori, an employee of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, accepted $7,900 for seven forged Alien Documentation Identification Telecommunication stamps purchased by a government informant, the indictment said.

The stamps are placed on an immigrant's passport when they arrive in the United States and are temporary proof of lawful permanent residence. The stamps allow its bearer to get a driver's license and Social Security card.

Sibori also is accused of providing altered, forged passports that contained the stamps to illegal aliens who were ineligible to receive them, an affidavit filed May 7 said.

She was in custody on Thursday, but it was not known when she was arrested, if she had been issued bond or if she has a lawyer.

Sibori faces up to 15 years in prison if convicted of taking bribes in return for the stamps, and 20 years in prison if convicted of providing and misusing the passports.

Immigrant Sensitive GOPers Facing Tough Times from Conservatives

Caribbean News details

Immigrant Sensitive GOPers Facing Tough Times From Conservatives For Position

WASHINGTON, D.C., Fri. May 21: Republican congressmembers all around the country are having to answer tough questions when it comes to immigration and where they stand, as they battle primary election challengers in their home states.

In conservative states around the nation, liberal and immigrant sensitive Republican congressmembers are being chastised for supporting legalization of the undocumented, a Washington Times report recently discovered.

The support is being equated with support for amnesty for “illegals” and being used to shore up opposition against the incumbent representatives.
Rep. Christopher B. Cannon, a Utah Republican and a prominent legalization supporter is among those feeling the fall-out for his support of undocumented immigrants working in some agricultural areas to gain legal status.

Cannon recently failed to win the required 60 percent of the vote at a Republican nominating convention a little more than a week ago and now faces a primary in June against Matt Throckmorton, a former state legislator who is running hard on the immigration issue.

In Arizona, the less conservative GOPers, Rep. Jim Kolbe and Rep. Jeff Flake, are also facing the fire for their support of a broad guest-worker program that would allow a path to citizenship for most illegal aliens in the United States.

Kolbe is being challenged by state Rep. Randy Graf while Flake will face Stan Barnes.

All of the challengers say the support amounts to amnesty for illegal behavior. Groups like the controversial, ProjectUSA, which was based in New York and then fled to Utah, are fanning the flames, putting up billboards with stark messages such as "Congressman Chris Cannon wants amnesty for illegal aliens."

And the Coalition for the Future American Worker paid for radio spots to spur up anger against Cannon’s liberal support.

But Cannon, according to the Washington Times, is standing his ground, stating recently, "The more we talk to folks, the better it is, and they understand we're not talking about amnesty — we're not talking about bringing millions of folks into the U.S."

And all three argue there is a need to fill jobs and legalize those who are undocumented here in the interest of national security.

Now it’s left to be seen whether they will hold their ground and stay true to their principles when the election day comes around. – Hardbeatnews.com

Caribbean News details

Caribbean News details

Immigrant Sensitive GOPers Facing Tough Times From Conservatives For Position

WASHINGTON, D.C., Fri. May 21: Republican congressmembers all around the country are having to answer tough questions when it comes to immigration and where they stand, as they battle primary election challengers in their home states.

In conservative states around the nation, liberal and immigrant sensitive Republican congressmembers are being chastised for supporting legalization of the undocumented, a Washington Times report recently discovered.

The support is being equated with support for amnesty for “illegals” and being used to shore up opposition against the incumbent representatives.
Rep. Christopher B. Cannon, a Utah Republican and a prominent legalization supporter is among those feeling the fall-out for his support of undocumented immigrants working in some agricultural areas to gain legal status.

Cannon recently failed to win the required 60 percent of the vote at a Republican nominating convention a little more than a week ago and now faces a primary in June against Matt Throckmorton, a former state legislator who is running hard on the immigration issue.

In Arizona, the less conservative GOPers, Rep. Jim Kolbe and Rep. Jeff Flake, are also facing the fire for their support of a broad guest-worker program that would allow a path to citizenship for most illegal aliens in the United States.

Kolbe is being challenged by state Rep. Randy Graf while Flake will face Stan Barnes.

All of the challengers say the support amounts to amnesty for illegal behavior. Groups like the controversial, ProjectUSA, which was based in New York and then fled to Utah, are fanning the flames, putting up billboards with stark messages such as "Congressman Chris Cannon wants amnesty for illegal aliens."

And the Coalition for the Future American Worker paid for radio spots to spur up anger against Cannon’s liberal support.

But Cannon, according to the Washington Times, is standing his ground, stating recently, "The more we talk to folks, the better it is, and they understand we're not talking about amnesty — we're not talking about bringing millions of folks into the U.S."

And all three argue there is a need to fill jobs and legalize those who are undocumented here in the interest of national security.

Now it’s left to be seen whether they will hold their ground and stay true to their principles when the election day comes around. – Hardbeatnews.com

Hamlin - 2004, May 21 Annex Mexico?

Hamlin - 2004, May 21

May 21, 2004


Immigration and the Mexican Border
Sheryl Hamlin

Billions of dollars for fences and guards have not kept the masses from rushing across the US-Mexican border in search of a better life here in the U.S. The coyotes profit and the lucky ones arrive to a new life, while others die in flight -- all paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.

Here is another idea worth considering: Annex Mexico. Look at the history of the U.S. and Mexico. Attached once, a series of wars in the 1900’s drew modern day boundaries.

Mexico is predominantly a Christian nation governed by laws. Its language is in use by a large segment of the population of the United States. If we annexed Mexico, making it first a protectorate like Guam, with the intention of full statehood in the future, we could change the dynamics of the Northern Hemisphere.

Mexican citizens could pass freely between the countries. Criminals could be tried under U.S. law without deportation to Mexico. Workers without criminal records could work. Money would be taxed and collected by the U.S. Government to pay for their services. The U.S. could divert the border wars money into country building efforts.

The relationship between Mexican law and U.S.law would be that of a state and federal law. The current leaders would be equivalent to the leaders of California.

Does this sound far-fetched and impossible? Possibly the benefits to both countries would outweigh the momentary loss of power and sovereignty. This is a diplomatic effort worthy of consideration.

New York City - News, Entertainment and Sports

New York City - News, Entertainment and Sports

This story was reported by Sean Gardiner, Luis Perez, Deborah S. Morris and Pete Bowles. It was written by Bowles.

May 21, 2004, 12:04 AM EDT


One worker was killed and two others critically injured Thursday when the substandard balcony overhang on which they were working collapsed at an apartment complex under construction in Brooklyn, authorities said.

Officials said the men were standing on top of a third-story balcony overhang pouring buckets of cement when the overhang crumbled and collapsed onto the balcony below, dropping the men more than 30 feet to the ground. A fourth worker jumped off the overhang onto the building's roof and escaped injury.

The accident occurred shortly after 10 a.m. at a three-building complex at 9718 Fort Hamilton Pkwy. in Bay Ridge near the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge.

City Building Department officials cited the complex's owner and two subcontractors for violating two city regulations and ordered all work on the project to be stopped pending an investigation. Late Thursday, safety workers erected scaffolding and began removing the two damaged balconies and shoring up other balconies at the site.

A preliminary investigation by the Building Department found that the balconies had been erected contrary to approved plans for the three-story buildings, said Jennifer Givner, a department spokeswoman. She said the balconies were supposed to be recessed so that the building would act as a support; instead, they were erected with the use of outside support beams.

Givner said a steel beam supporting the balcony gave way, causing the balcony to pull away from the building and pancake onto a second-story balcony, which partially collapsed.

She said the building's owner, Marine Development, and two subcontractors, Big Apple Construction of Bayside and Pro Weld Fabricators, were issued violations for not following engineering plans approved by the city and for failing to have an updated work permit.

She said investigators found that the building permit for the complex, which has been under construction since 2001, expired in February. She said the firms face maximum fines of $2,500 each for working with an expired permit. Officials of the companies could not be reached for comment.

Killed in the crash of concrete and wooden scaffolding was Angelo Gungasaca, an Ecuadorian who lived in Queens. He was pronounced dead on arrival at Victory Memorial Hospital in Brooklyn.

The two other workers, Jose Fernandez, 21, of Corona and Gam Youl Bak, 41, also of Queens, were admitted to Lutheran Medical Center's trauma ward in critical condition. Fernandez suffered two broken legs and a neck injury, and Bak was unconscious, authorities said.

All three were employed by Big Apple Construction.

"I don't know what happened," Fernandez said from his hospital bed. "I only know that God has saved me."

Edgar Jaramillo, 25, said he managed to jump to safety onto the roof when he heard a noise. "I think, 'Balcony going down, I go up,'" he said, breaking into tears. "I tried to tell everybody but they didn't hear. So I just jumped."

Lenny Gungasaca, the brother of the dead worker, said Angelo Gungasaca had worked for Big Apple for three years and each week sent money to Ecuador to support his wife and two children. "I feel really bad because my brother died," he said through a translator. "I just cannot talk about it."

Brian McLaughlin, president of the city's Central Labor Council, said an investigation found that the victims were undocumented workers.

"Immigrant workers toil in some of the most hazardous employment in our country, while New York has the highest rate of immigrants killed on the job every year," McLaughlin said. "We all know these type of tragedies are completely preventable if employers would obey existing health and safety rules."

Neighbors questioned the quality of the work and said they suspected that undocumented immigrants were being used on the project.

"I feel bad for the workers," said Frances Loftus, who has lived in the neighborhood for 50 years. "I feel they are being exploited. They are hard-working people but they need more experience. They are being taken advantage of on safety issues. It's a shame."

THAILAND-U.S.: Freer Trade Weakens Access to HIV/AIDS Drugs

THAILAND-U.S.: Freer Trade Weakens Access to HIV/AIDS Drugs

Freer Trade Weakens Access to HIV/AIDS Drugs

Marwaan Macan-Markar


BANGKOK, May 21 (IPS) - Thailand's impressive achievement in caring for those with HIV is under threat if the government signs a free trade agreement (FTA) with the United States, activists say as Bangkok prepares to start discussions in June.

This fear stems from the likelihood that once the FTA is signed, Thailand will find it all but impossible to produce the cheap generic drugs that it offers thousands of people living with HIV.

''Thailand will not be able to produce new generic drugs to stall the spread of AIDS because of the tough conditions that the U.S. plans imposing in the FTA,'' said Jacques-chai Chomthongdi, researcher at Focus on the Global South, a Bangkok-based think tank.

Among these conditions are Washington's efforts to extend the number of years that a patent for a drug can be held by a pharmaceutical company before it can be produced as a generic one.

U.S. trade negotiators are enforcing a 25-year period for drug patents under the FTA, as opposed to the 20-year period under the current rules governing global trade.

In addition, Thailand's state-owned pharmaceutical company, the lead agency in producing a host of generic drugs, will be hampered from accessing basic data necessary to make the cheaper medicines.

''The U.S. wants test data to be kept a secret,'' Jacques-chai said in an interview. ''They are determined to protect the monopoly of their pharmaceutical companies.''

Critics of the FTA are also alarmed at the possible plans by the United States to change the rules by which those who violate intellectual property rights (IPR) are prosecuted - and make this a criminal rather than just a civil offence.

As worrying, say international humanitarian agencies, is the risk that an FTA with the United States could limit Thailand's sale of generic drugs to poverty-stricken countries like Cambodia, Laos and Burma to help those with HIV.

''With the FTA, Thailand will not be able to export generics to Cambodia, Burma and Laos,'' Paul Cawthorne of Medecins Sans Frontiers (MSF) told IPS. ''The U.S. has targeted medicine in the FTAs it has signed with Singapore and Latin American countries.''

Earlier in May, officials from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce revealed how serious the intellectual property issue was during a hearing on the planned Thai-U.S. FTA held in Washington by the U.S. International Trade Commission.

''(We) will not support the signing of the final agreement unless IPR were protected and that protection enforceable,'' Myron Brilliant of the chamber was quoted in the media as having told the trade commission.

Negotiators from Washington and Bangkok are due to start trade talks in June, with the aim of completing the free trade deal in 2005. That would make Thailand the second South-east Asian country after Singapore to have such a trade pact with the United States.

Currently, the United States tops the list of Thailand's trading partners, while Thailand ranks as the 18th largest trading partner of the United States. The value of their two-way trade exceeded 21 billion U.S. dollars in 2003, with the scales tipped in favour of Thailand.

U.S. companies have also invested extensively in Thailand. The Washington-based U.S.-Thailand FTA Business Coalition estimates such investments to be over 16 billion dollars.

Critics of the FTA say that Thailand will end up the worst off in this deal, offering as a case in point the U.S. government's cool attitude toward cheaper drugs for the sick and the dying among the world's poor.

''Thailand appears ready to give up on the IPR issues and give what the U.S. wants in order to gain access to U.S. markets for its agriculture exports and products from its industrial sector,'' said Jacques-chai of Focus of the Global South.

Humanitarian agencies like MSF back their concerns by pointing to the cold reception Washington has given the recent achievements that enable developing countries to access low-cost medicines.

Shortly before the fifth ministerial conference of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) held in September in Cancun, Mexico, member governments struck an agreement in favour of the world's poor. Under that deal, developing countries were given the right to import generic medicines to cope with public health emergencies, such as HIV/AIDS.

That followed another a groundbreaking achievement at the WTO meeting in Doha in 2001. At that ministerial meeting, governments - including the United States - agreed that the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) will not be a hurdle for those afflicted with pandemics to gain access to cheaper drugs.

This optional clause under TRIPS, which protects patents, meant that developing countries could either import generic drugs or issue compulsory licences for the production of generic drugs still protected by patents.

Thailand, along with Brazil and India, were held up as the sources of hope in the wake of those agreements given their record of producing generic drugs.

The state-run pharmaceutical company here has come in for much praise by MSF and other development agencies due to the cheap medical therapy it offers people with HIV.

The monthly cost for a cocktail of anti-AIDS drugs produced by the state agency amounts to 1,200 baht (30 U.S. dollars), as against 30,000 baht (750 dollars) per month that a dose of brand-name drugs from a pharmaceutical giant costs.

More than 20,000 of the estimated 200,000 people living with HIV in Thailand who need the anti-AIDS drug have access to them through state-run hospitals.

This South-east Asian country has close to 670,000 people with HIV out of a population of over 63 million people. Over 300,000 people have died due to AIDS since the pandemic was first detected here in the 1980s.

Thailand's ability to offer generic drug therapy to 10 percent of its population with HIV is much higher than the average across Asia - where some 43,000, or only four percent, of the one million people with HIV who need the strong cocktail of anti-AIDS drugs have access to them.

In order to protect this achievement, some Thai activists from across the social spectrum have mounted a campaign that seeks to scuttle the FTA with the United States and similar trade pacts Bangkok has in mind.

''We are against the FTA because it is detrimental to Thailand,'' Witoon Lianchumroon, coordinator of an umbrella group called FTA Watch, said in an interview. ''The government has not revealed all the details, including the consequences, to the public in Thai.'' (END/2004)

The Wichita Eagle | 05/21/2004 | Witness tells of body disposal

The Wichita Eagle | 05/21/2004 | Witness tells of body disposal

Witness Lauren Bertsch says Club Mexico owner Arturo Garcia admitted to killing three men when she helped him get rid of the bodies.

BY HURST LAVIANA

The Wichita Eagle


A former worker at the Club Mexico nightclub described in court Thursday how she helped move human body parts from a freezer into a pickup and then drove them to Cowley County to incinerate them.

"It reeked," Lauren Bertsch told a Sedgwick County District Court jury of the frozen plastic bags she moved. "It smelled like something I had never smelled before. The only way I could describe it is to say it smelled like death."

Bertsch, 19, was one of the first witnesses to take the stand in the triple-murder trial of Arturo "Jay" Garcia, who owned Club Mexico, 2600 S. Oliver.

Wichita police said it was in the basement of the club that Garcia shot and killed Clint Jones, 30, on July 26 during an all-night rave. Police said that five days later Garcia shot and killed two brothers -- Oscar Ramirez, 27, and Nicolas Ramirez, 22.

During her morning testimony, Bertsch described in detail how the club was used for drugs, prostitution and after-hours parties. During her afternoon testimony, she discussed her role in disposing of victims' bodies.

Bertsch was charged with aiding a felon in connection with the case, but was later granted diversion. In a diversion agreement, the charge is dropped if the defendant meets certain conditions set by the prosecutor.

Bertsch said she and a girlfriend first went to the club as customers in April, about three months after it opened. Three days after the visit, she said, she began working at the club.

Her job was to deliver drinks, talk to customers and help maintain a "cool environment." Bertsch said she made $50 to $200 a night in tips.

The club was normally open from 6 p.m. to 2 a.m., Bertsch said, and security guards with metal-detecting wands were at the doors on weekends. She said the majority of customers used cocaine or meth.

"Everyone tried to be inconspicuous, but I knew a lot of it was going on because I saw the coke and meth," she said.

It was also a place where you could buy drugs.

"If you knew the right people and they knew you were cool, you could find it," she said.

There were two types of after-hours parties at the club, Bertsch said. The first was for Garcia's friends and often included exotic dancers. The second type, all-night raves that lasted from 2:30 to 11 a.m., were open to everyone.

Bertsch said she got close to several people who worked at or visited the club. She said Garcia was among them.

"He was like a big brother to me," she said. "I loved him."

During a rave on the morning of July 27 -- about the time that Jones was killed -- Bertsch said she noticed that Garcia and some other club regulars were acting strangely.

"Everyone was acting a little tense," she said. "I wasn't allowed in the office. The kitchen was locked. Someone was blocking the entrance to the VIP room. The way people were carrying themselves seemed to be different."

On Aug. 6 -- a day she went to an orientation class for a new job at another restaurant -- Garcia asked whether he could use her family's land in Cowley County to burn some trash.

Bertsch said she suspected Garcia was trying to get rid of a body.

"It struck me as something secretive, something he needed to keep away from society," she said. "I thought I knew what he wanted to burn."

After agreeing to let Garcia use the land, Bertsch said, he drove her to his duplex in the 1500 block of North Market, and they went inside a detached garage.

The locked, top-loading freezer had a refrigerator door on top of it and a tire on top of that. Inside the freezer were objects that appeared to be wrapped in plastic bags.

"They were different sizes, different shapes," Bertsch said.

"Why did you stay?" asked District Attorney Nola Foulston.

"Because I told him I would help him," Bertsch replied.

The two loaded half of the packages into the truck, Bertsch said. She said she drank brandy during the 45-minute drive to Cowley County.

"Did you have any questions (like), 'Gee, why are we hauling this to my land?' " Foulston asked.

"I don't remember asking that question," Bertsch said. "He began to explain to me that it was three people in the back of the truck -- or parts of three people. And he explained why two of them had to be killed."

She said Garcia described how the Ramirez brothers, on the day they died, had come to the club to beat him up. She said Garcia said he shot them because they were threatening him with a broken beer bottle and because he had his son with him.

Once they got to the land, Bertsch said, the parts were loaded into two 50-gallon barrels, doused with gasoline and set afire. The remaining body parts were picked up later that day and disposed of in the same manner.

The trial resumes today in the courtroom of District Judge William Woolley.

Hydro engineer guilty of importing drugs

Montreal Gazette - canada.com network

A Hydro-Québec engineer from Montreal has been found guilty of importing large quantities of cocaine.

Fernand Imbeault, 66, defended himself at the trial where he heard the guilty verdict read by Judge Jean-Guy Boilard. The judge ordered Imbeault be incarcerated until his sentencing hearing. The Crown is seeking a prison sentence of 12 to 15 years.

Imbeault was found guilty of conspiring to import 200 kilograms of cocaine every 10 days from Mexico in the spring of 2002. A criminal lawyer, José Guede, is accused of aiding Imbeault. His trial will begin in December.

2 immigration plans flawed

2 immigration plans flawed

May. 21, 2004 12:00 AM


Now that the Democrats have an immigration bill to counter the president's proposed guest worker program, which program would best improve the immigration situation?

Neither will decrease the number of illegal border crossers or how many will die trying to enter the United States illegally.

The Democrats' bill will allow immigrants to become permanent legal residents if they prove they lived in the United States for five years and have been employed for two years. I guess the Democrats in Congress didn't know it's illegal to hire undocumented immigrants.

The Democrats' proposal should be called triple amnesty. First amnesty for entering the country illegally, second amnesty for working here illegally and third amnesty for the employers who illegally hired them.

The Bush proposal would give millions of illegal aliens temporary legal status, which is the same as amnesty.

Both proposals would benefit employers of undocumented immigrants. As long as laws against the hiring of undocumented aliens are not enforced, those laws will continue to be broken and people will continue to cross our border illegally or die trying. - Bob Haran
Phoenix





Linguistic lunacy


What a shame the Arizona Department of Education is threatening to ban a Spanish spelling bee.

It shows that Tom Horne and his staff are much more interested in stamping out Spanish than they are in teaching children to speak English.

All major corporations are concentrating their marketing efforts on a population with a growing number of people who speak Spanish. Anyone who graduates from an Arizona school literate in English and Spanish will have a definite edge over someone who is limited by being literate in English only.

Don't be deceived by English-only advocates who constantly state that California's test scores have gone up as a result of their doing away with bilingual education. California went to great efforts to lower class size, and it appears to have paid off.

Secondly, there are still plenty of bilingual programs in California. Its law isn't as tough as the law in Arizona. Thousands of parents signed waivers so their children could continue to receive bilingual education.

Last I heard, there were 29 lawsuits pending regarding the English-only proposition. It's only a matter of time before one succeeds.

- Sue Azizi


Chandler

The Washington Dispatch

The Washington Dispatch

Immigration Invasion View from a Border Patrol Officer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commentary by Frosty Wooldridge
May 21, 2004


After 30 years in the Border Patrol as a special agent and highly decorated veteran, John W. Slagle wrote an expose’ ripping the pants off Tom Ridge’s Homeland Security charade. Slagle exposes Congress’ complete assistance of illegal immigration. Finally, he uncovers President Bush’s unending support for this massive invasion that will, in the end, prove more catastrophic to this nation than dozens of 9/11’s.



Interviewing John W. Slagle at his home in the Arizona desert brings to mind what an interview with Harry S. Truman might have been like. The buck stops here! Slagle, a certified second degree black belt instructor in Japanese sword fighting, is not the kind of man that plays a casual game of chess. He’s a warrior. He’s defended America in the Navy and as a border patrol officer for most of his life.



After watching the accelerating illegal alien invasion for three decades, he wrote, Illegal Entries as an expose’ of America’s failed immigration policy. You won’t be disappointed as it reads like a James Bond novel. But I this case, Slagle illustrates how the United States loses its national sovereignty via the past five presidents and Congress. What defines this invasion? Power and money at the highest levels! It involves corporations and politicians representing illegal aliens more than American citizens. It exposes reasons for the downright violation of the rule of law by our own lawmakers.



America’s downfall, Slagle writes, began with the surreptitious passing by Teddy Kennedy and LBJ’s 1965 Immigration Reform Act. This little known document was not voted on or asked for by American citizens. It opened the floodgates to one million immigrants annually. Previously, only 178,000 annually were allowed. At first, they arrived without fanfare. But today, 60 million immigrants later and rising like a dangerous tidal wave; they crash upon our shores without pause. Where we were once a stable population, we are now the fastest growing country behind China and India.



Once the corporations realized huge profits from cheap labor immigrants, they busted unions and lowered wages. A few elites profited while the rest of us paid the bills. Soon, illegals trickled into America. Now, they ‘pour’ in at one million annually. The total of 2.3 million people yearly has become an endless human monsoon. “Due to the fact that illegals work for far less money that US citizens, greedy employers hired illegals for maximum profits,” Slagle said. “Taxes did not have to be paid, nor employee benefits.”



Legal immigrant costs alone to American taxpayers exceed $68 billion annually. But American citizens started paying benefits for illegals such as aid to dependent children, billions for schooling, medical services, free lunch programs, assisted housing and higher insurance rates. Along the way, illegals drove cars without insurance or licenses. With them came crime, diseases and prisons. Legal and illegal immigrants fill an astounding 29% of state and federal prisons at a taxpayer cost of $1 billion annually.



“Illegal immigration and the ruthless nature of alien smugglers who transport human cargo by vehicles is a serious concern,” Slagle said. “Smugglers will pack a pick-up three deep. Aliens, stacked like cordwood, are covered with tarps as smugglers proceed to staging areas.” Where do they obtain the vehicles? In 2003, Phoenix became the car-jacking capital of the world with 57,600 stolen SUV’s and pick-ups. And who among you thinks a head of lettuce or handpicked strawberry was cheap?



What does a ‘coyote’ make? “A smuggler easily makes $5,000.00 a week tax free,” Slagle said.



At first in the 70s, the flow included 8,000 arrests of illegals per month in one sector of Arizona with an estimated 16,000 'got aways’, but they were all cheap labors and prospective voters. How safe are Americans from this invasion? “The sale of false documents are available worldwide,” Slagle said. “A criminal can look like an ordinary citizen in the blink of an eye.”



In contrast, in 2004, Border Patrol apprehensions reached 96,521 in January which was up from 86,925 in January, 2003. More sobering is the fact that agents catch only one in five aliens.



“For a price, anyone can be smuggled into the USA by human traffickers whether cheap labor, wanted criminals or terrorist cells,” Slagle said.



In 1979, Daryl Gates, in Los Angeles, created the perfect cover for illegal aliens with his ‘Special Order 40’. It gave illegal aliens immunity from police arrest. Unfortunately, that ‘sanctuary order’ also provided cover for the 20,000 member 18th Street Gang in LA as well as the MS-13 Salvadoran gangs that now operate in 28 American cities. Worse, Governor Baldacci of Maine signed the first statewide sanctuary law into being this year.



What we’re seeing is our Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal alien, you can drive a car without a driver’s license or insurance. You may obtain medical care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.



As Slagle chronicles in his book, Illegal Entries, the United States suffers a hemorrhaging of its sovereignty, rule of law, single language and cohesiveness as the onslaught of this immigration juggernaut sweeps like a deadly plague across this country.



Next: Part II—Incredible Money and Drugs Being Imported and Exported


EUROPE - OR GEORGIAFORNIA? MALDEF SPEAKS. By D.A. King posted May 21, 2004, 13:58

EUROPE - OR GEORGIAFORNIA? MALDEF SPEAKS. By D.A. King posted May 21, 2004, 13:58

Drugs Easily Obtained at Nogales Pharmacy

East Valley Tribune Online

Special Report: Muscle relaxant favored by E.V. teens easily obtained at Nogales pharmacies
By Kristina Davis, Tribune
NOGALES, Mexico - Here, just across the border, neon-colored signs in the windows of dozens of pharmacies scream "Soma for sale."
Salesmen in white lab coats battle for business on the sidewalks and will readily fill orders for several thousand of the muscle relaxant pills.

"About 60 percent of the people who buy Soma are the younger people," said Israel Sandoval, a manager at Con Vida pharmacy.

Pharmacy workers said they fill Soma orders several times a week for American teenagers, a trend that has been going on for years.

But the Soma pipeline from Mexico has been largely hush-hush in the East Valley until police broke up a couple of Soma drug rings recently at local high schools.

A 16-year-old Gilbert girl was arrested last month and later charged with two drug-related crimes, and seven other teens could face similar charges after Soma was found at five Mesa and Gilbert schools. Twenty-nine Gilbert students were suspended in March for buying, possessing or selling the drug on campus.

As the prescription drug trend has come to the forefront, Mexican officials say they are cracking down on pharmacies that sell the drug without authorized prescriptions, while U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration officials plan to propose placing the drug under federal control.

AN EASY BUY
Soma, or carisoprodol, is a muscle relaxant that requires a prescription in Arizona. In Mexico, it is sold under the name Somacid, a less expensive brand manufactured in Guadalajara.

Last month, the Mexican federal Secretariat of Health sent a letter to Nogales pharmacies warning that Soma was a controlled substance and was illegal to sell without a prescription from an American or Mexican doctor, pharmacy employees said.

But Dr. Jaime Leon, an official with the Secretariat of Health in Hermosillo, Mexico, could not confirm if Soma has been officially reclassified under the country’s General Health Law.

"Unfortunately, a revision would still make it hard to control," Leon said. "It would still be sold freely."

And that’s apparent. Most pharmacies continue to sell the drug with no questions asked.

A Tribune reporter easily purchased 100 Somacid pills for $30 without a prescription from Nogales Pharmacy earlier this month. But at other pharmacies, a prescription was necessary when the reporter identified herself as such. A prescription, however, can be easily purchased from pharmacies or local doctors.

"I can write a prescription for $20 extra," offered one salesman from Discount Pharmacy, the city’s largest pharmacy chain. "It will say your name and take once a day or once an hour, whatever you want."

BRINGING IT HOME
Soma is not only easy to purchase in Mexican pharmacies, but it is legal to bring across the border in small amounts without a prescription.

All prescription medications from Mexico require a prescription from an American doctor, said Joyce Jarvis, a supervisor with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

But the customs agency and DEA allow travelers to bring back up to 50 pills
per person of any FDA-approved medication from Mexico without a prescription, federal officials said. The DEA considers that to be a reasonable amount of pills for legitimate personal medical use.

The pills must be declared to customs officials, or officials can seize the drug and fine violators the domestic value of the medication.

"We are seeing in recent years the regulations being exploited by some people bringing the drugs into the U.S. for illicit use," said Ramona Sanchez, a spokeswoman for the DEA in Phoenix.

The concern has prompted DEA officials to look at making Soma a federally controlled substance, which would place enforcement duties with the DEA instead of local police. A federal jurisdiction would mean harsher sentences for Soma buyers, distributors and traffickers.

Sanchez said the DEA is beginning the process by gathering information on Soma for a report to be presented to the Department of Health and Human Services to reclassify the drug.

"When we see teens abusing a drug like this, you can bet it will slowly creep into our radar. We take it very seriously," Sanchez said. "Hopefully it will prompt Mexican authorities that the problem is filtering in through the U.S."

Soma (carisoprodol)

• Soma is a prescription muscle relaxant manufactured in the United States.

• Alcohol-like effects include wooziness, drowsiness and giddiness.

• Abuse of the drug can result in addiction, seizures, coma or death.

• Somacid is a Mexican brand manufactured in Guadalajara.

• In Mexico, Soma costs $30 to $35 and Somacid costs $18 to $30 for two 50-pill bottles.

• In the United States, street value is $1 to $5 per 350 mg pill.

National News: Immigration bill would make it easier to deport criminal aliens

National News: Immigration bill would make it easier to deport criminal aliens

May 21, 2004 (AXcess News/SHFW) Washington DC – An Indiana representative is sponsoring legislation that will make it more difficult for immigrants convicted of crimes to delay being deported.

"Immigrants have been allowed to stay here under a broken system," said Rep. John Hostettler, R, at a Capitol Hill news conference Wednesday. "It's not fair that they take advantage of this country's good will."

The Fairness in Immigration Litigation Act, which is also being introduced in the Senate, will deny criminal aliens the right to file habeas corpus petitions asking federal district courts to review their deportation orders. Such petitions usually prolong the immigrant’s stay in this country.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, the bill's chief Senate sponsor, said that, currently, aliens with criminal convictions can easily obtain review of their deportation orders by a federal district court. But illegal aliens who do not have criminal convictions have to go directly to the court of appeals after receiving an order of deportation. Under current statues, he said, criminals get more reviews and are able to delay their deportation.

"In 1995 there were 403 immigration habeas petitions filed," said Hatch, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Advertisement


"In 2003, that number rose to 2,374. Clearly a legislative fix is necessary to streamline the judicial review process."

Hostettler introduced a companion bill in the House.

The bill will also address three other areas of immigration law.

It will put the burden of proof in asylum cases on the applicant. There are many cases of asylum fraud because the U.S. government has the burden of disproving claims, Hatch said.

The act will also clarify existing statutes so the U.S. government can deport illegal aliens even if their home country doesn't want them back, Hatch said.

And, because immigration is a national concern, the act will consolidate immigration review in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington.

Hatch made clear that the point of the bill is not to make new rules for deportation or take away any rights of aliens. It will just make the process more fair, he said.

"What we have done to this point isn't working," said the bill's co-sponsor, Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. "This bill is an important step in the right direction."

AXcess News will be reporting on any new market trends related to this story. Members should watch their in-box for late breaking news. If you're not a member, consider joining now. Members get the latest business news, commentaries and stock picks delivered right to their in-box.

WFAA.com-Egyptian Man Held for Bomb threat and immigration violations on Greyhound heded to Dallas

WFAA.com | News for Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas | Texas/Southwest

Man tells immigration officials he left bomb on bus
Nothing found on Dallas-bound shuttle; he's in custody


09:41 PM CDT on Friday, May 21, 2004


By ERNESTO LONDOя / Al D?



An undocumented Egyptian man taken off a Dallas-bound Greyhound bus Thursday night near El Paso told immigration authorities that he had left a bomb onboard.

The bus was stopped and searched, but no bomb was found and the man was being held Friday on immigration violations.

Border Patrol spokesman Bill Brooks said the 41-year-old man initially told agents at the Sierra Blanca checkpoint that he wasn't traveling with any luggage other than a backpack.

"During inspection, we found he had a baggage claim receipt," Mr. Brooks said. "We asked him what was in the bag. He said it was a bomb."

Roughly two hours after the arrest, a bomb squad stopped the bus on a deserted stretch of Interstate 10, about 120 miles east of Sierra Blanca. Passengers were asked to disembark and traffic was blocked off for several miles in both directions while officers searched the bus, officials said.

"There's no interest in this guy as a terrorism threat," said Special Agent Andrea Simmons, an FBI spokeswoman in El Paso. "It sounds as though there might be some mental stability concerns."

Officials declined to identify the man, who was being held Friday at the Hudspeth County Jail due to his immigration status.

George Campbell, assistant chief Border Patrol agent for the Marfa sector, said the man had been deported from the United States in 2002 and apparently re-entered the country through New York City sometime this year. He said the man told officers that he was headed to Dallas.

Agent Campbell said federal prosecutors in El Paso will probably charge the man with re-entering the country in violation of his deportation order.

Twenty-seven passengers arrived at the Greyhound station in downtown Dallas shortly after 3 p.m. Friday.

Some said they were surprised it took law enforcement officials two hours to stop the bus after the bomb threat was made.

"It was surreal, an awful experience," said passenger Michele Douglas, 34. "It was unbelievable. This kind of thing just doesn't happen on a Greyhound bus."

Passengers said they were asked to leave their belongings in the bus, disembark and form a single line. While officers searched the bus, passengers said they had to wait in the rain. They were then transported to the Reeves County Sheriff's Department on a jail bus, they said.

"When they told us to step away from the bus we knew it was a red alert," said passenger Charlie Briggs, 48. "We left everything on the bus. Everything was tossed out in the rain."

The passengers said they were told the inspection was connected to the immigration arrest but were not told about the bomb threat for several hours.

A spokeswoman for Greyhound Lines Inc. said passengers who were on that bus will be reimbursed for the cost of their fare if they request it.

"Events were largely out of our control," said Lynn Brown, vice president for corporate communications for Greyhound in Dallas. "In situations like these, we cooperate fully with authorities. Passenger safety is our top concern."

Ms. Douglas said the ordeal made her miss her bus connection to Savannah, Ga., and she would have to wait four hours to catch the next bus in that direction.

"A shower would be nice," she said.

E-mail elondono@aldiatx.com

It's truth we need, not guest workers

It's truth we need, not guest workers

So which is the truth?

The Republic's editorial stance on Wednesday ("Coyote cunning") states that smugglers of illegal aliens, known as coyotes, survive because "the simple fact that U.S. businesses want the labor that Mexicans and other Latin American people will risk their lives to provide."

Yet last week The Republic quoted Vince Wood, assistant director of the state Department of Economic Security's benefits and eligibility division, in an article about how Arizona's food stamp program more than doubled with a 108 percent jump, that people have been moving to Arizona hoping to find work, but there are not enough entry-level and low-skill jobs to meet the need.

So which one is the truth? They both are.

There aren't enough entry-level and low-skilled jobs because they are being filled with undocumented immigrants to the degree that they are displacing naturalized citizens. Without steady jobs on which to rely, these citizens turn to the state and federal government for assistance in the form of food stamps and other social services.

Congress doesn't need to get busy shaping a fair, humane guest-worker program from the proposals in front of them, as The Republic suggests. It needs to realize that we have adequate resources for entry-level and low-skilled workers, with more than 2,000 school-age children dropping out of class every day. It needs to understand that we don't need to import cheap labor so businesses can undercut trade wages. It needs to get busy getting its citizens back to work and off of assistance.

The truth hurts sometimes, but someone in Congress needs to step up and tell it. - Michael Ricci, Phoenix

It's truth we need, not guest workers

It's truth we need, not guest workers

It's truth we need, not guest workers
May. 22, 2004 12:00 AM


So which is the truth?

The Republic's editorial stance on Wednesday ("Coyote cunning") states that smugglers of illegal aliens, known as coyotes, survive because "the simple fact that U.S. businesses want the labor that Mexicans and other Latin American people will risk their lives to provide."

Yet last week The Republic quoted Vince Wood, assistant director of the state Department of Economic Security's benefits and eligibility division, in an article about how Arizona's food stamp program more than doubled with a 108 percent jump, that people have been moving to Arizona hoping to find work, but there are not enough entry-level and low-skill jobs to meet the need.

So which one is the truth? They both are.

There aren't enough entry-level and low-skilled jobs because they are being filled with undocumented immigrants to the degree that they are displacing naturalized citizens. Without steady jobs on which to rely, these citizens turn to the state and federal government for assistance in the form of food stamps and other social services.

Congress doesn't need to get busy shaping a fair, humane guest-worker program from the proposals in front of them, as The Republic suggests. It needs to realize that we have adequate resources for entry-level and low-skilled workers, with more than 2,000 school-age children dropping out of class every day. It needs to understand that we don't need to import cheap labor so businesses can undercut trade wages. It needs to get busy getting its citizens back to work and off of assistance.

The truth hurts sometimes, but someone in Congress needs to step up and tell it. - Michael Ricci, Phoenix

The New York Times > New York Region > Laborer's Death Prompts Homicide Investigation

The New York Times > New York Region > Laborer's Death Prompts Homicide Investigation

Laborer's Death Prompts Homicide Investigation
By MICHAEL BRICK and JESS WISLOSKI

Published: May 22, 2004


he job paid $90 a day with no benefits. It required heavy lifting while balancing on flimsy platforms three stories high, exposed to the elements but not to the knowledge that the work flouted safety rules and construction blueprints.

Angel Segovia, 37, took the job, and for him there were even more hardships. Besides having to rise at 4:30 a.m. for a two hour train ride or share a three-bedroom apartment with five cousins, Mr. Segovia also had to give up seeing his wife, two daughters and a son for four years, since moving to New York to find work to support them.

Advertisement


And in the end, which came Thursday morning, the job cost him his life. His employer was Big Apple Development and Construction of Bayside, Queens.

Prosecutors in the Brooklyn district attorney's office opened a homicide investigation into the death of Mr. Segovia, an Ecuadorean immigrant who fell when an illegally constructed balcony roof snapped from the wall of a new luxury condominium building in Brooklyn, law enforcement officials said yesterday.

The city medical examiner's office said his death was caused by blows to his head and torso and injuries to internal organs. The death was ruled an accident, a medical designation that meant the collapse of the balcony was an unexpected event. The ruling did not assign or relieve civil or criminal liability, said Ellen Borakove, a spokeswoman for the medical examiner's office.

Advocates for laborers and immigrants used Mr. Segovia's death to call for criminal prosecutions of developers and construction companies that put workers at risk. They criticized the efforts of federal labor regulators as ineffective.

Robert M. Morgenthau, the Manhattan district attorney, whose office has no jurisdiction in Mr. Segovia's death, said in a telephone interview that the exploitation of undocumented laborers is increasingly drawing the attention of prosecutors in large cities.

"We're going out and trying to find these cases, because the workers are afraid to report them," Mr. Morgenthau said. "I do think it's a serious and growing problem, the exploitation of illegal workers."

The city's Buildings Department workers, who had sealed off the site of the accident at the intersection of Forth Hamilton Parkway and 97th Street in Bay Ridge, began dismantling the balconies yesterday. Some of the workers on the project returned to the building yesterday to pack up and head off to work on another project for Big Apple in New Jersey.

One of the two workers injured in the collapse, Jose Fernandez, 20, was released from Lutheran Medical Center in Sunset Park, said Neal Gorman, a hospital spokesman. A second injured worker, who was admitted to Lutheran under the name Bac Gumyul, 40, was in critical condition, Mr. Gorman said.

Mr. Segovia and the injured workers were pouring concrete onto a balcony roof that was held up by cantilevered support beams when one of the beams gave way, sending the workers tumbling three stories in a deluge of bricks and flowing wet cement.

The cantilevering contradicted plans on file with the Buildings Department, which issued violations on Thursday against three companies involved in the project - Marine Partners, the owner, of Yonkers; Big Apple Development and Construction, the main contractor; and Pro Weld Fabricators, the contractor on the balcony work, of South Ozone Park, Queens. Officials of those companies did not return repeated calls seeking comment yesterday.

Brian M. McLaughlin, a state Assemblyman and the president of the New York City Central Labor Council, an advocacy group chartered by the A.F.L.-C.I.O., said Mr. Segovia's death underscored the need for criminal prosecutions to ensure safe working conditions for immigrant laborers.

"You have people who come here seeking a better way of life," Mr. McLaughlin said. "They're willing to take a job whether it's dangerous or not."

Across the country, prosecutors in California have been more aggressive than others in pursuing convictions in connection with workplace deaths, but New York prosecutors have had some successes.

In January, Philip V. Minucci, a contractor, was sentenced to 3 to 10 years in prison after pleading guilty to manslaughter charges in the deaths of five construction workers who were killed when a scaffold collapsed at a building in Gramercy Park in October 2001. Mr. Minucci admitted that he had designed the scaffold without regard for its safety.

Mr. Segovia, who had worked as a farmer and construction worker in Ecuador, had viewed the job, dangerous as it was, as a way to build a home for his wife, Emma, and their children, according to relatives in Queens interviewed yesterday who asked that their names be withheld because they fear deportation.

Mr. Segovia had moved to the United States four years ago, and three of his brothers had followed, spreading out to find work in Brooklyn, Connecticut and Pennsylvania. Other family members were closer. Mr. Segovia lived in a three-bedroom apartment on the second floor of a vinyl-sided, two-story home with a view of a car dealership in Jamaica, Queens. So did five of his cousins.

He found work with Big Apple a year after arriving in the United States, and worked for the company steadily for the next three years, his family said. Two years ago, Mr. Segovia broke a hand on the job and was out of work for a few months.

He had not traveled home in those four years because of his immigration status, and his wife and children have never been to the United States for the same reason. His paychecks came twice a month, amounting to a little more than $400 a week, and he sent about $200 a week to his wife, family members said.

"He was building a house in Ecuador," Mr. Segovia's cousin said. "He didn't finish."


Ann Farmer and David Chen contributed reporting for this article

deseretnews.com | Migration to U.S. a hellish journey

deseretnews.com | Migration to U.S. a hellish journey

Migration to U.S. a hellish journey

Locked big rig is airless, sweltering
By Pauline Arrillaga
Associated Press

Editor's note: A deadly tractor-trailer run from El Paso, Texas, to Dallas reveals the desperation and greed fueling the booming business of smuggling human beings. This is Part 1 of a three-part serial narrative.


An undocumented Mexican immigrant lies on boxes in the back of an 18-wheel truck near Dallas in July 2002. He and other illegal immigrants were locked in the truck as they were smuggled into the United States.

Associated Press
CHAPARRAL, N.M. — The 18-wheeler pulled off the desert highway and rumbled down a pockmarked clay road, its headlights raking a desolate hamlet of doublewides.
The big rig, making an unscheduled detour at the start of a midnight run from El Paso to Dallas, slowed as it approached a dingy mobile home. Then the headlights snapped off.
Moving as stealthily as a tractor-trailer can, it turned through a gap in a chain-link fence, backed up and stopped at the mobile home's back door.
Jason Sprague climbed down from the cab into the balmy night air and swung open the trailer's heavy cargo doors. Then he headed inside for his money.
That's when he saw them. Under a faint ceiling lamp, dozens of ragged people waited silently in two lines stretching between the kitchen and the living room, men on one side, women and little ones on the other. Some clasped small bags; others had only the clothes on their backs.
Avoiding their glances, Sprague hurried past and stepped into the bathroom where a woman was waiting. She handed him a bulging envelope. Inside was $3,000 in cash.
"You'll get the rest when it's completed," she told him.
Sprague walked back to the cab and settled into the driver's seat as the woman and her partner loaded the human cargo.
He had been told there would be 32 of them — illegal immigrants who had made it across the Rio Grande to this drop house 20 miles outside El Paso. Now they had to be smuggled past an internal Border Patrol checkpoint and dropped off at a truck stop in Dallas.
As they clambered into the freight compartment, Sprague felt the rig rock. He wasn't counting, but the rocking went on and on. How many people were they stuffing back there?







"Uno por uno," the loaders hissed. One by one. Walk fast.
In the line, inching forward, Luciano Alcocer smiled to himself, grateful to be moving.
Eight days earlier, the carpenter from Mexico City had kissed his wife and daughters goodbye. Don't cry, he told his children as their eyes filled; this could be our salvation.
The companies that once bought the tables and desks Alcocer built had shut down. But there was work to be had in the United States. A relative already in the States made the arrangements, sending about $1,500 to the smugglers. He gave Alcocer a number to call once he reached the Mexican border town of Ciudad Juarez.
Alcocer followed the instructions. He met a guide who led him through chest-high water across the Rio Grande. In El Paso, a car picked him up.
For days, he'd hidden inside the crowded mobile home, where two members of the smuggling ring gouged migrants $5 for three packages of ramen noodles, $10 for a six-pack of beer.
Now, half-past midnight on July 27, 2002, the slight, 5-foot-3, 41-year-old, carrying only his hopes and a couple of T-shirts, climbed a stepladder propped against the truck's open freight compartment.
Two of the others, Pioquinto Cabrera and Guillermo Gallo, grabbed his arms and hauled him inside. It was dark in there, and cramped.
The 53-foot-long aluminum-walled trailer, lined with plywood, was packed almost to the roof with cardboard boxes of medical supplies manufactured in Mexico and bound for Wisconsin.
Alcocer crawled three-quarters of the way in, settling atop a box on the driver's side. Stretching his legs out in front of him, he reached up and touched the ceiling.

A police evidence photo shows dents in the side of a truck where illegal immigrants tried to gouge air holes with a barber's scissors.

Associated Press
Others silently climbed inside — about 40 people in all. Another seven or so, all women and children, piled into the sleeping compartment behind the cab.
Inside the trailer, Alcocer watched the shadowy outlines of the passengers filing in.
There was Jose Gaston Ramirez, a 59-year-old shoemaker from Cuernavaca, looking very American in a red Calvin Klein T-shirt. He was bound for Chicago to reunite with his daughter.
Edson Rojas, a tall, skinny 16-year-old from Mexico City eager to join his father in Kansas, climbed up and claimed a spot. Like several others, he'd paid extra to ride in the sleeping compartment but was herded into the back anyway.
A few complained. The smugglers told them to go back to Mexico if they didn't like it.
Cabrera and Gallo were the last to scramble onto the boxes. The 28-year-old Cabrera was traveling from Veracruz to Kentucky to work the cattle farms. Gallo, 32, was on his way from Mexico City to New York for a restaurant job.
"Silencio!" the loaders ordered. Especially at the Border Patrol checkpoint, everyone must be silent.
With that, the heavy doors closed and everything went black.
Alcocer thought he heard a lock click. It was as if the doors were closing on an old life of despair. Later, he would invoke a different metaphor: Las puertas a la muerte.
The doors to death.
The engine roared to life and the truck began to roll.
It was the beginning of an American journey that thousands of illegal immigrants make. But this one would end almost a year and a half later — in a federal courtroom.
It was nearly 4 a.m. when Sprague picked up his co-driver, Troy Dock, in El Paso. Dock had made smuggling runs before, but this was Sprague's first, and he was jittery. With Dallas still at least 10 hours away, he wondered if they should call the whole thing off.
But there was money to be made — another $1,200 after the migrants were dropped at the truck stop.
Dock drove on; Sprague dozed.
Dock, 30, was short and stocky with the face of a choirboy. Sprague, 27, was built like the high school quarterback he once was, with a goatee and a tattoo of his name on his arm.
"Tweedledee and tweedledum," an acquaintance called them — a couple of bumbling good ol' boys. They'd just been hired as a driving team for Boyd Logistics Inc. of El Paso when Dock's contact in Ciudad Juarez, Pat Valdes, called to say he had a load that was ready to move.
Now, as they rolled down Interstate 10, Dock's cell phone kept ringing. It was Pat Valdes, Dock's contact in Ciudad Juarez, checking their progress, asking if they'd made it through the checkpoint yet.
Dock promised to touch base when they were safely through.
Ninety minutes east of El Paso, they drew near the Border Patrol checkpoint at Sierra Blanca, one of a network intended to intercept illegal immigrants and drugs moving north from the border.
In the blackness of the freight compartment, the illegals passed the time talking in hushed voices. Alcocer listened politely as an Argentine barber boasted of plans to ply his trade in Los Angeles.
"Tengo sed," someone said. I'm thirsty. One of the men used the illuminated dial of his watch to locate a water jug.
Sometime before sunrise, Alcocer felt the truck slow. The checkpoint, he figured. Everyone fell silent.
But a thought was nagging him: The smugglers had promised the trailer would be air-conditioned, but it was stuffy. Was any air getting in?
Outside, bright lights bathed the highway. Dock pulled the rig behind a line of trucks moving slowly past the checkpoint.
The checkpoint routine was like Russian roulette. Some trucks were stopped and searched, others waved through. Dock was pushing his luck; twice before he'd made it through with loads of illegals.
His stomach knotted. But even before he came to a complete stop, the agent waved him on by.
Dock let out a breath; Sprague dozed on.
A half-hour down the road, Dock pulled into a truck stop to get a drink. Using hand signals because he spoke little Spanish, he asked those in the sleeping compartment if they wanted anything. They declined. He didn't open the trailer to ask the others because he was afraid someone might see them. Besides, Valdes' orders were to keep the doors shut.
The sun was coming up as Dock swung back on the interstate. It was still 7 1/2 hours to Dallas.
Inside the freight compartment, Alcocer licked a finger and held it up to see if he could feel any air moving. Nothing.
Slivers of morning light squeezed through the seals of the trailer doors. The tempera- ture outside was rising, headed toward 95 degrees.
Rojas, the 16-year-old, stripped off his shirt. Alcocer did the same.
He grew very thirsty, but there was no water left in the jugs. They were urinals now.
"No hay aire," a woman said softly. There's no air.
The word spread quickly. No hay aire, other travelers murmured. No hay aire!
Suddenly a young man vomited.
Some of the migrants began moving toward the doors, praying that a little oxygen was leaking through.
Alcocer heard ripping. Others were pulling flaps from the packing boxes and using them to fan themselves. Alcocer snatched off a piece and waved it furiously.
The effort exhausted him.
Digging through the boxes, someone pulled out some plastic tubes and passed them forward. Those at the rear tugged away the gummy seals around the trailer doors in search of an airway, then forced one end of a tube through the crevice and tried to breathe through the other.
Nothing.
Gallo, the strapping man who had helped Alcocer aboard, began tearing at the plywood on the trailer walls, slicing his fingers. Alcocer tried to help, pounding the wood with his elbows. They managed to break off a few pieces, only to expose the trailer's aluminum walls.
How do we make a hole? someone said.
The barber, Alcocer thought. He must have scissors!
"No, my friend," the barber said. His kit was too expensive.
Suddenly, all eyes were on him in the dim light.
"Give them to me," Alcocer demanded, his voice harsh.
Gallo grabbed the scissors. He stabbed the aluminum walls again and again, gouging a couple of small holes before the scissors bent uselessly.
They tried everything. Nothing worked.
The temperature inside the freight compartment kept climbing. Later, police would estimate it reached 150 degrees.
"I'm thirsty," Alcocer cried out.
Someone passed him a jug. He knew what was in it, but what choice did he have? He drank.
Up in the cab, the roar of the engine drowned out the noise from the cargo hold. Sprague and Dock drove on, oblivious. Cruising through the blazing prairie outside Odessa, they popped a Garth Brooks recording into the tape player and switched on the cab's air conditioner.
Back in the trailer, their passengers were swinging their arms wildly — pounding the walls, the doors, the ceiling. The sound was booming, but in Alcocer's oxygen-deprived state, it seemed oddly muffled.
They shouted: Open up! Open up!
Hyperventilating, a teenage girl crawled toward the doors and screamed, "Call 911! Call anybody!"
In the gloom, Alcocer watched Jose Gaston Ramirez lie down on the boxes. Back in the mobile home, he had snored when he slept, but he wasn't making a sound now.
Pioquinto Cabrera crawled by, clutching a jug of urine. Alcocer asked for another drink. No, Cabrera said. It's for one of the ladies.
Another traveler peeled off his shirt, put it in his mouth and tried to suck out the sweat.
Soon, the hallucinations started. A helicopter is flying overhead! someone shouted. The police are following! cried another. I have a gun; I'm going to shoot out the tires! another yelled. But none of it was so.
No quiero morir, someone whimpered. I don't want to die.
Alcocer whispered a prayer. "I'm in your hands, God. Take care of my family."
Then his head lolled back, and he closed his eyes.

To be continued...



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Editor's note — The scenes inside the truck cab are based on jailhouse interviews with Troy Dock and Jason Sprague, on transcripts and videos of their police interrogations, and on court testimony of migrants who rode in the sleeping compartment. The description of the loading is from interviews with Sprague and migrant Luciano Alcocer, and on the testimony of other migrants. The movements of the truck come from the drivers and from the vehicle's Global Positioning System, obtained from court records. The scenes inside the trailer are from interviews with migrants including Alcocer and Guillermo Gallo, and from the testimony of 10 other migrants. The migrants' backgrounds come from interviews with them and investigators, and from medical records, death certificates and court testimony. The direct quotes appear as they are remembered by those who spoke or heard them.

Prostitute smuggling suspected

Prostitute smuggling suspected

MSNBC - State's immigrant loan program challenged

MSNBC - State's immigrant loan program challenged

By Michael Muckian
The Business Journal of Milwaukee
Updated: 8:00 p.m. ET May 23, 2004A Republican assemblyman is challenging the Wisconsin Housing & Economic Development Authority's pilot program to provide undocumented immigrants with affordable home mortgages.

State Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-West Bend) wants WHEDA to end the program as of the agency's May 21 board meeting or face the threat of legislation curtailing its ability to provide mortgage loans to undocumented immigrants. The move by Grothman, Assembly majority caucus vice chairman since 1999, comes at a time when financial services providers nationwide are working to remove barriers to such loans.

In late April, WHEDA started the program that provides mortgage loans to undocumented immigrants through three Milwaukee banks and one bank in Madison. The loans use individual taxpayer identification numbers, rather than Social Security numbers for borrower identification.

The program targets recently arrived Hispanics who are not U.S. citizens and lack valid Social Security numbers.

The banks have been writing loans to undocumented workers for several years, keeping the loans within their own portfolios. WHEDA's involvement gives the program considerably more clout, offering loans through participating banks at more competitive interest rates, thus increasing the number of potential borrowers. Rates for WHEDA loans, offered at a 5.75 interest rate on May 19, stand to be one percentage point or more less than similar loans banks provide for undocumented workers.

The WHEDA program capitalizes on population trends that show a rapid rise in immigrants, both documented and undocumented, said Antonio Riley, WHEDA's executive director. WHEDA research shows one-third of the work force nationwide consists of immigrant workers with tax identification rather than Social Security numbers, which obligate them to pay income taxes without getting social benefits, he said.

"Do we want them to be poor without assets and fall victim to predatory lenders?" he said.

WHEDA hasn't yet made any such loans, but several are in the pipeline, Riley said. Since many borrowers are likely to be immigrants unfamiliar with the U.S. financial system, the agency has added financial literacy to its regular monthly homebuyer seminars as part of the new program, he said.

WHEDA's involvement falls in line with other government agencies, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which supports individual taxpayer ID loans, said Michael Frias, a spokesman with the FDIC's Chicago office. The Department of Housing and Urban Development also has proposed legislation requiring Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to accept a higher percentage of loans from low-income borrowers. The two quasi-government mortgage agencies are considering taxpayer ID loans to help meet this requirement, he said.

Despite such trends, Grothman wants WHEDA to cease writing taxpayer ID loans altogether.

"We have honest people waiting years to become citizens, hard-working immigration employees protecting our borders and we're going to give low-interest loans to illegals," he said.

WHEDA board chairman Perry Armstrong, appointed by Gov. Jim Doyle, agreed with Grothman in principle, but reserved judgment of the program until finding out more at the May 21 meeting.

"This is just a pilot program and doesn't yet have a permanent place in WHEDA's arsenal," said Armstrong, chief executive officer of Preferred Title L.L.C., a Madison title insurance company.

WHEDA board member Geoff Hurtado, a first-generation Mexican-American and owner of Hurtado Consulting L.L.C., Milwaukee, said the agency is accomplishing its mission through immigrant loans, which are offered at the same rate as regular WHEDA loans.

"It's consistent with WHEDA's intent to provide a hand up rather than a handout," he said.

Grothman planned to speak at WHEDA's May 21 meeting in Madison.

Bank list
WHEDA program participants include Mitchell Bank, Milwaukee; Guaranty Bank, Brown Deer; North Shore Bank, Brookfield; and First Federal Capital Corp., La Crosse, which was recently purchased by Associated Banc-Corp, Green Bay.

"No decision has been made as to whether Associated will participate in the program," said Associated spokesman Jon Drayna.

Area bank executives involved in WHEDA's pilot said they'll continue granting loans if the agency is forced to abandon the program.

"If WHEDA backs out, we simply would have less capacity to make the loans," said James Maloney, chairman of Mitchell Bank.

Mitchell, which serves Milwaukee's largely Hispanic near south side, has made immigrant loans for the past two years. Mitchell currently holds 35 mortgages worth $2 million on its books, said Maloney. The bank can go as high as $5 million worth of such mortgages before capping the program due to underwriting requirements.

North Shore Bank has 30 immigrant loans worth an estimated $2 million, said Don Cohen, North Shore's vice president of community lending. Under WHEDA, the bank expects that amount to increase to $1 million in loans per month, he said.

Grothman's opposition to the program focuses specifically on WHEDA's involvement and the legislator won't initially address the legality of the loans themselves.

"I wouldn't necessarily want to restrict banks from making immigrant loans, but it's definitely something to look into," he said.

Legislative resistance to immigrant loans at any level runs the risk of undermining efforts to strengthen and develop low-income neighborhoods that are traditional homes to immigrants, said Maria Monreal-Cameron, president and chief executive officer of the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

"I don't understand why there's always such strong opposition to anything that will help a new wave of immigrants," Monreal-Cameron said. "I think WHEDA is to be applauded for its creative solution."

Lack of understanding may be driving resistance to such programs, said North Shore's Cohen.

"If legislators had all the information, they wouldn't oppose the program," he said.

Prostitute smuggling suspected

Prostitute smuggling suspected

Prostitute smuggling suspected

5-22-04

By Russ Rizzo Staff Writer
News & Record




GREENSBORO -- Twenty- one Mexican immigrants arrested in Greensboro this week are suspected of participating in a widespread prostitution ring.

Investigators said it could be one of the largest prostitute-smuggling cases the state has uncovered.

The 14 women and seven men were arrested Monday after a private security guard called 911 to report scantily-clad women exchanging money with men in the parking lot of a Home Depot on South Elm-Eugene Street about 5 a.m. Federal immigration agents took them to Jail Central in Charlotte after police learned they were part of a federal prostitution investigation, according to Greensboro police.

They are charged with immigration violations and will be held until the U.S. Attorney's Office decides whether to charge them criminally, said Sue Brown, a spokeswoman for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

An agent investigating the case said he is trying to figure out if the women in the group were forced into prostitution.

"What we're trying to figure out is, is this an organized ring, or is it just people coming here to make money?" said Ken Burkhardt, an agent with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's office in Charlotte. "It could go on both ends of the spectrum: It could be something really big or it could be people just making lots of money. If it's an organized ring forcing them to prostitute, it would be really big."

Officials did not have addresses for the inmates. Their ages range from 16 to 33, according to jail records, but a witness said most of the women looked younger than 18.

Jim Gunn, the Home Depot security guard who tipped off police, said he reported to work at 4:30 a.m. Monday after employees told him that prostitutes had been gathered in the lot before the store opened for several weeks, usually on Monday mornings.

When he arrived, Gunn said, he saw about a dozen cars parked in the front of the lot.

In each car, a man sat in the driver's seat with three to four female passengers, Gunn said. The women -- mostly teenagers in mini-skirts and high-heel shoes -- handed money to the drivers. Then, one by one, the drivers approached a man in a white button-up shirt and blue jeans who stood in front of a white van. They each handed the man in jeans the money they had collected.

"The man driving the big van appeared to be the big pimp, the guy in charge, the guy with the money," said Gunn, a former VICE/narcotics detective in High Point.

The women then got into the van, Gunn said.

Gunn said the scene looked like a prostitution ring. "It looked to be very large-scale," he said.

By the time Greensboro police arrived, about eight cars had left, Gunn said.

Officers ran names of the remaining people into a national database that confirmed Gunn's suspicion: The group was a target in a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigation, said Capt. Rick Ball, who heads Greensboro's VICE/narcotics unit.

Ball said federal agents told him that the city was a stopping point on the group's way to Charlotte from New York and that the group did not operate in Greensboro. The Home Depot is just south of where Interstates 40 and 85 merge.

"This was a meeting place," Ball said. "It was a convenient location for them to meet up for transportation."

Ball said he did not know that Home Depot employees had seen similar activity in the parking lot for three to four weeks.

Sue Ellen Pierce, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney's Office in Charlotte, said she was unaware of any past prostitution-smuggling cases involving more than 20 people in the state's western district.

She said she could not comment on any ongoing investigation.

Lynn Klauer, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney's Office in Greensboro, said the Charlotte investigation is the largest prostitution-smuggling case she has heard of in the state.

Anita McLeod, who oversees federal inmates in Charlotte's Jail Central, recalled one other time, two years ago, when immigration agents held people accused of smuggling prostitutes into the country.

"It wasn't nearly as big as this," McLeod said.

But in California, investigations like the one uncovered this week are becoming common, said Kevin Jeffery, deputy special agent-in-charge for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Los Angeles.

Last month, a federal grand jury indicted four people suspected of smuggling undocumented Mexican women into California and forcing them to work as prostitutes.

"It's a much bigger problem than most people realize," Jeffrey said. "The folks that are doing this are very ruthless. These women are very fearful. ... It's slavery."

In Greensboro, detectives are investigating one business and one house they suspect are being used as brothels similar to the one discovered in Los Angeles, Ball said.

"These girls have this image that they're going to come here and be able to send money home and build themselves a life, and they're basically locked up in a hellhole," Ball said. "It's a very nasty, difficult situation, and it's very difficult to uncover."

Gunn said he is used to seeing prostitutes roam the area around Home Depot early in the morning. But normally they are older than the ones he saw Monday, and they aren't herded into a white van by a man in blue jeans, he said.

"It made me wonder, 'Where's their parent?' " Gunn said. "It just looked like those girls were being exploited."




Contact Russ Rizzo at 373-7021 or rrizzo@news-record.com

L.A. Daily News - New Bill would allow deportation of Matricula Consular ID Users

L.A. Daily News - News
Bill would allow deportation of people with foreign IDs


By Lisa Friedman
Washington Bureau


WASHINGTON -- Presenting a foreign-issued identification card to federal authorities would be reason enough for deportation under legislation Rep. Elton Gallegly, R-Thousand Oaks, introduced Friday.

The bill represents Gallegly's latest effort to restrict the Mexican "matricula consular" cards that are issued by the thousands each month in Los Angeles alone, and which local governments increasingly accept as a valid form of ID.

By amending the Immigration and Naturalization Act, Gallegly also would bar any illegal immigrant who was deported for using a foreign identification card from re-entering the U.S. for 10 years.

"It would mean a federal agency could not accept this as a form of identification," Gallegly said. "Clearly, the only person that needs this card is someone who is here illegally in the United States."

While groups that work against illegal immigration praised Gallegly's bill, the National Immigration Law Center called it "an outrageous proposal."

"It's very draconian and punitive and arbitrary," said Linton Joaquin, the center's interim executive director based in Los Angeles. "I question whether it's legal."

Joaquin also challenged the assumption that presenting a matricula card necessarily means one is in the U.S. illegally.

According to the legislation, presenting a consular identification card "shall be prima facie evidence that the alien is deportable." The immigrant would have to prove that he or she is in the country legally and should not be deported.

The bill does not impose any requirements upon federal officials or others who may be presented with a matricula card to turn someone over for deportation. But, Gallegly said, "it sends up a red flag that would cause authorities to check your immigration status."

Mike Hethman, staff counsel for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, a Washington, D.C.-based group that works to block illegal immigration, called the bill "very helpful."

"It will cut off the burgeoning practice of local and state governments defying the federal government over immigration policy."

Congress has in the past approved modest measures overseeing the use of matricula cards, including one by Gallegly demanding Mexico share its database of card holders with the U.S.

Previous efforts to restrict the card, however, have gone nowhere. Last year, Gallegly introduced a bill that would have prohibited the federal government from recognizing all foreign-issued identification cards except passports.

Lisa Friedman, (202) 662-8731 lisa.friedman@langnews.com

Illegal Aliens in Cyprus



Illegal immigrant haul in Greece-bound trucks
By Staff Reporter

LIMASSOL police were last night looking into the discovery of 16 foreigners who had been hiding under two refrigerated trucks loaded in a ship ready to sail for Greece.

The foreigners were found by the ship’s second in command late yesterday afternoon and just minutes before the vessel sailed for the port of Piraeus.

The group, mostly Indians and Pakistanis, had come to Cyprus as students or were illegal immigrants, some of whom crossed over from the occupied north.

They were hiding in groups of eight inside special containers under two refrigerated trucks.
The only things they had with them were water and crisps, it was reported.

Police arrested the men and questioned them to determine if the attempt was a one-off or if it had happened before.

Police were also looking into who could possibly be behind the unprecedented incident.
Meanwhile, a crackdown on illegal immigrants over the last 24 hours has led to the arrest of 27 foreigners police said yesterday.

According to a police bulletin, 27 illegal immigrants were arrested during an island-wide operation on charges of illegal entry into the Republic, working without a work permit and staying in Cyprus without a pink slip.

According to the police, eight people were arrested for not having renewed their visas, 17 for working illegally, and two were nabbed while attempting to enter Cyprus illegally.

New York Daily News - Home - Immigs rail-rudded

New York Daily News - Home - Immigs rail-rudded

Immigs rail-rudded

Subway ads law firm ripped in court

By HELEN PETERSON
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Maybe this law firm should change its number to 1-800-NASTY.
The Manhattan firm, Wilens and Baker, and its name partner, Lawrence Wilens, deserve public censure for being rude to clients and neglecting their cases, according to an appeals court.

Wilens and Baker is the firm behind the subway ads imploring passengers to phone 1-800-DIVORCE, 1-800-BANKRUPT and 1-800-IMMIGRATION for legal help.

The five-judge panel of the Appellate Division on Thursday rejected the firm's plea for a private reprimand after it admitted 19 violations of New York's Code of Professional Responsibility. Wilens himself admitted to eight code violations. The censure is the equivalent of a public scolding.

Most of the bad behavior, which occurred between 1998 and 2002, was directed at low-income undocumented immigrants who did not speak English. When they asked about their cases, they were met with demands for money and denied information until payment was made, according to court papers. If they could not pay, they were often yelled at and ordered to leave.

In one case, Wilens followed the wife of a client to an elevator and yelled at her even though she was with her three children, according to the New York Law Journal.

The Law Journal also reported that Wilens called one client an "animal" and made an obscene gesture at him, and derogatorily suggested that a man seeking help for his wife was a homosexual.

The court held that "it would be particularly inappropriate to impose private discipline against an attorney or law firm that engages in a pattern of misconduct involving rude and discourteous behavior to clients - conduct that strikes at the very heart of a lawyer's or law firm's relationship to the public."

In asking for private censure, a lawyer for the firm noted that Wilens had completed an anger-management therapy program, apologized to his wronged clients and reimbursed their fees, and instituted significant changes aimed at improving behavior throughout the firm.

In a statement yesterday, the firm said it regrets "these incidents and, from appointing staff dedicated solely to client relations, to sensitivity training, we're doing everything we can to provide the highest quality service to our clients."



5 U.S. senators join effort to win immigrant's freedom

5 U.S. senators join effort to win immigrant's freedom

5 U.S. senators join effort to win immigrant's freedom
By SUSAN ELAN
THE JOURNAL NEWS
(Original publication: May 22, 2004)

Five prominent Democratic senators have joined Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Charles Schumer of New York in calling for the release of a Pakistani pizza deliveryman detained in a federal prison near Buffalo for 2 1/2 years in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Sens. Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.; Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vt.; Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass.; Richard J. Durbin, D-Ill.; and Jon S. Corzine, D-N.J., yesterday urged Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge to release Ansar Mahmood, 26, an immigrant who lived and worked legally in Hudson, N.Y.

The Journal News first reported in September on Mahmood's struggle to overcome a deportation order.

In January, Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., became the first high-profile politician to add his support to a Hudson Valley citizens group that has sought to free Mahmood by lobbying public officials, circulating petitions and holding rallies.

The five senators yesterday asked Ridge to allow Mahmood to remain in the United States under a form of probation. Mahmood has several offers of housing and employment in Columbia County, the upstate community where he lived after winning an immigration visa in a diversity lottery in April 2000. By working up to 14 hours a day delivering pizzas, he earned enough money to move his parents and younger sisters out of poverty in Pakistan.

"Preventing future terrorist attacks must be one of the highest priorities for our nation," the senators wrote yesterday, adding "these efforts should be both effective and conducted within the parameters set by the U.S. Constitution."

Their letter points out that "hundreds of Muslim and Arab immigrants were rounded up and detained on immigration violations within days and weeks of the September 11th attacks." However, "none of these individuals were charged with terrorism." Instead, "they were held in custody under a cloud of suspicion and many were later deported for immigration violations."

In June 2003, the Justice Department's own inspector general issued a report critical of "this mass roundup and detention policy," the senators reminded Ridge. They quoted the inspector general, noting that "it is unlikely that most if not all of the individuals arrested would have been pursued by law enforcement" had it not been for the Sept. 11th investigation. Rather, the report states, "some appear to have been arrested more by virtue of chance encounters."

An FBI investigation of Mahmood indicates that he poses no security threat, the senators said.

Susan Davies, an organizer of the Ansar Mahmood Defense Committee, said yesterday by phone from Columbia County, that the support from the senators, all of whom, except Corzine, are members of the Senate's Judiciary Committee, lends substantial weight to the movement started in the community of blue-collar workers, farmers and antiques dealers.

Department of Homeland Security spokesman William Strassberger, however, said it would take a full pardon or a bill sponsored by a member of Congress on Mahmood's behalf for him to remain in the United States with the privileges of a permanent resident, including the right to work and to re-enter the country after travel abroad.

Mahmood's troubles began in October 2001 when he asked a security guard at the Hudson reservoir to snap a photo of him against a backdrop of brilliant fall foliage. The scene, unbeknownst to him, included a water treatment facility.

Mahmood was arrested on suspicion of tampering with the water supply but was quickly cleared of the charge. During a police search of his home, however, it was discovered that he had co-signed an apartment lease and registered a car for Pakistani friends who had overstayed their tourist visas.

Mahmood said he was unaware that the couple were in the United States illegally, but he followed his public defender's advice and pleaded guilty in hopes that the court would show him sympathy.

Mahmood received five years' probation on the charge of "harboring aliens" and under immigration law became subject to deportation. He was placed in detention in January 2002. Mahmood recently dropped his court battle to remain in the United States and is asking for supervised release back to Hudson instead.



Send e-mail to Susan Elan

Borders, Trucks, Citizenship, Sanctuary -- May 2004 Phyllis Schlafly Report

Borders, Trucks, Citizenship, Sanctuary -- May 2004 Phyllis Schlafly Report

Borders, Trucks, Citizenship, Sanctuary


Join our
Message
Board

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discuss this and many other topics on our Message Board


Unsafe Life on the Border
The television news media bring us daily, graphic reports from Iraq, where valiant Americans are battling danger, death and destruction of property. So why don't we get coverage about similar dramatic and scary confrontations taking place on the U.S. border?
The compelling truth about the danger and devastation on America's southern border is crying out to be told. Americans need to hear from the likes of Erin Anderson, whose family homesteaded in Cochise County on the Arizona-Mexico border in the late 1880s.

Ms. Anderson says these American pioneers can't live on their own property any more because it's too dangerous. They can't ranch it. They can't sell it. It isn't safe to go on their own property without a gun, a cell phone, and a two-way radio. Their land has been stolen from them by illegal aliens while public officials turn a deaf ear.

Cochise County in the Tucson sector is the major smuggling route for illegal aliens and drugs, and literally thousands cross every night. The Border Patrol admits to apprehending one out of five illegals, but many think it's only one out of ten.

The number of illegal aliens apprehended on the southern border jumped 25% in the first three months of 2004 compared with last year. In Tucson the increase was 51%, in Yuma, it was 60%. The news of President Bush's amnesty proposal spread like wildfire as far south as Brazil. After Border Patrol agents reported that the illegals said the amnesty proposal had prompted them to come, U.S. agents were told not to ask the question any more.

Ms. Anderson says that American landowners watch in horror as their lands, water troughs and tanks, and animals are destroyed. The daily trampling of thousands of feet has beaten the ground into a hard pavement on which no grass will grow for the cattle.

Places that the illegals use as layover sites, where they rest or wait for the next ride, are littered with mountains of trash, garbage, open latrines, and plastic bags, diapers and wrappers of all kinds. When indigenous wildlife and cattle eat the plastic and refuse, they die, so the residents try to clean up the sites as often as they can.

The large number of discarded medicine wrappers indicates the prevalence of disease among the illegals. It is estimated that 10% of all illegals are carriers of Chagas, a potentially fatal disease that is widespread in Central America.

Sometimes the Americans who clean up the sites pick up pocket trash: scraps of paper with the name and phone number of the illegal alien's destination in the United States. This indicates that these border crossings are a very well organized migration.

Other suspicious items picked up by local residents include Muslim prayer rugs and notebooks written in both Arabic and Spanish. These items came from OTMs (Other Than Mexicans) and a subcategory called Special Interest Aliens, who are illegals coming from terrorist sponsoring countries.

The increased crime rate is frightening. Arizona has the highest rate of car theft in the nation, and residents risk home invasion and personal attacks. The increase in violence is very intimidating to American residents. They are afraid to speak out because someone takes note of who they are and where they live, and gives that information to smuggler cartels in Mexico.

People-smuggling by men known as coyotes has piggybacked on the already well established drug smuggling networks and infrastructure, and has become the third largest source of income for organized crime. Drug smuggling and human smuggling are now interchangeable.

Smuggling has become a recognized industry in Mexico. The smuggling route is very mechanized, and some northern Mexican villages have become known as smuggling industry towns. Illegals fly or take a bus from anywhere in Mexico or Central America to an industry town like Altar in the northern region. They are driven to the Arizona border, walk a few miles across the border, and then are picked up by shuttle buses which take them north to Tucson or Phoenix.

Shuttle buses are common carriers, so they are not required to ask for citizenship ID as the airlines do. Often the coyotes take their passengers to stash houses in Phoenix and then hold them for ransom even though they have already paid their smuggling fee.

People smuggling is so lucrative and pervasive that it is corrupting some local American high school kids. Youngsters can make thousands of dollars a week by picking up illegal aliens on the road and driving them to the Phoenix airport.

When is the Bush Administration going to put troops on our southern border to stop these crimes, and when are the media going to interview Erin Anderson and other Arizonans so the American people can know what is really going on?


NAFTA Override U.S. Constitution?
The constitutional issues involved in NAFTA (the North American Free Trade Agreement), passed a decade ago, have just ascended the ladder to the U.S. Supreme Court. Arguments were heard April 21 on whether the non-U.S. tribunals created by NAFTA can require our government to violate federal law in order to comply with foreign rulings.

The issue is whether Mexican trucks can have open access to U.S. highways even though they don't comply with U.S. regulations. For several years, this has been a controversy in Congress, where the decision ought to be made since the U.S. Constitution gives Congress exclusive power "to regulate commerce with foreign nations."

On February 6, 2001, a five-member international tribunal established by NAFTA declared the United States to be in breach of its obligations to Mexico because of restrictions on the entry of foreign trucks. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) ignored U.S. domestic statutes (including the National Environmental Protection Act and the Clean Air Act) and ordered implementation of the decision.

Mexican trucks have so far been permitted to enter only a 20-mile zone on our southern border. Their contents are then transferred to U.S. trucks for delivery in the United States.

The NAFTA tribunal ordered the United States to lift its restrictions on foreign trucks, mandating full access by Mexican trucks across the entire United States. This ruling repeatedly referred to NAFTA as a "treaty" and relied on interpretations of past treaties as justification for the decision.

But NAFTA is not a treaty. It was never submitted to the Senate as a treaty and did not receive the two-thirds majority vote that treaty ratification requires, but instead was enacted in 1993 by a congressional law passed by a simple majority.

Implicitly at stake in this case is whether congressional bypass of the Treaty Clause (Article II, Section 2) can bind the United States as fully as a treaty does. Our system of federalism is also vulnerable, due to the deference historically given to treaties over the rights of the states.

The Ninth Circuit decision (from which the government is appealing) correctly required DOT to comply with domestic laws by preparing an environmental impact statement prior to allowing Mexican trucks to traverse U.S. roads. Any impact statement should evaluate the Mexican trucks' adverse effect not only on nature but also on human safety.

We need an analysis not only of pollution caused by truck emissions and the wear and tear on our highways, but also of the loss of life from trucks and drivers that do not meet U.S. standards. Mexican trucks are older, heavier, and more dangerous than U.S. trucks.

Mexican drivers are less familiar with our roads and language and drive longer hours than U.S. drivers for much lower wages. The loss of life from a predictable increase in accidents should be included in the environmental impact statement.

Deaths caused by language incompatibility, such as misunderstanding road signs or directions, are an essential element of an impact analysis. The most tragic and costly truck accident in midwest history, resulting in the incineration of Rev. Scott Willis's six children in 1994, was caused by the Mexican truck driver's inability to comprehend warnings in the English language.

Fatal accidents involving foreigners unfamiliar with our roads, our rules of the road, and the English language are tragically frequent in states far from our southern border such as Colorado and Iowa. Often vans crammed with illegal aliens are driven by "coyotes" who are paid thousands of dollars per person to transport them hundreds of miles north of the border.

The impact statement should also include the increased quantity of illicit drugs coming into the United States in Mexican trucks, much of it headed for "transshipment" sites in North or South Carolina or Georgia. U.S. Attorney Frank Whitney said that, even at the present time, "It's virtually impossible for the border patrol or customs to truly check every one of these vehicles."

In its Petition, the government argued that it would be more efficient to open our borders to trucks from Mexico and that the Ninth Circuit decision should be reversed because it protects "inefficient procedures." We are not impressed with the government's effort to rank efficiency higher than the U.S. Constitution, sovereignty, and laws.

In this Supreme Court case, the government is maintaining that its decision to open up our highways to Mexican trucks is an act of executive discretion, but in fact it is simply complying with an international tribunal never authorized by any treaty. To allow the executive branch to enforce this decision would set a very dangerous precedent for permitting the rulings of other foreign courts in Geneva, the Hague, or Brussels to bypass both the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. judiciary.


Who Is an American Citizen?
In a world of inhumanity, war and terrorism, American citizenship is a very precious possession. It affords rights that residents of other countries can only dream of.

So who is eligible to claim American citizenship? The U.S. Supreme Court may soon consider that question.

Yasser Esam Hamdi was captured as an enemy combatant during the American military operation in Afghanistan. When interviewed by a U.S. interrogation team, Hamdi identified himself as a Saudi citizen who had been born in the United States.

Now that he has been detained, he contradicts that by claiming to be a citizen of the United States based on his birth in Baton Rouge, Louisiana to Saudi Arabian parents. There is no evidence that his parents intended to settle in the United States, or even that they had a right to do so.

Hamdi was residing in Afghanistan when he was captured. His father, Esam Fouad Hamdi, joined the lawsuit from his country of Saudi Arabia.

Section 1401(a) of Title 8 of the United States Code defines a U.S. citizen as "a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof." This law uses the same language as the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

There is no evidence that Hamdi or his parents ever consented to be subject to the sovereignty of the United States, or sought to settle in the United States or to renounce their Saudi Arabian citizenship. All evidence is that they retained allegiance to Saudi Arabia.

Birth on U.S. territory has never been an absolute claim to citizenship. The Fourteenth Amendment does not automatically extend to children born to alien parents at war with the United States, or to the children of diplomatic agents, or to American Indians, or to illegal aliens. If it did, American Indians would automatically have been American citizens since they were born on what is U.S. territory. But Indians who belong to tribes were not citizens until given that status by Congress.

The Supreme Court held in 1884 in Elk v. Wilkins that "Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States, members of, and owing immediate allegiance to, one of the Indian tribes (an alien, though dependent, power), although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more 'born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,' within the meaning of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment, than the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government, or the children born within the United States, of ambassadors or other public ministers of foreign nations."

The logic of this decision applies with equal force to visitors or aliens who remain loyal to foreign powers. The Fourteenth Amendment did not change this.

In the 1942 case called In re: Thenault, a federal court ruled: "Of course, the mere physical fact of birth in the country does not make these children citizens of the United States, inasmuch as they were at that time children of a duly accredited diplomatic representative of a foreign state. This is fundamental law and within the recognized exception not only to the Constitutional provision relative to citizenship, Amendment Article 14, Section 1, but to the law of England and France and to our own law, from the very first settlement of the Colonies."

In supporting passage of the Fourteenth Amendment, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lyman Trumbull explained that the jurisdictional language in the Citizenship Clause "means 'subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.' ... [Are] the Navajo Indians subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States? By no means. We make treaties with them. ... It cannot be said of any Indian who owes allegiance, partial allegiance if you please, to some other Government ... that he is 'subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.' ... It is only those persons who come completely within our jurisdiction, who are subject to our laws, that we think of making citizens."

The extensive litigation concerning American Indians illustrates that consent rather than place of birth is what controls citizenship. Indians did not receive citizenship until conferred by congressional acts in 1887, 1901, and 1924, long after ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Constitution states that "no person except a natural born citizen" is eligible to be President. Everyone recognizes that this provision disqualifies the Governors of California and Michigan who were born in Austria and Canada, respectively.

On the other hand, then Michigan Governor George Romney, whose birthplace was Mexico, ran for president in 1968, and Senator John McCain, whose birthplace was the Panama Canal Zone, ran for president in 2000. Both were "natural born citizens" because their parents were U.S. citizens and subject to the jurisdiction of American sovereignty.

It's not the physical location of birth that defines citizenship, but whether your parents are citizens, and the express or implied consent to jurisdiction of the sovereign. The facts and the law argue against American citizenship for Hamdi.


Giving Criminals a Sanctuary
A favorite argument of those who support amnesty for illegal aliens is: current laws can't be enforced (like Prohibition and the 55-mile-an-hour speed limit) so we might as well adjust to reality. That's about like telling a woman, you can't fight your rapist, so relax and enjoy it. There must be a better solution.

Any comparison of the invasion of illegal aliens with Prohibition or the 55-mile speed limit is totally false. The American people wanted both those laws repealed, but the American people, by a wide margin, want our immigration laws enforced.

That's why Senators Jeff Sessions (R-AL) and Zell Miller (D-GA) held a hearing last week on their Homeland Security Enhancement Act (S.1906) to promote cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities. It's a reflection on the peculiar times we live in that we even need such a law, but the failure of federal and state law-enforcement personnel to cooperate to protect us from crimes committed by illegal aliens is as dangerous as the now-famous failure of the CIA and the FBI to talk to each other about terrorists.

Rep. Charlie Norwood (R-GA) is the sponsor of a similar bill called the CLEAR Act (H.R. 2671) to give state and local authorities the power to routinely enforce federal immigration laws. The bill has 120 co-sponsors and is one border security bill that has a chance to pass this year.

The numbers tell us why this cooperation is essential. Our fewer than 2,000 federal immigration agents cannot possibly cope with the problems caused by 10 million illegal aliens. We don't want to hire a half million new federal agents.

The answer is to use the police officers who walk their beats and drive our highways and who come into contact with illegal aliens every day. The feds desperately need the eyes, ears, and cooperation of our 650,000 state and local police officers.

The open-borders lobby is vehemently opposed to this sensible cooperation. Many cities and other local units of government have adopted so-called "sanctuary" laws or policies to forbid local police to ask anyone whether they are legally in the United States.

Police officers who suspect violations of immigration law are often prohibited from detaining illegal aliens or contacting federal immigration authorities. Sanctuary laws even forbid police to report immigration violations to federal authorities.

We've seen numerous examples of illegal aliens who were stopped by the local police but then set free to commit their crimes instead of being deported, such as the notorious gang rape of a mother of two in Queens, New York by three illegal aliens who had been arrested numerous times but never turned over to the immigration agency. The most famous example is D.C.-area sniper Lee Malvo, who was caught by local law-enforcement in Seattle, identified as an illegal who should be deported, but then set free by the feds.

Three of the 9/11 hijackers, including the ringleader Mohammed Atta, had been stopped and ticketed for significant traffic violations, such as driving without a license and speeding at 90 m.p.h. Thousands of innocent lives could have been saved through closer cooperation between local police and immigration authorities.

The Los Angeles police department is handcuffed by Special Order 40, which prohibits the police from asking anyone they arrest about his immigration status unless the suspect is already charged with committing a felony. The police may not notify immigration authorities about an illegal alien picked up for minor violations, even though it's well known that enforcing laws against minor crimes often prevents a major crime.

The 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act makes it unlawful for any municipality to restrict its employees from reporting illegal aliens to federal authorities, and allows the federal government and local police to work together under specific written agreements. A few local agencies have reached such agreements, and Virginia just became the third state to give its state police more authority to detain illegal aliens.

Former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, trying to defend his city's sanctuary policy, fought against that law all the way to the Supreme Court. He lost in court, but Mayor Michael Bloomberg's "don't ask, don't tell" rule continues to skirt around the 1996 law.

There are 400,000 illegal aliens walking our streets who are under standing deportation orders (known as absconders), of whom 80,000 are criminal aliens and nearly 3,800 are from countries with known Al Qaeda presence. The L.A. police department has more than 1,200 outstanding warrants for illegal aliens on homicide charges.

The foreign born are 30% of federal prisoners. The big-city gangs are mostly foreign born, and their viciousness is illustrated by the 16-year-old who lay in wait and killed a California police officer on April 21. The murder was the boy's admission ticket to the 12th Street Pomona gang, which has ties to the Mexican Mafia.

The CLEAR Act and the Homeland Security Enhancement Act will give our beleaguered law enforcement officials more tools to combat terrorists, gangs, and other criminals. Tell your Member of Congress to act now.

Arrests, deaths surge along border | www.azstarnet.com �

Arrests, deaths surge along border | www.azstarnet.com �

By Michael Marizco
ARIZONA DAILY STAR

ALTAR, Sonora - Mexican nationals crossing illegally into Arizona are dying at nearly three times the rate of last year - the deadliest year on record - in part because their anticipation of amnesty has created a spike in the number of people moving across the border.

More than 100,000 more illegal entrants have already been arrested in the deserts of Southern Arizona since Oct. 1 than in the same period a year ago , while the United States finishes putting the $10 million Arizona Border Control Initiative in place.

Coyotes - human smugglers - are responding to the U.S. promise of controlling the border by raising their fees and promising to take people through more treacherous routes, such as the mountain passes between Lukeville and Yuma, where 14 illegal entrants died three years ago.

The bodies of 61 people have been found in Arizona's desert around Tucson since Oct. 1, reports from the Mexican government show. For the same time last year, there were 21 known deaths.

Bodies have been found from the border near Nogales to as far north as Marana, 75 miles away. The data are collected by Mexico's Ministry of the Interior.

The Border Patrol, because it does not keep track of bodies other agencies find, counts 29 dead in the Tucson Sector, which covers most of Arizona.

During the same time, apprehensions jumped 60 percent to 277,000, said Rob Griffin, spokesman for the U.S. Border Patrol's Tucson Sector. The surge is happening in all parts of the sector and accounts for more than half of the 525,000 arrested along the entire U.S.-Mexican border.

The Border Patrol is reacting by bringing in two drone planes, four more helicopters and 290 more agents to better control the border as part of a border initiative that will be fully implemented by June 1 and last through the summer.

Antonio Manriquez, a coyote in Altar, grinned when asked if the initiative is going to blow his plans for smuggling illegal entrants into the United States this summer.

"We'll find a way; we always do," said the clean-cut smuggler with smiling eyes, as he calmly stirred his cup of coffee in a restaurant in this dry, dusty town three hours from Tucson.

Manriquez, who has worked the Altar-to-Sasabe corridor as a smuggler for two years, is still contemplating the best routes to avoid the promised increase in agents and equipment along the Arizona-Mexico border.

"Sasabe is an easier place to cross through than the west because there is less sand to wade through," he said. "There is shade, trees and one can hide more easily. But we can move through Sonoyta (Sonora), certainly."

He and other smugglers will raise the price to cross migrants. Right now, a Mexican will pay about $1,500 for the trip; Manriquez says he will be charging as high as $2,500 once summer begins.

Another change in tactics is setting up safe houses in Sonoyta and Sasabe and moving small numbers of people across, he said. Safe houses, common in Phoenix, are used to hide large numbers of smuggled migrants before moving them to another city.

Smugglers are also gathering migrants and selling them to other smugglers even before the people cross the border, said the Rev. Rene Castañeda Castro, a local priest who runs the only migrant shelter in Altar.

"I watch the buses pull up, and two or three men approach, arguing prices with the people. It's like an auction," he said.

The Border Patrol has already deployed 110 more agents and its four helicopters along the border, said Customs and Border Protection spokesman Roger Maier.

Sweeping across the desert, agents are deploying into the roughest terrains to the east and west of Tucson, gaining control over sections of the desert, then moving on and leaving agents behind to secure the ground they've controlled.

"It's the old gain control, maintain control, expand control," he said.

The men and women waiting at the church plaza in Altar to be smuggled into the United States haven't heard of any increased security at the border this summer. It's the promise of amnesty if they get to the United States right now that's drawing them.

Their hope and resolve to enter quickly come from the guest worker plan President Bush announced in January. It doesn't really offer amnesty, but it's been perceived that way in Mexico . In fact, Bush's announcement offers only the opportunity to work in the United States for three to six years before eventually applying for citizenship, but it hasn't advanced beyond the announcement stage.

"Bush's offer is adding to the numbers," said Francisco Garcia Aten, the former mayor of Altar who has watched migrants overrun his town as far back as 1998.

"Now was the time to cross. The time is not as hot, and I have an opportunity to work," said Carlos Matias De Leon, 23, who came to Altar from Chiapas, as he climbed into a van headed for Sasabe.

Lupe Rivas, a 22-year-old with family in Florida, agreed.

"They want us to work, don't they? If they didn't, they wouldn't be offering work," she said, sitting on the edge of the plaza.

Mexican officials predict the increase in enforcement in Arizona is going to push the flow of migration out toward the Sonoyta, Sonora, area where the western edges of Pima County meet Mexico and east toward Coahuila, Mexico, south of Big Bend, Texas.

"There is no vigilance in those areas, and I believe they will change their tendencies to cross through Arizona toward where there is little enforcement," said Jorge Luis Mireles Navarro, regional migration delegate in Sonora for Mexico's National Migration Institute.

"Both countries tighten the sides of the border, and the smugglers seek the vulnerable point. They're already looking for other areas to cross."

In Sasabe, Grupo Beta agents say they have counted 56,000 people riding in on the 10- and 15-passenger vans - double last year's numbers, said agency commander Carlos Amador Zozaya Moreno.

"We hope the number will begin to dwindle as the temperatures increase," he said.

Not likely, says Castañeda Castro, the priest in Altar.

"Illegal immigration is growing and growing," he said. "It's like a giant snowball now and you can't stop it."


° Contact reporter Michael Marizco at 573-4213 or mmarizco@azstarnet.com.

Friday, May 21, 2004

reviewjournal.com -- Opinion: EDITORIAL: System failure

reviewjournal.com -- Opinion: EDITORIAL: System failure

Friday, May 21, 2004
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

EDITORIAL: System failure

Felony DUI suspect should have been deported long ago







The attorney for Nicolas Serrano-Villagrana will contend the illegal alien -- held in lieu of $500,000 bail on charges he jumped a curb with his truck and crashed into a bus stop on Eastern Avenue near U.S. Highway 95 back on May 3, killing a 4-year-old boy -- is wrongly charged because someone else was driving.

Prosecutors says nine witnesses will testify Serrano-Villagrana was the driver; a jury will eventually decide.

But leaving aside the defense, the most serious question arising from Serrano-Villagrana's arrest is how an illegal alien (even his attorney says he's illegal) could have been busted in this valley on two previous occasions over a period of years for driving under the influence -- and still be on the streets of Las Vegas on May 3.

Is little Angel Avendano dead because nothing is done to drunken drivers; nothing is done to illegal aliens even when they're caught; and -- worst of all -- nothing is done to illegal aliens who are convicted of driving drunk?

And the answer appears to be -- correct on all three.

Technically, anyone arrested -- even for as supposedly "minor" a crime as drunken driving -- should be asked at the jail for place of birth, and also fingerprinted. If the suspect admits he was born outside the country and can't prove he's here legally, or if the fingerprints show he's lying about who he is, the federal Immigration police are supposed to be called, "and arrange for him to leave the country either voluntarily or under an order of deportation," says a knowledgable local immigration attorney.

But Serrano-Villagrana's attorney says his client was never deported. Although local police will call INS to take custody of illegal aliens who are charged with felonies, "I've never had one held for INS -- I've never had Immigration called on one of my clients -- for a misdemeanor," no matter what "official policy" is supposed to be, says Serrano-Villagrana's attorney, Philip Singer.

Anyway, when Serrano-Villagrana was arrested for DUI the second time -- processed through the North Las Vegas jail, convicted and fined -- why wasn't he turned over to federal Immigration & Customs Enforcement (formerly INS) and deported?

And can't something be done either to make deportation a more lasting punishment than the proverbial "revolving door" or to come up with some more effective way to get repeat drunken drivers off the roads -- at least repeat drunken drivers who also turn out to be illegal aliens?

Yes, if he's convicted Nicolas Serrano-Villagrana will do jail time, now. At which point he'll be deported.

Try telling little Angel Avendano and his parents that means everything is OK.

Thursday, May 20, 2004

KGBT 4 - TV Harlingen, TX: Agents Seize $8.1 Million in Marijuana

KGBT 4 - TV Harlingen, TX: Agents Seize $8.1 Million in Marijuana

MAY 19, 2004 - Two significant drugs busts in the Rio Grande Valley net federal agents more than eight million dollars in marijuana.

The first bust was made in Alamo where U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents seized 1,500 pounds of marijuana in a Suburban along the Rio Grande.

Agents say the watched nine people carry large bundles of the drugs to the SUV. When agents approached the suspects then all saw across the river into Mexico.

Aside from the drugs, agents seized two guns and 260 rounds of ammunition. The marijuana is valued at $1,262,000.

Agents from the Rio Grande City sector made their biggest bust of the year when they spotted several vehicles along the Rio Grande in Chapeno, about 25 miles west of Roma.

Once agents stopped the cars, the suspects fled.

Inside the six vehicles agents found 490 bundles of marijuana that weighed 8.584 pounds. The drugs are valued at $6,967,000.

Star Telegram | 05/20/2004 | Jury blames 4 deaths on rock hauler, awards $23.58 million

Star Telegram | 05/20/2004 | Jury blames 4 deaths on rock hauler, awards $23.58 million


Jury blames 4 deaths on rock hauler, awards $23.58 million

By Don Chance

Special to the Star-Telegram


A Wise County jury has awarded $23.58 million to three Paradise families who sued TXI after four relatives died in a collision with one of the company's rock-hauling trucks.

The award, handed down last week, included $16 million in compensation and $7.58 million in punitive damages.

Kim Hughes, 38, her two children, Afton Royse, 17, and Shiloh Hughes, 14, and Kim Hughes' mother, Joyce Watkins, 71, were killed in the collision on Dec. 17, 2002.

Royse's toddler son, Jagr, survived in a car seat.

Decatur lawyer Derek Boyd represented the Hughes, Royse and Watkins families in suing TXI.

"The families are very pleased with the verdict," Boyd said, "but they are most pleased that Kim Hughes was found not at fault."

According to Boyd, on Dec. 17, 2002, TXI rock truck driver Ricardo Rodriguez was hauling a full load eastbound on Texas 114 between U.S. 287 and Interstate 35W.

Texas Industries Inc. is a supplier of construction materials headquartered in Dallas.

Kim Hughes was driving a sport utility vehicle westbound on Texas 114, returning to her Paradise home, when the TXI truck drifted into her lane. After the SUV sideswiped the truck, Hughes lost control, and the vehicle spun into oncoming traffic where it collided with a Ford pickup.

Boyd said that the jury of eight men and four women returned the verdict May 13 in Decatur after about nine hours of deliberation over two days.

Judge John Fostel, of the 271st District Court, said the testimony was highly emotional in the seven-day trial but added that that kind of reaction is not unusual in a case involving deaths within the same family.

The jury, Fostel said, found Hughes completely without fault in the incident, placing 100 percent of the blame on the defendants: Rodriguez; Aurelio Melendez, the truck owner who leased the truck to TXI; and TXI, for hiring Rodriguez, a previously deported undocumented worker, who returned to the United States with falsified identification, and was hired with no background check.

Fostel said that the final award was not unusually high, considering the circumstances of the case.

"It's large," he said. "But there were a lot of parties involved. It wasn't like there was only one plaintiff, and one set of damages."

In his closing argument, Boyd said, the families never asked for a specific amount, although he said what they had asked for early in the proceedings added up to between $30 million and $40 million.

"It was in that range," Boyd said, "but basically, we told the jury it was up to them to decide the damages. They went through the process and came up with the final total."

TXI spokesman Randy Jones declined to speculate on whether the company would appeal. "That's being looked into," he said.

TXI counsel Charles Hurd, of Houston's Fulbright & Jaworski, did not respond to numerous phone calls.

Wednesday, May 19, 2004

KGBT 4 - TV Harlingen, TX: Agents Seize $8.1 Million in Marijuana

KGBT 4 - TV Harlingen, TX: Agents Seize $8.1 Million in Marijuana

MAY 19, 2004 - Two significant drugs busts in the Rio Grande Valley net federal agents more than eight million dollars in marijuana.

The first bust was made in Alamo where U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents seized 1,500 pounds of marijuana in a Suburban along the Rio Grande.

Agents say the watched nine people carry large bundles of the drugs to the SUV. When agents approached the suspects then all saw across the river into Mexico.

Aside from the drugs, agents seized two guns and 260 rounds of ammunition. The marijuana is valued at $1,262,000.

Agents from the Rio Grande City sector made their biggest bust of the year when they spotted several vehicles along the Rio Grande in Chapeno, about 25 miles west of Roma.

Once agents stopped the cars, the suspects fled.

Inside the six vehicles agents found 490 bundles of marijuana that weighed 8.584 pounds. The drugs are valued at $6,967,000.

Africans Detained In Breckenridge Co

Summit Daily News for Breckenridge, Keystone, Copper and Frisco Colorado - News

FBI, immigration officials detain African immigrants

CHRISTINE McMANUS
May 19, 2004

SILVERTHORNE - Federal immigration officers and FBI agents detained an unknown number of immigrants from Africa Wednesday morning with the assistance of the Silverthorne Police Department and the Summit County Sheriff's Office.

At about 9 a.m., police cars, unmarked immigrations vehicles and at least two white immigration vans drove into the quiet neighborhood of Blue River Apartments on Adams Avenue behind Sears, west of Highway 9.

Plain-clothed immigration officers and FBI agents began knocking on doors and asking people for their immigration documents.

At least a dozen black immigrants got into large vans with covered, barred windows, bystanders said.

The FBI would not disclose how many people were detained nor where they were taken from their homes in Silverthorne. The FBI's policy is not to discuss any open investigations, said FBI spokesperson Leslie Kopper.

Kopper said this was a joint investigation among multiple federal and local agencies which identified individuals who were in violation of immigration statutes.

With a federal immigration investigation, any arrests would likely be made in federal security offices in Denver, said Silverthorne Police Chief John Patterson.

Patterson said he did not know who was detained nor how many people were detained.

The FBI and Immigration and Customs Enforcement interviewed multiple people at the town police station throughout the day Wednesday. Some were detained and some were released, Patterson said.

Three bystanders at Blue River Apartments, who did not want to be identified, said the incident was peaceful and professional. They estimated 15-20 people rode away in the vans.

Blue River Apartments property manager Ellen Temby arrived at work at about 10:30 a.m. after residents had already been taken away.

Temby said she initially assumed that officers were checking on people from Mexico. When she learned that African immigrants were detained, she said she was surprised.

"All the African immigrants had Homeland Security documentation and were here legally, to my understanding," Temby said.

"But I do not know much about what happened here this morning because I was not here at the time. No one's told me anything."

Although Temby said she has seen documentation from leasees, she has not met all the residents in the 78-unit complex.

Some residents are from Mauritania and Senegal in northwestern Africa, she said.

Walking by one of the apartments where officers were questioning a resident from Africa, the following was heard.

"You are here because we do not look like regular Americans," said the resident.

"No. There's a lot of people who want to show me documents that look like someone else," the officer said.

Sheriff John Minor said that this was a joint investigation but he did not have any numbers of detainees because his authority does not reach into the realm of immigration regulation.

Minor was at the incident command center at the Silverthorne Town Hall for several hours Wednesday morning.

"This has happened in the past with the INS years ago. But we haven't had anything like this recently," Minor said.

"I am an immigrant from England, and I know that in the 1980s if I didn't have my green card on me at all times, I could be detained."

Oumar Niang, a liaison for the West African community in Summit County, said a cultural event planned on Sunday at the Silverthorne Pavilion will likely be canceled. He will probably hire a lawyer to help any detainees, he said.



Christine McManus can be contacted at (970) 668-3998, ext. 229 or at cmcmanus@summitdaily.com.

Brothers face charges in immigrant's death

Brothers face charges in immigrant's death

Deming-AP) -- Two Mexican brothers are being held in the death of a 32-year-old Mexican woman who collapsed in the desert near Columbus.

Her death marks New Mexico's first documented case of the year in which an illegal immigrant died while crossing the border.

U-S Border Patrol spokesman Doug Mosier said 27-year-old Humberto Chavira Ordones and 26-year-old Baldomero Chavira Ordones face smuggling resulting in death charges.

The woman's name is being withheld because her family has not been notified.

She was found Friday afternoon on a county road in southern Luna County after a member of her group notified a rancher.

She died en route to a hospital. A Border Patrol helicopter helped agents track 13 other immigrants in the desert from footprints found where the woman was left.

Compare Candidates On The Issues

TheLouisvilleChannel.com - Commitment 2004 - Compare Candidates On The Issues

Compare Candidates On The Issues
See Where The Candidates Stand
Issue George W. Bush
Bio | Finances
John Kerry
Bio | Finances
Ralph Nader
Bio | Finances

Abortion - Anti-abortion except in cases of rape, incest or to save woman's life
- Signed ban on partial-birth abortions
- Accepts FDA approval of RU-486, but concerned about overuse
Source: Bush On The Issues | Whitehouse.gov - Supports abortion rights
- Opposes ban on partial-birth abortions
- Voted against ban on abortions at military bases
- Says he would elect pro-choice judges to federal bench
Source: Kerry On The Issues - Supports abortion rights
- Says decision to take RU-486 should be left up to women, not government
- Says Roe v. Wade will never be overturned
Source: Nader On The Issues

Civil Rights - For affirmative action, but against quotas
- Against gay marriage and adoptions, and hate crimes should not apply to gays
- Opposes gays in Boy Scouts
Supports "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"
Source: Bush On Civil Rights - Supports affirmative action
- Opposes same-sex marriages
- Supports benefits for gay couples
- Favors allowing gay military personnel to serve openly in armed forces
Source: Kerry On Civil Rights - Supports affirmative action
- Supports same-sex marriages
- Has supported allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in military
- Has supported strengthening hate crimes legislation
Source: Nader On Civil Rights
Crime - Supports death penalty
- Supports "three-strikes" law and mandatory sentencing for repeat offenders
- Supports ban on automatic weapons and background checks at gun shows
- Supports Second Amendment
Source: Bush On Crime - Opposes death penalty
- Voted against limiting death penalty appeals
- Wants more funding for drug war, treatment
- In favor of background checks at gun shows
- Vows to renew funding for COPS program
- Says "law-abiding adults have the right to own guns"
Source: Kerry On Crime - Says the U.S. needs to crack down on corporate crime, fraud and abuse
- Believes ending drug war will reduce street crime, violence and homicides related to underground drug dealing
- Says drug abuse is a health problem, with social and economic consequences
- Says it is time to bring some illegal drugs within the law by regulating, taxing and controlling them
Source: Nader On Corporate Crime
Defense - Supported war in Iraq
- Ordered limited national missile defense system deployed by 2004
- Has not proposed increasing size of Army
- Would increase military spending 4.2 percent to $380 billion
- Budget funds military pay hikes from 2 percent to 6 percent
- Strategy calls for a focus on new threats, such as terrorism
Source: Bush On National Defense - Supported war in Iraq
- Opposes national missile defense
- Supports increasing size of Army by 40,000 active troops on a temporary basis
- Wants to invest more money in equipment, technology
- Proposes better pay, benefits for military personnel
- Would appoint presidential envoy to buy, destroy weapons stockpiles
Source: Kerry On The Issues - Opposes national missile defense
- Critic of military "overspending"
- Wants to reduce funding for "military industrial complex"
- Supports Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
Source: Nader On The Issues
Economy / Taxes - Says speeding up the 2001 tax cuts will increase the pace of economic recovery and job creation
- Says providing dividend and capital gains tax relief will give small businesses incentives to grow
- Wants $20 billion in aid to states for necessary services
Source: Bush On The Economy - Wants to repeal Bush tax cuts for wealthy
- Would protect increases in child tax credit and reduction in marriage penalty
- Would close corporate loopholes and restrain spending
- Supports increase in minimum wage
Source: Kerry On The Economy - Believes federal tax code skewed in favor of the wealthy and corporations
- Says "Unearned income" (dividents, interest, capital gains) should not be taxed lower than earned income (work)
- Supports retention of the estate tax
Source: Nader On Economy, Taxes
Education - Signed No Child Left Behind Act, which makes federal funding contingent on states' giving standardized tests in math and reading and publishing results for third- through eighth-graders
- Says when it comes to our schools, dollars alone do not always make the difference
- Calls for zero tolerance on disruption, guns, and school safety
- Says federal dollars should not follow failure
Source: Bush On Education - Proposes a National Education Trust Fund to guarantee the federal government meets its obligation to fully fund education priorities
- Vows to change the No Child Left Behind Act to ensure that schools focus on teaching high standards, and not become "drill and kill" test prep institutions
- Says No Child Left Behind underfunds public schools by $6 billion this year
- Chronically disruptive or violent students should be removed from classrooms and placed in alternative learning environments
Source: Kerry On Education - Says students "should learn, as the core curriculum, developing civic skills, learning how to practice democracy, and the arithmetic, reading and writing will be a byproduct."
- Supports schoool choice within public school system
- Wants commercialism out of the classroom
Source: Nader On Education
Energy - Supports more domestic oil, natural gas, coal production
- Supports drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
- Supports 1.5 mpg increase for SUVs, light trucks by 2007
- Proposed $1.7 billion to develop hydrogen-powered fuel cells
Source: Bush's 6-Point Plan - Backs incentives to reduce dependence on fossil fuels
- Opposes drilling in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
- Push new gas requirements, hybrid cars, hydrogen fuel
- Backs renewable energy trust fund to invest in the development of renewable energy will reduce our oil dependence
Source: Kerry On Energy - Opposes oil exploration in Arctic refuge
- Supports investment in renewable energies such as wind, solar power
- Supports promotion of sustainable energy and says the United States should not subsidize energy interests
Source: Nader On Energy
Environment - Opposes stricter standards under Clean Air, Clean Water acts
- Supports market-based solutions to improve air quality
- Opposes Kyoto agreement
- Wants to increase logging in national forests as way to prevent wildfires
Source: Bush On The Environment - Supports enforcement of Clean Air, Clean Water acts
- Supports Kyoto treaty
- Promotes clean, renewable fuel sources, especially ethanol
- Would "reinvigorate" the Superfund cleanup program
Source: Kerry On The Environment - Wants more efficient automobiles, energy sources
- Says toxic standards should be strengthened to address children, not just adults
Source: Nader On Environment
Health Care - Opposes national health care plan
- Supports adding drug benefit to Medicare
- Would place limits on patient lawsuits against HMOs
- Would introduce private sector competition to reduce Medicare costs
Source: Bush On Health Care - Proposes letting people buy coverage in government system
- Voted to allow Canadian prescription drugs to be imported
- Voted for prescription drug coverage under Medicare
- Would tighten rules on drug companies to lower prescription drug costs, with an emphasis on seniors, veterans
- Would allow patients to sue HMOs, collect money for damages
Source: Kerry On Health Care - Says Insurance companies should not administer health care
- Supports single-payer program
- Believes Universal health care addresses issues, lowers drug prices
Source: Nader On Health Care
Homeland Security - Supports labeling of U.S. citizens as "enemy combatants"
- Supports renewal of Patriot Act
- Initially opposed and then supported creation of Homeland Security Department
Source: Bush On The Issues - Against labeling U.S. citizens "enemy combatants"
- Wants Patriot Act to expire without congressional approval
- Would restore funding to COPS program
- Wants funding to hire 100,000 new firefighters
- Says intelligence services need reform
Source: Kerry On The Issues - Wants to Repeal Patriot Act
- Says U.S. should end secret detentions
- Says civilians should not face tribunals
Source: Nader On The Issues
Immigration - Proposed increasing budget to enforce immigration laws
- Proposed temporary worker plan that would target undocumented workers by offering legal status for a three-year period, after which they would be required to return to their countries.
- Says he would encourage undocumented workers to return home by expanding economic opportunities in their countries. Source: Whitehouse.gov - Supports allowing undocumented immigrants to legalize their status if they have been in United States for certain period of time, are employed and can pass a background check
- Says the naturalization process for legal permanent residents serving in armed forces should be expedited
Source: Kerry On The Issues - Says worker permits should be offered
- Opposed to open borders
- Wants to restore safety net
Source: Nader On The Issues
Social Security - Supports investing some Social Security taxes in stocks
- Proposed extending Social Security to include inheritable assets
Source: The President's Plan - Opposes privatizing Social Security
- Says rolling back tax cuts for wealthy Americans will help preserve system
Source: Kerry On The Issues - Says no changes are needed in Social Security because the system is solid
Source: Nader On Social Security

*These issue statments were collected from the candidates' Web sites and campaigns, from speeches and public statements, and news articles.


WVEC.com | News for Hampton Roads, Virginia | Virginia News

WVEC.com | News for Hampton Roads, Virginia | Virginia News

Utah's Cannon Firing on his Own People

The Washington Dispatch


Utah's Cannon Firing on his Own People
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commentary by Frosty Wooldridge
May 19, 2004


It’s called, ‘friendly fire’ in the US Army when our own commanders or Air Force planes accidentally drop bombs on our troops. Nonetheless, death and destruction result to Americans in uniform. It’s the outcome of poor decision making, bad timing or wrong-headed thinking. American troops die by the hands of inept leaders. But the one tragedy about ‘friendly fire’ stems from the fact of wartime trauma. Split second decisions must be made in the face of conflict.



But what is happening to America today is worse. Our own elected officials in Congress proceed with an agenda that aims the deadly guns of immigration with point blank salvos into the heart of America’s mid section. We’re bleeding from one end of the country to the other. California is just about dead. New York City is turning into a polyglot of the Third World. Miami is more Cuban than American and Georgia is an extension of Mexico City. Texas? No one speaks English.



Such are the results of congressional representatives like Chris Cannon of Utah and many others. In the past decade, Cannon, a Republican stood as one of the foremost champions of illegal immigration into America. He introduced every bill possible to aid, assist, abet and encourage illegal immigration into the United States. Today, Utah is over-run with an estimated 65,000 illegal aliens costing Utah taxpayers millions of dollars. Their schools suffer language crisis and medical problems beyond solving.



Aiding and abetting illegal aliens stands in violation of federal immigration laws. But that hasn't stopped men like Cannon from firing on his own people. It hasn’t stopped Senator Orrin Hatch, McCain, Kennedy and dozens of others in our Congress. It’s why we have 13 million illegal aliens free to roam about our country. It’s why we’re in a crisis that will prove more deadly and devastating than ten 9/11’s.



However, last week, Cannon failed to win the nomination for his House seat against Matt Throckmorton. It was called a ‘shocker’ by the Salt Lake City Deseret News.



Why is Cannon in trouble? Could it be he is currently sponsoring five illegal alien amnesty bills that pander to an outlaw constituency? What about the fact that PACs have kicked in $195,188.00 to keep Cannon firing into his own people? Those PACs represent industries that profit from Cannon’s interpretation of the word ‘amnesty’ or by his efforts to raise import quotas on foreign labor like H-1B and L-1 visas. His is the worst type of ‘friendly fire’.



But Cannon’s greatest troubles come from his own gun shooting himself in his own foot.

Cannon, with eight years in Congress, is a member of the Judiciary Committee’s immigration subcommittee. He blocked all legislation to crack down on illegal immigration. He is the darling of the national immigration lawyers association and the Mexican-American Legal Defense Fund. He was celebrated by MALDF, which is one of the most anti-American advocacy groups in the United States. That organization is bent on returning Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California into Mexico as part of their ‘Aztlan Reconquista’. Cannon praised Mexico because it has quadrupled its population in his lifetime. He advocates higher population growth and thinks it is vital to bring in as many immigrants as possible.



It makes you wonder if he possesses the intellectual capacity to understand such a stance, given time, would make America like India, China and Bangladesh. What is the point of that human train wreck relocating in America?



As Lincoln said, “You can fool some of the people some of the time and you can fool all of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all the people all of the time.” Cannon’s latest AgJobs amnesty bill shoots Utah voters with a gut shot. Utah voters shot back with votes for Matt Throckmorton.



Cannon would love flooding Utah with an added 100,000 even 500,000 immigrants. He does not understand limits. If Cannon had his way, he’d open up immigration floodgates to the world. Not only would he create water shortages, language chaos, medical mayhem from illegal aliens--Chris Cannon would kill what it means to be an American citizen. He is in favor of overrunning our country with Third World misery until we too, become Third World.



It makes you wonder how such men as Orrin Hatch, Chris Cannon, Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi of California, John McCain, Kyle, Flake, Kolbe of Arizona, Degette and Udall of Colorado and others in our Congress find it their duty to ‘defend, protect, aid and assist’ this illegal alien invasion? These people in the halls of Congress were voted to represent American citizens. Instead, they pander to illegal immigration, corporations demanding ‘outsourcing’, ‘insourcing’, ‘offshoring’ and unlimited cheap labor.



Chris Cannon will be voted out of office because he isn’t serving American citizens in Utah or the rest of our country. As this immigration invasion worsens and our nation continues breaking apart by this ‘unarmed invasion’ that is fast Balkanizing us, voters will cast their votes for American patriots like Matt Throckmorton. It’s time we take back our country and not give it away to a loose and totally incompetent Cannon.



In the meantime, every single senator and congressman who supports this illegal and unrestricted immigration invasion into the United States had better beware. You either support American citizens or you too will be voted out of office because of your ‘unfriendly fire’. It’s killing this country.

Canada Recognition of Gay Marriage in Immigration Laws

Gay News From 365Gay.com
Canada To Recognize Gay Marriage In Immigration Applications
by The Canadian Press



Posted: May 19, 2004 8:02 pm. ET

(Ottawa) Canada's recognition of gay marriage is being extended to would-be immigrants.

The Immigration Department confirmed Wednesday that it has begun recognizing same-sex marriages in processing immigration applications. But the change only applies to couples in which one spouse is a Canadian citizen or permanent resident. It also applies only to those who marry in Ontario, B.C. or Quebec - the provinces that allow such marriages.

"It's encouraging to see the federal government follow through on its commitment to equal marriage," said Alex Munter, co-chair of Canadians for Equal Marriage.

"Same-sex couples have been getting married in Canada for almost a year. Legal recognition of those marriages is tremendously important, both for the couples and for the rule of law."

Immigration lawyer El-Farouk Khaki also hailed the change.

"This will improve the lives of loving and committed same-sex couples who want to live in Canada," he said.

"In today's world, it is not at all uncommon for Canadians and non-Canadians to meet, fall in love, and want to marry. If they are denied the ability to marry or denied recognition of their marriage for immigration purposes, their lives will be made unnecessarily difficult."

Part 5 Solving the Immigration Problem

Solving the Immigration Problem

Solving the Immigration Problem
Jon E. Dougherty, NewsMax.com
Thursday, May 20, 2004
Besides identifying the historical causes of mass immigration to the U.S., as well as the problems it has created domestically, immigration reformists say there is a number of steps Congress -- in conjunction with state and federal authorities -- could and should do to finally address.
But current policy initiatives, such as President Bush's "guest worker" plan, do nothing to stem the flow of immigration, legal or otherwise, they argue. Rather, such policies only serve to worsen the problem while undermining any efforts to control America's porous southwestern border.

It didn't start with President Bush, however.

NAFTA a Contributor

Some reformers and political analysts believe the immigration problem worsened after Congress and the Clinton administration approved the North American Free Trade Agreement, more commonly known by its initials: NAFTA.

Under terms of the agreement, which was made between the U.S., Canada and Mexico, barriers to free-flow of trade in goods and services vanished. So too did years of rules and regulations which helped protect American consumers.


As highlighted by columnist, author and former GOP presidential candidate Pat Buchanan, NAFTA has contributed to the food poisoning (and deaths) of American consumers, facilitated an increase in drug trafficking, and led to the reintroduction of diseases like tuberculosis that had long been eradicated.


Solving the Problem


But what to do about the problems? For one, say reformers, get the locals involved.


David Ray, a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), says the biggest impediment to solving the problem is "the indisputable absence of all interior immigration [law] enforcement." By that he means once most illegal immigrants manage to get over the border and into the U.S., they're home free.


In order to address the many aspects the problem that is mass immigration, Ray and other experts have identified a series of steps:


Narrow immigration to largely include only foreigners with marketable skills in the U.S., which would make immigrants less likely to remain poor and dependent on public assistance;

Implement verifiable documents that employers can use to ensure they are not hiring illegal immigrants or immigrants who don't have the right to work in the U.S.;

Implement laws so that employers who hire illegals run the risk of losing their businesses because of the government-imposed sanctions;

Place U.S. troops on the border with Mexico, to assist Border Patrol agents and other Immigration officials with closing off wide swaths of border;

Employ the latest technology in addition to troops and border agents, including motion sensors and detectors, satellite surveillance, and infrared technology, to track and intercept illegal border crossers;

Close legal loopholes that allow illegal aliens to gain footholds in the U.S., such as access to driver's licenses, matricular consular cards, and the establishment of bank accounts;

Make defense of the border "in depth," were it is nearly impossible to gain illegal access, then nearly impossible to get employment;

Enlist state and local police officers, during the normal course of their duties, to ascertain if persons are in the U.S. legally and, if not, detain them and call federal immigration officials to come and retrieve them;

The U.S. should get serious about incarcerating repeat offenders who are caught crossing into the country illegally—to encourage compliance with American immigration laws;

Deport illegal immigrants currently in the country, and provide them with instructions on how to gain access to the U.S. legally;

Begin to hold U.S. elected officials accountable for their mass immigration stances and policies by removing them from office;

Implore Mexican officials to develop the tools and policies to bolster infrastructure, education and opportunities in Mexico, so many of its citizens don't feel compelled to travel to the U.S. to earn a living;

Hold Mexican authorities who cross into the U.S. responsible for violating internationally recognized borders;

"The federal government is incapable of enforcing immigration laws by itself," said Ray. Washington needs help from the rest of the country. "There are only 2,000 federal agents to cover the entire U.S.; most states aren't enlisting local police to help" in the effort.

He said illegals know that once they get past the border, they are "home free," Ray said. "Through our lax immigration laws, we have invited anarchy into the United States."

Said President Ronald Reagan—though he also signed a landmark illegal immigrant amnesty while in office -- "The simple truth is that we've lost control of our own borders, and no nation can do that and survive."

Whether the 9/11 attacks, the cost of providing for so many immigrants, the loss of the American standard of living, or a total of these problems apply, mass immigration is a problem Washington has not dealt affectively with for decades, most likely because many see it as a boon to their careers, either through votes or campaign contributions from employers who hire cheaper immigrants.

In the long run, analysts believe, this lack of political resolve to protect the nation's borders will only worsen the country's political, social, economic and cultural divides.

Part 3Mass Migration Favors Democrats

Mass Migration Favors Democrats

Mass Migration Favors Democrats
Jon E. Dougherty, Newsmax.com
Wednesday, May 19, 2004
Immigrants have become a huge political tool used by politicians in Washington as benefactors for new voting rolls, as well as big corporate donors. But despite the leaders of both major political parties looking the other way as the immigration problem worsens, mass migration will likely hurt the Republican Party in the long run, say experts.
"Immigrant groups, like Hispanics, are seeing their political clout grow as members of their ethnic group grow in the country," David Ray, a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), told Newsmax.

"Your Wall Street Republicans see mass immigration as a necessary component to capitalism, that cheap workers are a necessity and even, perhaps, a right," said Ray. "Democrats see immigrants as the next group of loyal constituents."

Dems Favored by Mass Immigration

Craig Nelson of the immigration reform group, Friends of Immigration Law Enforcement(FILE) says, with a laugh, regarding the mass immigration problem, "you'd have to believe politicians are short-sighted, and only care about the next election."

"Karl Rove is no dummy," he said. "The White House knows about the problem. But what [Washington] is really concerned about is November rather than 2010 or whatever," he said, regarding the short- and long-term implications of mass immigration.

Other analysts say so much immigration is benefiting Democrats over Republicans.

"It would be unfair to describe immigration as a voter registration drive for the Democrats," says Steve Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies. "But it would also be inaccurate to say that it has a kind of neutral effect on the political balance" in the U.S.

"Immigrants are clearly trending towards the Democrats," he said, for three primary reasons.

For one, says Camarota, immigrants tend to be poor, which -- at least rhetorically -- plays into the hands of Democrats. "They have a more appealing set of policy options, so to speak, for immigrants," he told NewsMax. "I realize conservatives would counter, 'Yes, but our policies [of individual achievement and capitalism] are actually better for the poor,' and that may or may not be," he said. "I’m just saying the low income tend towards Democrats."

For another, immigrants "benefit from race and ethnic-specific policies" favored by liberals and Democrats, said Camarota. "Most notably, this applies to affirmative action, but there are others."

Third, "immigrants tend to gravitate toward their own leaders in America, and the immigrant elite -- especially Hispanics -- are overwhelmingly Democrats," said Camarota.

"If you look at the policies of Hispanic officials, intellectuals and journalists, they are overwhelmingly Democratic," he said. "If you found an 80-20 split [between Hispanic Democrats and Republicans], I'd be surprised. It's probably more like 90-10."

Ray agrees. "Many immigrants [who] arrive poor and have a hard time making it in America rely on the social programs that Democrats love to hand out."

In the Long Run

He says in the long run, mass immigration will favor Democrats politically, though in the short term, "it will favor the money interests of the Republican Party."

"The major miscalculation the GOP is making is that they're not going to be able to win the immigrant vote through family values," said Ray. "But immigrants, like everyone else, vote with their pocketbooks. As long as we keep selecting immigrants the way we are today, they're going to be overwhelmingly Democrats."

Analysts believe states that are up for grabs now politically -- such as Illinois -- will trend more Democratic as immigration increases the U.S. population in the coming years. Meanwhile, says Camarota, states "that are solidly Republican, such as Texas and Arizona, will go into play. It's not that the GOP will lose every time, but states that overwhelmingly Republican will, long-term, begin to shift" towards the Democrats.

Democratic states -- New York, California -- will remain solidly so, he says.

Ray says it would be better to select immigrants on the basis of they're being able to make it in the U.S. once they get here, and hence, "less reliant on public services."

Balkan American States?

These days, however, many of the immigrants—legal and illegal—come to reap the financial benefits America offers them (jobs, health care, social benefits) without burdening themselves with the task of becoming citizens.

Many of those that do remain insist so much on keeping their ethnicity, culture and heritage alive, they refer to themselves in a hyphenated sense -- Hispanic-Americans or Latino-Americans -- and work hard not to assimilate into American society, but to remain aloof from it. That has experts worried.

Some demographers and immigration analysts have suggested that as America dissolves into a nation not dominated by any ethnic group, cultural tensions could rise to the boiling point.

Other analysts say a society needs commonalities like language, customs, culture and history as fabrics to hold it together. Differences tend to segregate people, not unite them, which could lead to misunderstandings, violence and chaos, they argue.

"We certainly have never had the kind of immigration before that we have now," Camarota said.

Sam Huntington, in the current issue of Foreign Policy magazine, believes the current wave of immigration will eventually create two Americas.

"Continuation of this large immigration (without improved assimilation) could divide the United States into a country of two languages and two cultures," Huntington, a distinguished political scientist who heads the Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies, wrote.

Like Nelson, Huntington sees the current wave of immigration as unprecedented, especially in terms of numbers. European immigrations from the 19th and early 20th centuries also formed their own ethnic enclaves, but they generally dropped most of their ancestry -- including language -- and assimilated English and American-born culture.

But he believes the current wave of mostly Mexican Hispanic immigrants is different. "Demographically, socially and culturally, the reconquista (re-conquest) of the southwestern United States by Mexican immigrants is well underway," wrote Huntington. "Hispanic leaders are actively seeking to transform the United States into a bilingual society."

Others disagree. "Samuel Huntington is raising a legitimate question - it's just that he's wrong," Cornell University professor Victor Nee, co-author of "Remaking the American Mainstream," a study of immigration and assimilation, told the Chicago Tribune.

"I was shocked by its crudity, " Princeton University sociologist Douglas Massey, who has studied Mexican-American immigration, told the paper. "It's an affront to scholarship."

Part 2 Profit Motive Changed Immigration

Profit Motive Changed Immigration

Profit Motive Changed Immigration
Jon E. Dougherty, NewsMax.com
Tuesday, May 18, 2004
"America must not be overwhelmed. Every effort to enact immigration legislation must expect to meet a number of hostile forces and, in particular, two hostile forces of considerable strength," Samuel Gompers, founder of the American Federation of Labor [the "AFL" in AFL-CIO], said in a March 19, 1924 letter to Congress.
"One of these is composed of corporation employers who desire to employ physical strength (broad backs) at the lowest possible wage and who prefer a rapidly revolving labor supply at low wages to a regular supply of American wage earners at fair wages. The other is composed of racial groups in the United States who oppose all restrictive legislation because they want the doors left open for an influx of their countrymen regardless of the menace to the people of their adopted country," Gompers wrote.

Eighty years later, many immigration reformists believe Gompers' words were prophetic, as the U.S. faces a continuous influx of immigrants --mostly Mexican-born Hispanics who have come by the millions -- much as the country faced a similar influx of European immigrants during Gompers' time.

Gompers, who himself emigrated to the U.S. in 1863 from England, understood the cause and effects of mass immigration probably better than anyone else during his time. Yet for all his prophecy, his warnings have gone largely unheeded until today, when America is overrun with an estimated 13 million illegal immigrants.

Worse, more are on the way.

As Gompers anticipated, many come to America to find work. And, as the English labor leader predicted, their effect has been to entice corporations to hire them "at the lowest possible wage" because they "prefer a rapidly revolving labor supply at low wages to a regular supply of American wage earners at fair wages."

Demographics


According to a Census Bureau report released March 18, the nation's non-Hispanic white population will decrease from 69 percent in 2000 to just over 50 percent in 2050. Also, the population will age; 20 percent of Americans by 2050 will be 65 or older. As that happens, the working age population will have to rise in order to pay for Social Security, Medicare and other benefits for seniors.

Hispanic immigrants can help fill that gap, say analysts.

"The profound demographic shifts promise to redefine American society at every level — from the ethnic makeup of suburban neighborhoods to public education, elderly care and voting patterns," said an analysis by USA Today.

By 2050, Hispanics in the U.S. will swell to 103 million—nearly double today's figures -- to 24 percent of the population. Hispanics surpassed blacks as the country's largest minority group in 2002, with 38.8 million.

But other analysts see problems with so much population growth. Demographically, it could place major strains on the national infrastructure.

"America is in the midst of unprecedented population growth with major demographic consequences, and the most shocking aspect is that this is happening without public discussion or the approval of the American people," says Dan Stein, executive director of the Federation for American Immigration Reform.

"The government and the media seem to accept massive population growth as an inevitability that we are powerless to control. It is not inevitable; it is a choice that we are making through our immigration policies," Stein says. "Even worse, both political parties are committed to increasing population growth through higher levels of immigration and amnesty for illegal aliens.

"Massive population growth is not the future most Americans want for themselves and their children," Stein continued. "But it is the future that will be forced upon them by unwanted mass immigration that benefits a small number of special interests and politicians who cannot see beyond the next election."

Ethnic Groups

Most immigrants are coming from Latin American/Hispanic nations, say demographers.

According to William H. Frey, a University of Michigan demographer and scholar with the Brookings Institute, in the South blacks are the dominant minority group. But in the West, Hispanics dominate.

But overall, says the Newhouse News Service, in a July 30, 2003 interview with Frey, "Americans in ever-larger numbers are leaving most of the states that are premier destinations for immigrants and moving to Southeastern and Western states that are home to most of the white population growth in the nation."

"The pattern gathered substantial force in the 1990s and offers a revealing look at how the interplay of another decade of record immigration and the growing lure of a baker's dozen of fast-growing states with suburban appeal are transforming the nation's demographic landscape," Newhouse News Service's Jonathan Tilove wrote.

Profit Motives

"The influence of money and profit" in the corporate world "has influenced a lot" of the immigration influx, Craig Nelson, head of Friends of Immigration Law Enforcement, told NewsMax. Also, he said, reflecting on Gompers' words, ethnic groups within the U.S. continually push for more of their group to be allowed to come into the country.

"What was true in 1924 is true today," Nelson said. "Gompers was prophetic."

He said the proposal by the Bush administration -- to grant legal status to illegal aliens who find jobs in the U.S. -- was indicative of how the White House views immigration in general.

"We keep hearing [the proposal] was an outreach to Hispanics, which I find racist in and of itself," Nelson said, "but if that were true—and the plan was really just to go after Hispanics -- the administration would have announced the plan in September," just weeks away from the fall elections and in time for maximum effect at the polls.

"But January is the time [the Bush campaign] is raising money. So we think it's pretty obvious [the announcement] was made to secure campaign contributions, or bribes, or whatever you want to call them," says Nelson.

Nelson and other border experts also argue that a number of loopholes, coupled with political pressure and pressure from industry, business and ethnic groups, has made enforcement of current immigration laws a joke.

"The coalition to sort of weaken immigration laws and keep immigration high enjoys very little public support, but from an elite perspective, it enjoys a lot of support -- on the left and right," he said.

Still, argue immigration reformists, the nation's lax immigration laws and policies will most likely benefit Democrats in the long run.

Part 1 1970s Law Laid Groundwork for out-of-Control Immigrations

1970s Law Laid Groundwork for out-of-Control Immigrations

1970s Law Laid Groundwork for out-of-Control Immigrations
Jon E. Dougherty, NewsMax.com
Monday, May 17, 2004
"Illegal immigration is out of control."
That phrase was uttered by Leonard Chapman, commissioner of the old Immigration and Naturalization Service [INS], at a time when apprehension of illegal aliens by the U.S. Border Patrol had more than doubled, to 766,000 arrests.

The year was 1965 – a decade after Congress eliminated the "national origins" quota system with the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act [INA], and a decade after the measure's chief Senate sponsor, Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., said, "Our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually; under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same."

Kennedy's claim was either incredibly naïve or overly optimistic; according to the U.S. Census Bureau, immigration — legal and illegal — between 2000 and 2003 amounted to 2.3 million people.

The Kennedy-inspired initiative not only set the stage for a massive influx into the United States of immigrants, it also has changed the balance of power.

Decades afterward, millions of immigrants – legal and illegal – continue to flood the U.S.

The immigrant overload has been a boon to the Democratic Party – which is set to have an electoral lock on the White House if demographic trends continue.

What was it about the 1965 INA that has led to mass immigration nearly 40 years after its passage?

There are several reasons, say immigration reform experts, and most all of them can be blamed on federal government rule-making.

For one, says the Center for Immigration Studies, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank advocating immigration caps, the law created "a seven-category preference system for relatives of U.S. citizens and permanent resident aliens and for persons with special occupational skills needed in the U.S." It also established "a category of immigrants not subject to numerical restrictions: immediate relatives (parents, spouses, children) of U.S. citizens."

The law also limited Eastern Hemisphere immigration – China, the Middle East, Africa primarily – to 170,000 a year, while limiting Western Hemisphere immigration – Canada, Mexico, Latin America – to 120,000. But, CIS noted, "neither the preference categories nor per-country limit were applied to the Western Hemisphere."

There is another aspect as well. The law was passed in the midst of a civil rights struggle, "when an admission system based on national origins seemed out of step with national values," the think tank said.

Still, the core portion of the law that ultimately led to more immigration from Mexico and its southern neighbors had to do with changes in previous limitations on "core" family members. Says a CIS analysis: "The change to family reunification shifted the source of the immigration flow away from the developed, western countries toward the closer and more overpopulated developing countries."

The Future and Beyond


The INA did not remedy any immigration problems the U.S. was experiencing. In fact, it only made matters worse. Into the 1970s and 1980s, immigration – especially from regional Third World countries (which were largely Hispanic) – grew. The decade between 1980 and 1990 was the nation's second-highest in terms of immigration; some 8 million people came to America, mostly from Latin America and Asia.

"I guess if you traced the immigration debacle, you'd have to go back to the Carter administration, and the Reagan administration as well," Steven Camarota, a lead researcher for CIS, tells NewsMax.com. He adds that the immigration problem has only worsened since.

The Reagan administration led the next big change in immigration policy — one reformists believe was an even bigger mistake than the policy changes of the 1960s.

In 1986, Congress passed and Reagan signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act. One tough measure made it a crime for any employer to knowingly hire an illegal alien. But the law also granted an amnesty to all illegal aliens currently in the country, and it created a new classification of "seasonal agricultural worker."

Rather than solve the problem of immigration, the law only increased it. Formerly illegal workers who had been given amnesty and could now remain in the U.S. left the low-paying jobs they had previously filled. That left many unfilled positions, which meant a new crop of immigrants were needed to fill them again.

In short, the 1986 amnesty established a vicious circle of immigration.

Historical Failure


U.S. policies dealing with mass immigration have historically resulted in failure, which is why the problem continues to expand.

David Ray, a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), says that despite some politicians' best intentions, most immigration policies for decades were born to fail.


"If you start with the 'Immigration Reform and Control Act' of 1986, it was a bitter pill to swallow for those of us who believe in enforcing our immigration laws," he said. "The only way we were able to get laws on the books that fine employers for hiring illegal aliens – which was a first in American history – was to accept a compromise to grant amnesty for up to three million illegal aliens who were currently in the country."

That set a precedent for others, Ray said, that translated into this axiom: "If you sneak into the country, and if you're patient enough, eventually the government will cave in and give you [citizenship]."

After signing the 1986 amnesty law, President Ronald Reagan would declare: "This country has lost control of its borders. No country can do that and survive."

The immigration crisis didn't start with Reagan, and there were others who saw the problems mass immigration could – and would – create decades before today's reformists went to work trying to solve the problem.

Illegal immigrant's purchase of drug dealer's ID brings more trouble

Illegal immigrant's purchase of drug dealer's ID brings more trouble

Illegal immigrant's purchase of drug dealer's ID brings more trouble


The Associated Press
5/19/2004, 9:05 p.m. ET


WEST CHESTER, Pa. (AP) — An illegal immigrant who bought another man's identification ended up with serious legal problems when it turned out that the man he was impersonating had a felony record for dealing drugs.



Erick Antonio Marizan, 30, who is from the Dominican Republic, assumed the name Victor "Eddie" Padilla, of New York, after buying Padilla's ID.
Authorities say Marizan last year sold cocaine to an undercover officer in Chester County. Because officers first thought Marizan was Padilla, Marizan could have had years added to his sentence.

Sentencing was delayed several times because both the prosecution and defense needed to establish the defendant's real name. There were more delays this week when Judge Thomas G. Gavin accused the private defense lawyer of failing to represent Marizan properly and telling her to withdraw and return the $7,000 she had been paid.

Assistant District Attorney Charles Gaza said plea negotiations have started again with a public defender.

The New York Times > National > Youth Who Won Abuse Suit Is Held in Daughter's Killing

The New York Times > National > Youth Who Won Abuse Suit Is Held in Daughter's Killing

Youth Who Won Abuse Suit Is Held in Daughter's Killing
By ABBY GOODNOUGH

Published: May 19, 2004


IAMI, May 18 - At 16, Yusimil Herrera won a suit against Florida's child welfare agency for churning her through foster homes where she said she was beaten, slapped, kicked and sexually abused from the time she was 2. At 19, Ms. Herrera, a plucky young woman with dark, thick curls, had not seen any of the $2.2 million jury award and had drifted in and out of homelessness.

On Sunday, Ms. Herrera, now 20, was arrested on charges of severely beating her own young daughter in their North Miami apartment. Eight months pregnant with her second baby, she stands accused of the same cruelty that plagued her own childhood and made her a compelling symbol of the system's deepest failings.

The police found Ms. Herrera's daughter, Angel Hope Herrera, 3, lying unresponsive in the hallway outside her mother's apartment Sunday afternoon, with black and blue marks on her stomach, chest, arms and legs, according to the police report. She was airlifted to Jackson Memorial Hospital, where she was pronounced dead Tuesday afternoon, a hospital spokeswoman said.

Ms. Herrera, now charged with first-degree murder, was being held without bail at the Miami-Dade Women's Detention Center.

Peter Coats, a spokesman for the Department of Children and Family Services, said only that the department was "deeply saddened" by the "very tragic situation," that it was cooperating with the police investigation, and that he could not provide details of the case. But a state official said the agency's child abuse hot line had received two recent calls about Ms. Herrera - one in February, alleging that she had stopped taking medication for her bipolar disorder and another in March, alleging that she was hitting Angel.

The official said that in late March the agency asked Judge Sarah Zabel of Circuit Court for permission to take Angel into protective custody. But the judge rejected the request. A spokeswoman for the Miami-Dade Circuit Court declined to comment on the case.

Karen Gievers, the lawyer who represented Ms. Herrera in her lawsuit against the state, said in an interview that Angel was "a beautiful, healthy, happy" child despite her mother's hardships. She said that Ms. Herrera had recently married though was not living with her husband, and that she had appeared to be doing well when they last spoke in March.

"Nobody knows what she's been through," Ms. Gievers said of Ms. Herrera, who was placed in foster care at age 2 after her mother abandoned her and her older sister in a park, according to the suit. "She was beaten, sexually molested, battered with psychiatric medications that did who knows what to her brain. She was never given a complete education, never given independent-living skills classes that would have given her a smooth transition into adulthood. The state never gave her a family."

Minose Georges, who lives in the apartment next to Ms. Herrera's, said Tuesday that Ms. Herrera was extremely moody, did not get along with her daughter and rarely let her go outside.

"I saw her Saturday, like around 2 or 3, and she had blood all over her mouth," Ms. Georges, 22, said of Angel. She said that the child was telling her mother, "Mommy, I'm going to be good."

Ms. Georges said that when she asked about the blood, Ms. Herrera told her the girl had been biting her own lips. "Then she told Angel to wash her mouth," Ms. Georges said. "That's when Angel told me, 'I miss you, Minose.' "

According to the suit that Ms. Herrera and her sister filed in 1995, they were separated for most of the years they were in foster care, and Ms. Herrera was shuffled through 14 foster homes and institutions. The suit, in which the sisters were identified as "Two Forgotten Children," charged that the state had not done nearly enough to get the girls into good permanent homes or to prevent them from suffering abuse in unfit foster homes. Both were intermittently suicidal, it said.

"Nobody cares," the suit quoted Ms. Herrera as saying at 6, after being separated from her sister.

Ms. Gievers said that while a jury awarded each girl $2.2 million in 1999, four years after the suit was filed, an appeals court panel here overturned the verdict. Ms. Herrera settled with the Department of Children and Family Services last year, getting $260,000, Ms. Gievers said. But she ended up collecting only $80,000 after repaying the state for medical care she had received.

At a news conference sponsored by a children's advocacy group last June, Ms. Herrera spoke out about the difficulties that teenagers leaving foster care face. She criticized a new state law meant to help former foster care children succeed as young adults, saying it did not go far enough. She described attending eight high schools and said she had no job skills or home, according to an article about the news conference in The Sun-Sentinel.

The law, which required children to leave foster care at 18, provided a $900 monthly stipend to those who stayed in school and maintained good grades.

Gov. Jeb Bush has taken steps to improve the child welfare system, especially since a 4-year-old named Rilya Wilson vanished from her foster home near Miami in 2001. In particular, he has tried to reduce child abuse investigation backlogs and speed adoption of foster children.

"But we are still a long way from where we need to be," said Gerard Glynn, executive director of Florida's Children First!, the group that held the news conference last June. "So when we don't succeed with other efforts, we need to make sure we provide older foster youth with support to make sure they transition successfully into responsible adulthood. That was clearly missing in this case."


Terry Aguayo contributed reporting from Miami for this article, and Yudi Pineiro from North Miami.

Somali Bantu refugees adjust to their new lives in Pittsburgh

Somali Bantu refugees adjust to their new lives in Pittsburgh

Somali Bantu refugees adjust to their new lives in Pittsburgh
Another 160 due to resettle here over next 18 months
Tuesday, May 18, 2004

By Sally Kalson, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette



A new wave of refugees from the African continent has begun landing in Pittsburgh, having crossed eight time zones and a century to get here.


Martha Rial, Post-Gazette
Raqya Abdul Rahiman shows off her youngest son Jabril Muya, 8 months, at a welcome reception for the Somali Bantu families at The First Unitarian Church of Pittsburgh in Shadyside.
Click photo for larger image.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Related article

Help for refugees comes from variety of sources




Three families of Somali Bantus -- 21 people in all -- arrived in February and March, direct from the Kakuma refugee camp in Kenya. Another 160 are expected to follow in the next 18 months.

A persecuted minority in Somalia, the Bantus were barred from school and so are largely illiterate. All of them are Muslim. Most speak a dialect of Somali called Maay Maay, although some have picked up Swahili or English in the camps.

The Pittsburgh contingent is part of a much larger resettlement project now under way by the U.S. government to place 14,000 Somali Bantus in 52 American cities by March. More than half of them will be children under 17.

The first time most of them laid eyes on electric lights, gas stoves, flush toilets or television was at an orientation session in Kakuma. They've never touched snow, used a washing machine, shopped in a grocery store or handled a bank account.

Yet here they are -- two families living next door to each other in Lawrenceville and a third family in Point Breeze, trying to learn English, find work and settle into daily life in 21st century America.

A few months into his adjustment, Mohamed Derbane smiled with optimism in the family's Lawrenceville living room. Mohamed is either 18 or 22, depending on whether you believe his mother or his transfer papers. His limited English has made him the de facto translator for his whole family.

"You feel free here," he said of his new country. "At the beginning, everything is hard, like it would be hard for you if you went to Africa. Then you get a little used to it.

"Here we have hope to improve. We need to learn something first, then to work."




Martha Rial, Post-Gazette
Ibrahim Muya pauses while thanking the members of The First Unitarian Church of Pittsburgh for their support and friendship. At right during the reception stands Khadra Mohammed, of the Pittsburgh Refugee Center.
Click photo for larger image.







Acculturation has its bumps. Mohamed's family had lived only in huts before their arrival; multi-story buildings with steps were a whole new concept. The younger children at first were terrified to go down the stairs to the basement, where the only bathroom is located. And the trucks rumbling by close to the front door took some getting used to.

But these are highly motivated newcomers, said Peter Harvey, director of refugee services for Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Pittsburgh, which has the resettlement contract with the U.S. government.

"We were expecting people who were practically non-functioning, but our three families seem to be learning very quickly," Harvey said. "They value education, they want to work and they want their children in school. If this represents what's down the line for us, it will help a lot."

In addition to language, literacy, employment and housing, many of the new arrivals will have other issues: malnutrition and trauma from the camps; making the transition from a polygamous culture that practices female circumcision to a society where both practices are banned; moving from an agrarian way of life to a post-industrial economy.

"They are going to need help adjusting for some time," said Khadra Mohammed, who recently founded the Pittsburgh Refugee Center for that purpose. One of the region's few native Somalis, she also is one of the few who can speak with the Bantus in their native tongue.

"Self-sufficiency is more than a job and operating an ATM machine," she said. "They have to learn how their own bodies function, what's the difference between a virus and bacteria, how to administer over-the-counter medicines to their children. Of course they can learn these things, but it takes time and a lot of support."


History of hardship


The first group of Bantu refugees arrived a year ago. About 3,200 already have been placed in locations such as Louisville; Minneapolis; Charlotte, N.C.; Rochester, N.Y.; Phoenix; Tucson; Houston and Atlanta. According to the U.S. State Department, they are the largest cohesive refugee group presented for resettlement screening since the mid-1990s.


Martha Rial, Post-Gazette
Dadiri Salim, 18, dances while his other Somali Bantu family and friends, left to right, Zainbou Musa, Sowdo Derbane, Raqya Abdul Rahiman and Ralia Derow, sing during a reception for the Somali Bantu families at The First Unitarian Church of Pittsburgh in Shadyside.
Click photo for larger image.



All refugees have histories of hardship, but the affliction of the Somali Bantus stretches back more than most -- all the way to the reign of Zanzibar's Arab sultans in the 18th and 19th centuries.

During that period, their tribal ancestors were ripped from their native lands in what are now Tanzania and Mozambique by Arab traders who transported them to Somalia. Some were used as slaves, others were closer to indentured servants.

For 200 years their descendants remained there on the bottom rung, set apart by cultural and physical differences (other Somalis are taller and lighter-skinned), relegated to the most menial work, barred from school, land ownership, political participation and intermarriage.

Ibrahim Muya, 28, now resides with his wife, Raqya Abdul Rahiman, and their three small children in a one-bedroom apartment next door to Mohamed. He said life in Somalia was always harsh, with families working sunrise to sunset to raise corn, bananas, mangos and other crops.

"We were allowed one or two sheep for milk but were not allowed to own cattle," he said. "When we went to sell our harvest, we got a lower rate or it was just taken from us."

Then, in 1991, civil war broke out, driving thousands of Somali Bantus from their huts, one step ahead of marauding clan militias who stole their harvests, destroyed their villages and slaughtered heads of families.

"First they killed the elders to scare us, then they killed the stronger men and raped the women," said Mohamed's mother, Ralia Derow, 44, a widow with four other children.

"They killed my husband, mother and father in front of my eyes," she said, running a finger across her neck to indicate throat-slashing. "They just left the dead bodies lying there."

Mohamed said the clansmen beat his sister, Sowdo, who was a small child at the time. Then they broke his leg with a rifle butt. "I was lying there bleeding and screaming," he recalls. "They sat down in our house and made themselves tea."




Martha Rial, Post-Gazette
Four-year-old Fatima Madey, left, shares a meal of cornmeal, beef and vegetables with her mother, Ralia Derow, at their home in Lawrenceville.
Click photo for larger image.







The family fled, joining a mass exodus. They kept on walking until they got to the Dadaab refugee camp, just over the border in Kenya, where they were abused further by other Somali clans displaced by the war. There they languished for a decade.

On occasion, the men would slip out and make their way to Nairobi or Dar es Salaam, where they'd earn low wages washing cars or carrying heavy loads on their backs. Women stayed in the camps, spending much of their time in search of firewood for cooking subsistence rations. Rape was an ever-present threat.

"Life in the camps was much harder without a husband," said Ralia. "There was no work. The monthly rations were very little, and the black market prices were very high."

The United Nations High Commission on Refugees first sought to repatriate the Somali Bantus to their ancestral homes, but the modern-day descendants had no connection with Mozambique or Tanzania and those countries reneged on promises to take them.

That's when the U.S. State Department stepped in. The Bantus were moved from Dadaab to Kakuma refugee camp for immigration screening in the summer of 2002. A year later, the resettlement began.

For the most part, it's gone smoothly. Two towns -- Holyoke, Mass., and Cayce, S.C. -- rejected the Bantus before they arrived, in part out of fear of overtaxing their resources. But in both cases, neighboring towns stepped in right away.


Living in the city


The new arrivals to Pittsburgh will be placed in the city, not the Prospect Park apartment complex in Baldwin-Whitehall, home to previous influxes of refugees from Somalia, Sudan, Liberia and the former Yugoslavia.


Martha Rial, Post-Gazette
Teacher Art Powell, right, and fourth-grader Miguel Tucker watch as Hussain Derbane, 8, center, establishes a rhythm during drumming class at Miller Elementary School in the Hill District. Hussain, a Somali Bantu refugee, and his family arrived in Pittsburgh in late February.
Click photo for larger image.



That is by design, said Sister Pat Cairns, executive director of Catholic Charities.

"We want to diversify," she said. "In fact we have been encouraged to do so" by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

"It's hard on a community to absorb all the linguistic and cultural particularities. This is a way to disperse the load, by having various communities absorb them and their needs."

Housing is always the most immediate need of refugees. The Somali Bantus are being sent to cities and towns in "clusters," or extended family groupings that replicate the way they have always lived. The State Department's refugee office is hoping that families can be housed in close proximity, but it's not always possible; that's why they're resettling the refugees in a lot of smaller cities like Pittsburgh where people can get from one neighborhood to another without too much trouble.

At least 50 Bantus will be placed near one another on the North Side, in an apartment building that Catholic Charities is renovating. The organization bought the building in 2002. Work on the 12 units is scheduled to be completed in the next few months. Cairns said rent will be $450 a month for a three-bedroom apartment.

The language barrier is another difficulty.

"We have some staff who speak Swahili, but not Maay Maay," said Harvey. "We are still checking at the universities, but it's highly unlikely we'll find anyone."

Fortunately, English lessons are plentiful. The Allegheny Intermediate Unit provides free daily English classes for students from all over the world. Mohamed Derbane and his sister, Sowdo, have been attending Uptown classes regularly. Mohamed already has moved to a higher level; Sowdo (age 18 on paper but 14 by her mother's count), did so well that she now goes to middle school at Frick International Studies Academy in Oakland.

Three of the younger children ride the school bus each day to Miller Elementary, the school district's African-centered academy in the Hill District.

Dunya Derbane, 6, her brother Hussain, 8, and their neighbor, Mohamed Muya, 6, all share a separate classroom with their own teacher, Leonora Kiuuva, a native of West Kenya hired by the district just for them. They join the other children for music, art and gym.

"Our students have really embraced them," said Miller principal Rosemary Moriarty. "What they're coming from is almost a mirror of what our ancestors lived."

On a recent morning, the three Bantu children sat together at a table, dressed in the school uniform -- navy blue or khaki pants, blue, yellow or white shirts. They looked like any other children working puzzles and coloring pictures. Only their pronunciation gave them away as they repeated English words and sang with enthusiasm, "Now I know my ABC!"

"They're following along well," said music teacher Art Powell, after each child had been chosen by a classmate to join a conga line.

"It's still a bit of a wonder to them."

The same can be said of the adults.

"I saw many killed in front of me, many blood," said Ibrahim Moya. "Now I think I'm in a new life."



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Sally Kalson can be reached at 412-263-1610 or skalson@post-gazette.com.)

Lewiston schools 2nd in ESL population

Lewiston schools 2nd in ESL population

Lewiston schools 2nd in ESL population
Friday,April16,2004,9:55 AM
Email to a Friend Printer Friendly Version

LEWISTON (AP) -- Four years ago, Lewiston schools didn't have much of a program to help foreign students learn English. There wasn't much need for one.

These days, the city's English as a Second Language program is the state's second largest, with more than 300 students. Portland has the largest, with more than 1,100 students.

It used to be French was the major foreign language in the Lewiston area. But the city's ESL program now caters to about 320 students who speak 16 different languages.

There are more than 200 Somali speakers and the 24 Chinese students are nearly twice the French-speaking population.

And the city's adult education program has nearly 300 students who speak 25 languages and come from 42 countries.

Sierra Club Remains Nuetral

The Inyo Register

Sierra Club remains neutral on immigration
Immigration controversy brings out the voters in the recent Sierra Club election

By Emily Bazar
Sacramento Bee Tuesday, May 18, 2004 11:12 AM PDT






Immigration controversy brings out voters for Sierra Club election

Sierra Club members issued a resounding and decisive "No" to suggestions that they take a public position on limiting immigration, the environmental group's officials announced Wednesday.

Across the country, including California, a record number of Sierra Club members turned out for the annual election, one that promises to have a lingering effect on the organization and on environmental debates.

At issue was control of the group's 15-member board of directors, and whether candidates advocating curbs on immigration and other non-traditional environmental positions would prevail.

They didn't.

The five winning candidates were nominated by an internal Sierra Club committee, and espouse issues that have long been embraced by the organization.


Sanjay Ranchod, a consumer attorney in San Francisco, said he would like to use his first term to focus on global warming and over-consumption, among other issues, during his three-year stint on the board.

This year in particular, he said, he wants to expose what he calls the "horrific environmental record" of the Bush administration.

"Are members going to elect directors who want to impose their own agenda on the club? Or, are members going to elect experienced Sierra Club leaders who listen to them?" Ranchod asked. "The results today are clear."

But the debate about who controls the club isn't finished.

The election results already are being disputed, and could be overturned by a lawsuit pending in San Francisco Superior Court, said Marcia Hanscom, a current board member.

According to Sierra Club officials, 171,616 members cast ballots by Internet, mail and fax, representing almost 23 percent of the club's membership.

Californians, who make up the largest chunk of membership, made up 29 percent of the vote.

The top five vote-getters were Ranchod, Lisa Renstrom of North Carolina, Jan O'Connell of Michigan, Nick Aumen of Florida and David Karpf of Pennsylvania.

Hanscom, who has joined Club Members for an Honest Election, believes Sierra Club leaders unfairly influenced the election in favor of status-quo candidates.

She and others charge that club officials wrongfully used resources to bias members against independent candidates who got on the ballot by petition.

"It's very clear that while the election results have been announced, these may not be the results for the next three years," said the Southern California-based Hanscom, who is executive director of the Wetlands Action Network. "They'll be lucky if they even get seated."

Hanscom said the issue is not about immigration, it's about allowing members to challenge positions long-held by the group. She charged that club leadership used the immigration issue as a scare tactic to divert attention from independent candidates' attempts to move the club in a different direction.

"The (independent candidates) are for stronger policies than the club has been willing to take in the last 10 years or so," she said.

Frank Morris, a former executive director of the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, was one of the candidates who urged the Sierra Club membership to reconsider the issue of immigration. The membership voted in 1998 to remain neutral on immigration.

With 8,247 votes, Morris came in 15th out of 17 candidates.

On Wednesday, Morris, who is based in Texas, warned that conservation and population control are inextricably linked, and that immigration must eventually be confronted by the environmental community.

"Whether the Sierra Club ever deals with it or not, if you're going to deal with sustainability, you're going to have to come to grips with American immigration," he said.


IMMIGRATION: WILL AMERICA LEARN FROM ISRAEL? DEMOLISH MUSLIM HOMES = TERRORIST HIDEAWAYS By J. Grant Swank, Jr. posted May 19, 2004, 00:07

IMMIGRATION: WILL AMERICA LEARN FROM ISRAEL? DEMOLISH MUSLIM HOMES = TERRORIST HIDEAWAYS By J. Grant Swank, Jr. posted May 19, 2004, 00:07

GOP incumbents face challenges on immigration - The Washington Times: Nation/Politics - May 19, 2004

GOP incumbents face challenges on immigration - The Washington Times: Nation/Politics - May 19, 2004

GOP incumbents face challenges on immigration


By Stephen Dinan
THE WASHINGTON TIMES


Immigration is turning into an election battleground among Republicans, with several challengers running primary campaigns against leading congressional supporters of legalizing illegal aliens.
Rep. Christopher B. Cannon, Utah Republican and a prominent legalization supporter, failed to win 60 percent of the vote at a Republican nominating convention a little more than a week ago. Now, he faces a primary next month against Matt Throckmorton, a former state legislator who is running hard on the immigration issue.

"It's the biggest issue in the race, without a doubt," Mr. Throckmorton said.
Immigration emerged as an election issue particularly in California, where Arnold Schwarzenegger's opposition to driver's licenses for illegal aliens helped him win the governorship last year.
Now, the issue is playing a major role in some Republican primaries.
"What's really new is people challenging Republican incumbents," said Roy Beck, executive director of Numbers USA, an organization that lobbies for stricter immigration controls.
Although Utah might not be the most likely place for immigration to become the defining point, Arizona is an obvious target, where two Republican incumbents are fighting off challengers.
Rep. Jim Kolbe is being challenged by state Rep. Randy Graf, and Rep. Jeff Flake faces Stan Barnes.
Mr. Kolbe and Mr. Flake, along with Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican, are sponsoring a broad guest-worker program that would allow a path to citizenship for most illegal aliens in the United States, and Mr. Cannon has introduced a bill to allow illegal aliens working in some agricultural areas to gain legal status.
Those programs amount to amnesty for illegal behavior, say their challengers.
Utah's debate is slightly different than its southern neighbor, where illegal immigrants die in the desert trying to cross the border, saddle taxpayers with higher health care and education costs, and, particularly in Mr. Kolbe's Tucson district, tramp across ranchers' property day and night.
"Quite frankly, this issue has people down here pretty much just fit to be tied, particularly with the role the congressman has played in the past and the direction he's taken on the guest-worker bill," Mr. Graf said.
Toni Hellon, Mr. Kolbe's campaign manager and a member of the state legislature in Arizona, agreed that immigration will be the battleground issue.
"I think if it weren't for that issue, he would not be running, because he really has no other issue," she said.
But she predicted that Mr. Kolbe will win the primary because of his 10 terms in office, his senior position on the House Appropriations Committee and what he has been able to accomplish in adding more Border Patrol agents.
"I do not believe that a majority of Republicans will vote against Jim Kolbe on this issue," she said. "It is on their minds, they are aware of it, don't get me wrong, but I do not believe Jim Kolbe will lose a majority of votes because of it."
She said she sees "somewhat of a national trend" in the series of primaries being contested over the issue, but that what's new this time is that national advocacy groups, such as Numbers USA, are organized, are pushing the issue and, in some cases, are even running their own ads on the issue.
That's been the case particularly in Utah, where a group called ProjectUSA put up billboards with stark messages such as "Congressman Chris Cannon wants amnesty for illegal aliens."
That, and three days of radio ads paid for by the Coalition for the Future American Worker, for which Mr. Beck is spokesman, did have an effect, said Joe Hunter, Mr. Cannon's chief of staff.
Speaking before the convention, he said although immigration isn't the only issue in the campaign, they heard from people over the amnesty charges and had to craft a response.
"The more we talk to folks, the better it is, and they understand we're not talking about amnesty — we're not talking about bringing millions of folks into the U.S.," he said.
Mr. Cannon hasn't backed away from his plan, nor have Mr. Kolbe or Mr. Flake — but all three bristle at the notion that their proposals are amnesty. Besides, they argue, there is a need to fill jobs, and legalizing those who fill those positions is in the interest of national security.
"The status quo is not working. We have a system that's broken. The market is demanding labor, and that demand is being met by illegal immigrants, and we ought to have a system by which that demand can be met and, at the same time, bring illegal immigrants out of the shadow so we know who they are," Mr. Hunter said.
Mr. Kolbe and Mr. Cannon are still the strong favorites over Mr. Graf and Mr. Throckmorton, and Mr. Flake is considered safe in his race against challenger Mr. Barnes.
Mr. Cannon, for example, won 57 percent at the convention May 8 — just 3 percent shy of the 60 percent threshold needed to head off a primary.
Still, Mr. Beck said the results should shock legislators who support amnesty.
"The odds are still with [Mr. Cannon], given the percentage at the convention and he's an incumbent, but here's a four-term congressman who basically gets a 43 percent vote of no-confidence from his own party's regulars," Mr. Beck said. "For those of us who are making the argument to members of Congress that the fact that amnesties are being considered at all is a sign of great disconnect with the American population — this helps confirm that."
The issue also is playing out in open races, like the Republican primary for North Carolina's 5th Congressional District, and in general election races, such as South Dakota's Senate seat race between incumbent Sen. Tom Daschle, a Democrat and the chamber's minority leader, and Republican John Thune, and Texas' 32nd Congressional District race where two incumbents, Republican Rep. Pete Sessions and Democrat Rep. Martin Frost, were thrown together by redistricting.
Immigration-control groups have run ads in both of those general election races.

heraldsun.com: Latinos' dreams of education featured

heraldsun.com: Latinos' dreams of education featured

Latinos' dreams of education featured




BY BENJI CAUTHREN : The Herald-Sun
news@heraldsun.com
May 18, 2004 : 11:07 pm ET

DURHAM -- The cover of the magazine scheduled for distribution tonight during a presentation at El Centro Hispano sums up how it feels to be an undocumented immigrant living in Durham.

The image of an alien dressed like a middle school student next to an American flag was chosen by area Latino youths as a symbol of the daily struggle they face against stereotypes and language barriers.

They came up with the idea during an after-school program that lets Latino children explore their dreams about higher education. The program was created through a partnership between Jovenes Lideres en Accion, an offshoot of El Centro, and The Center for Documentary Studies (CDS) at Duke University.

The project, "The Dream Act: Portraits of Latino Youth Culture in Durham," let the students express themselves through documentaries. And the resulting series of presentations is aimed at raising awareness about the Dream Act, legislation currently pending in Congress that would make it easier for undocumented immigrants to attend higher-education institutions at in-state tuition rates.

If passed, the legislation would allow states to grant six-year conditional permanent resident status to students who have entered the United States before age 16, have been accepted into a two- or four-year institution of higher learning, have a high school diploma or GED, have "good moral character" as defined by immigration law and have no criminal record.

Johanna Franzel, a community documentary programs and documentary arts educator with CDS, said the presentation will focus on cultural differences between generations, common stereotypes and how Latino youths like to express themselves.

It will include slides made from photos that the students took of their families, schools and the places where they spend their free time, as well as interviews with Latino youths about what education means to them.

And "Vox Pops," a collection of two-minute audio snippets from question-and-answer sessions on such topics as individuality, self-expression and popular culture, will be played. The students also created the magazine, which depicts various aspects of Latino youth culture, including photo collages featuring such themes as "How I express myself," "What do you think are stereotypes about Latino youths?" and "What is your main goal?"

The students, who have been working on the project since February, also have been encouraged to take the magazine into their schools and communities, as well, to initiate a dialogue about the issues that they face.

"We're using it as a tool to put the pieces together," Franzel said. "We want to increase undocumented immigrant access to higher education."

Immigrants who are not U.S. citizens cannot apply to U.S. colleges before returning to their home country, getting a student visa and paying out-of-state tuition, she said.

Yesenia Polanco-Galdamez is a UNC student who has worked with Jovenes Lideres en Accion for three years. She hopes to encourage area residents to become active in pushing for the Dream Act, and build on the momentum created by "Latino Legislative Day," held in May 2003 at the N.C. General Assembly.

"This project is the first step in getting more youth involved," she said. "It will go as far as they want to take it."

---

What: "The Dream Act: Portraits of Latino Youth Culture in Durham"

When: 6 p.m. today

Where: El Centro Hispano, 201 W. Main St.

More information: Call 687-4635

Illegal Alien Shot in Texas - Thought he was a wild hog

MySA.com: Metro | State

Officials still probing border shooting death
Web Posted: 05/19/2004 12:00 AM CDT

Jesse Bogan
Express-News Border Bureau

EAGLE PASS —— More than three months after a hunter shot into the night and hit a Mexican immigrant, the incident is still under investigation.

Celestino Lopez Espino, 35, an undocumented immigrant from Central Mexico, died here Jan. 31 after a bullet from a .30-caliber rifle ripped through his abdomen and came out through a change of clothes he kept in a black plastic bag on his back.

Jaime Gonzalez, 35, of Eagle Pass, who has cooperated with authorities, told police he mistook Lopez for a wild hog after an unsuccessful day of hunting deer at Rodriguez Ranch south of El Indio.

While two people at camp prepared dinner, Gonzalez said he went back out around 8 p.m. to see if he could kill a hog because he heard a pack of them, said Maverick County sheriff's Sgt. Sergio Beattie.

"In the beginning he was looking through a scope, but he said it was too dark and then he just took a wild shot as they were scattering," Beattie said. Lopez was 129 yards away. The hunting party gave him CPR and rushed him to a hospital, where he died.

The district attorney's office has not presented the case to a grand jury.

District Attorney Roberto Serna said a decision in the case would be made in the next 90 days, "and not everybody will be happy with it, but it will be based on fairness and accuracy."

"It was not intentional, we know that," he said.

Across the Rio Grande, Claudio Bres, the mayor of Piedras Negras, said he was skeptical of Gonzalez's explanation.

"As somebody who likes the outdoors, it's really not a good enough excuse, and it's an insult to anybody's intelligence," he said.

"You don't shoot at the dark. You shoot at something you are looking at. There's no similarity between a hog and a human being.

"It's really a shame the way things are being handled," he added. "The justice system for so many months has not done anything."

Gonzalez declined comment through his father, who said, "He's just trying to forget everything. Me, too."

Lopez, a father of five who had worked illegally in the United States as a landscaper, was with about 12 others from his hometown near Victoria, in Guanajuato state.

One of two immigrants who spoke to authorities Feb. 18 said the group had heard hogs 15 to 20 minutes earlier but weren't aware of any nearby when he was hit.

"They saw a figure in the distance and they stopped. Then they heard a gunshot. Right after that they scattered into the brush," said J.A. Garcia, a San Antonio-based attorney representing Lopez's family.

Garcia said the district attorney is taking "a little too long" to push the case forward.

"It is understandable that they are upset," Serna said. "But we are not going to immediately make a decision without the facts of the matter before us."

He said the delay is partly due to the need to bring more witnesses from Guanajuato to give statements.

At least 10 immigrants have been shot in the Texas border area in the past four years.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
jbogan@expresss-news.net

Mexican Hospitals Complain of American Immigrants

The Brownsville Herald - Online Edition


Mexican hospitals complain of U.S. immigrants

By ANGELES NEGRETE LARES
The Brownsville Herald

MATAMOROS, 19 de mayo, 2004 — Bookkeepers at the Hospital General Alfredo Pumarejo have little hope of collecting the $380 bill left outstanding by a Houston man who was treated there weeks ago.

Hospital records show the man was taken to the Matamoros hospital after a car wreck that shattered his right leg.

The 43-year-old man was on his way to Monterrey when the accident happened.

Mexican surgeons put a rod in his leg and wired his broken jaw shut.

His hospital stay stretched over two weeks and included services and medications.

When he was well enough, the man left the hospital and skipped out on the nearly 4,000 peso account.

Mexican health providers have little or no resources to find the missing patient or collect for their services.

It’s not uncommon. Mexican hospitals absorb hundreds of thousands of dollars each year in unpaid medical bills owed by Mexican and U.S. patients that are considered “immigrants.”

U.S. hospitals claim billions in unpaid bills for treating undocumented immigrants and the indigent. In 2002, Brownsville Medical Center reported an average of $500,000 per month in unpaid services, attributed mostly to undocumented immigrants.

Like U.S. hospitals, Mexican hospitals do not require proof of citizenship or ability to pay in order to provide emergency treatment.

According to Matamoros General Hospital director Dr. Victor Garcia Fuentes, the immigrant and legal resident populations make up a growing client base that is filling emergency rooms in Matamoros but statistics are hard to keep.

“The number of U.S citizens and people from Brownsville is increasing rapidly, and we cannot say how many because we don’t ask them for their nationality, we’re not immigration officers,” Garcia said.



“If you asked any doctor here whether they’d like the U.S citizens to pay, the answer would be ‘yes’,” he said.

Tamaulipas Health officials said Matamoros and Valle Hermoso hospitals care for about 165,000 patients each year, of them 163,613 were uninsured in 2002.

Rising health care and prescription costs in the United States make cheaper services and products in Mexico appealing to U.S. residents, especially the uninsured, Garcia said. The draw means more financial risk for Mexican facilities.

Garcia concedes that quality — of facilities and services — fall short of U.S. standards but said that full effort is given to treating every patient.

“Maybe we don’t have the same quality when compared with the U.S. hospitals but we can tell you that we’re a modest hospital that meets a medical demand for emergency to surgical attention,” he said.

Officials at the hospital said they receive about $330,000 from the State of Tamaulipas every year to help pay for indigent care.

“Fifty percent of this money is for medicines, among others things,” said Sandra Armendariz, a hospital social worker.

“Sometimes the low-income families are exempt from paying the hospital for the medical services that we provide for them,” she said.

Armendariz said the hospital can not force people to pay and have no way to bill them. Detaining them at the facility is also not an option.

“We cannot do that, because is against the law,” she said. “If we try to retain a patient in our facilities it will be considered a kidnapping.”


ABC30.com: Hmong Immigration

ABC30.com: Hmong Immigration

Hmong Immigration
Fresno County leaders met on Tuesday to prepare for the challenge of meeting the needs of thousands of new Hmong immigrants.
About 15,000 refugees are headed to the United States, including about 3,000 who will relocate to Fresno County. At least 900 are children.

A special taskforce Tuesday presented four major challenges to the Fresno County Board of Supervisors. They include meeting the health, employment, housing, and education needs of the refugees.

The county health department is also setting up a refugee health screening clinic, and the Fresno Unified School District plans on setting up a center to help with student enrollment.

Coyote cunning

Coyote cunning

Colorful guests check into cheap Hotel Arizona in Mexico City

Colorful guests check into cheap Hotel Arizona in Mexico City

Mark Shaffer
Republic Mexico City Bureau
May. 19, 2004 12:00 AM


MEXICO CITY - No one here along busy Insurgentes Avenue can say exactly why the Hotel Arizona got its name back when this was a high-end tourist hub in the mid-1950s.

But Oracio López, a co-owner of the rough-around-the-edges six-story building, can give an earful these days about Arizona, the wide-angle shot of Monument Valley in the lobby and the huge tile mosaic of a desert scene at the front desk.

After all, López said, some of his best customers are Guatemalan undocumented-immigrant smugglers who use his cheap digs ($16 a night for a single, $18 for a double) as a stop off point on the way north while trucking their Central American clients to cross Arizona's southern border.

"I've even had Africans stay here who said they were heading to Arizona to illegally cross the border," said the 43-year-old López, who proudly displays two posters of revolutionary figure Ernesto "Che" Guevara and a calendar of Zapatista leader Subcomandante Marcos on his office wall.

Not that the Hotel Arizona doesn't attract legitimate business clientele.



Related link
• More about border security >>

Like Kameni Pierre, an artist from Zaire living in Paris, who on a recent stay was admiring a variety of tiny cactuses in a planter box lining the bottom of the picture window in the lobby.


'Cheap but nice'


"We are trying to open new markets for our products in Mexico," Pierre said. "This hotel is very cheap but nice and comfortable and is close to where we want to do business. I had heard about it even when I was back in Africa."

Which comes as no surprise to Irineo Judhó Martinez, who has been a bellhop at the hotel for the past 25 years and is like a walking textbook of the hotel's history.

Martinez said the original four owners of the Hotel Arizona, all from Spain and all now deceased, still owned the building, which was constructed in 1956, when he started work there in 1979. He returned to Mexico after a short stint picking vegetables in Texas.

"They never told me why it had this name," Martinez said. "But I think it had something to do with all the Western movies from the U.S. being popular during that time in Mexico and so many of them being filmed in Arizona. They were all fans of John Wayne and those kinds of movies."

During those days, the Hotel Arizona was right in the middle of all the tourist action, because it is only a block from one of the country's most impressive structures, the massive Monumento a la Revolución, which honors the Revolution of 1910 and the end of the reign of dictator Porfirio Diaz.

Martinez fishes out a postcard from his cubbyhole, located beneath a stairwell, of the hotel during its glory days in the early 1960s.

A fine-dining room was located on the fifth floor. Two theaters featuring live productions - now dank, grungy apartments - were on adjoining street corners across Insurgentes Avenue.

Two other multistoried hotels were just across a side street from the Hotel Arizona. But the area suffered a serious blow during the Mexico City earthquake of 1985.

Martinez said he had just come into work that morning when the earthquake struck and pancaked the two hotels, killing dozens. The two sites remain open lots nearly 20 years later.

"We barely even had a crack in our walls or foundation, and it knocked the two hotels down across the street," Martinez said. "That changed this whole area and the tourists started staying in other places after that."

Martinez also said he remembers only one regular visitor at the Hotel Arizona from Arizona in recent years, a businessman from Tucson who came to Mexico City every three months, "but I guess he retired because I haven't seen him lately."

Gonzalo Ramirez, a businessman from the Mexican state of Zacatecas, said the Hotel Arizona is well known in his home area.

"It's centrally located, cheap and clean. I think it is a magnificent hotel," Ramirez said.


An 'alternative'


Julio Gonzalez, a native of Guatemala City who works as a convenience-store manager in Miami, said he always stays at the hotel during his return bus trips to his home country.

"I don't have the money to stay at the Hilton, but this is a nice, cheap alternative," Gonzalez said, camera in hand as he set out to tour the downtown Zocalo district. "I wish every hotel cost less than $20 a night."

López, the co-owner, said he has plans to make the hotel even more Arizona-like, beyond the decorations in the lobby and the neon sign at night highlighting the hotel's name and a green saguaro cactus.

As he gives a visitor a tour, López notes that all of the aging, multicolored carpets in the hallways of the various floors will be replaced by a uniform Arizona desert brown carpet.

"But we're not going to be changing our original 1950s furniture," said López, holding a trash can covered by green vinyl. "That's the thing all our customers like."



Reach the reporter at (602) 444-8057.

The Sedalia Democrat Online

The Sedalia Democrat Online

Immigration paperwork clinic draws masses

By Beth Fortune
The Sedalia Democrat


A low murmur of English, Russian and Spanish filled the basement of St. Patrick's Church Tuesday as families sought help with immigration applications.

Legal Aid of Western Missouri, based in Kansas City, offered free help with citizenship, work visa and other applications to more than 100 people.

"Immigration is very confusing, very complicated," said Suzanne Gladney, managing attorney of Legal Aid. The application process for even basic forms is "fraught with potholes and pitfalls along the way that people can slip into that can hurt them."

Some of the immigrants waited more than an hour for their turn with someone to review their needs and offer advice.

"It's stacks and stacks of government forms and regulations," said Ms. Gladney. Some forms are deceptively simple -- the application for a work visa is 16 questions, on one page, but the instructions are 10 pages long, Ms. Gladney said.

Glenda Zelaya and her husband, Balthazar Aguilar, came from Marshall so that a lawyer could review Mrs. Zelaya's application for citizenship. She moved from El Salvador to the United States in 1995.

"I wanted to make sure I'm doing the right thing," she said.

Tracy Rubio, a U.S. citizen, came to find out how to begin to apply for citizenship for her husband, Javier, a Mexican.

"I think I would really need some help" for the application, she said.

She probably couldn't afford to hire a local attorney to help her, if she could find one willing, she said.

"Even if you can pay for it, there aren't enough people available to do immigration stuff," said Ms. Gladney.

Immigrants received help with filling out forms from employees of the office of refugee and immigration services of the Jefferson City Diocese.

"As we did refugee resettlement, we found that there were a lot of folks who needed help with immigration applications," said Alice Wolters, director of the office.

The office will follow up with each family, ensuring that they know when to go to Kansas City for interviews or when to file other forms.

Some Ukrainian families, who immigrated as refugees, needed to apply to be permanent residents.

Through the U.S. refugee resettlement program, resettlement agencies, which help refugees when they first move to the country, receive $400 per refugee, said Ms. Wolters.

The Jefferson City Diocese uses the money to rent an apartment, connect utilities, buy food and other basic necessities, Ms. Wolters said. That help is only given to families when they first move to the country -- if they relocate later, they get no extra funds, she said.

bethfortune@sedaliademocrat.com

IOL: Immigrant Council slams proposed citizenship referendum

IOL: Immigrant Council slams proposed citizenship referendum

Immigrant Council slams proposed citizenship referendum
19/05/2004 - 11:28:14

The Immigrant Council of Ireland has claimed that the Government’s proposed changes to citizenship laws would have a profoundly negative impact on the lives of children.

Sr Stanislaus Kennedy, the chairperson of the council, said the proposed citizenship referendum would create two classes of children in Ireland, with their legal position determined by the status or actions of their parents.

She said this would recreate the situation of almost 20 years ago when the children of unmarried parents were treated as second-class citizens.

The Immigrant Council is calling for a "no" vote in the referendum and has the support of former US Congressman Bruce Morrison, who believes the proposed constitutional amendment would be counter to the spirit of the Good Friday Agreement.



KRT Wire | 05/19/2004 | Experts say increase in temporary worker visas impacts economy

KRT Wire | 05/19/2004 | Experts say increase in temporary worker visas impacts economy
Posted on Wed, May. 19, 2004





Experts say increase in temporary worker visas impacts economy

BY KAREN BRANCH-BRIOSO

St. Louis Post-Dispatch


WASHINGTON - The Belmontes brothers - (KRT) - Jose, Andres and Alejandro - boarded a bus in Villanueva, Mexico, in late February, en route to $7.25-an-hour jobs with Loyet Landscape Maintenance in St. Charles, Ill.

They had one stop first: The U.S. Consulate in Monterrey, Mexico. There, consular officials issued them three of the 150 temporary worker visas that the U.S. Labor Department had approved this year for Loyet to fill with foreign labor. In doing so, the agency had to certify that the company - which advertised the jobs first in local newspapers - couldn't get locals to do the jobs.

The number of temporary workers Loyet has used has grown steadily over the years, and the company is not alone in making more use of the visas, known as the H 2B. The Labor Department approved more than 4,000 visa applications from Missouri businesses last year, and more than 2,000 from Illinois - many times the numbers just a few years ago. (Not all of the applications result in visas that are used.)

Nationwide, the certifications nearly quintupled in the past five years. This year, the program that was halted in March when it reached its annual 66,000-worker limit, provoking an outcry among owners of summer-tourism businesses that rely heavily on foreign workers.

Most of the visas in Missouri and Illinois are used to hire landscape workers. Yet thousands of others also brought in forest workers, janitorial and housekeeping crews, and construction and restaurant workers - many of the same types of jobs that illegal foreign workers are doing.

President George W. Bush and others have floated plans to allow more such workers to be in the United States legally, prompting a wide-ranging debate about the impact foreign workers are having on the job market, and on consumers.

Critics say employers are taking advantage of both legal and illegal foreign labor because they don't want to pay enough to attractive native workers.

"Our own home-grown labor is in such terrible straits right now that it's callous to bring foreign workers into their job market. This directly attacks the poorest of the working poor," said Roy Beck of Numbers USA, a Washington-based group that advocates stringent immigration controls.

Employers who use low-skilled, low-wage workers counter that labor shortages demand expanded access to foreign labor. Without that, they say, their businesses would suffer significantly - or go under.

"You can't just create human beings by paying more," said John Gay, co-chairman of the Essential Worker Immigration Coalition, a group that spans several industries, from landscaping to plumbing, hotels and restaurants and advocates expanded access to foreign workers - including the legalization of illegal workers already in the United States. "Demographically we are not producing enough people in this country to sustain the economic growth that we as a society want to have."

Russell Roberts, an economics professor at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va., said each argument has merit.

"I think they're both right," he said. "There's a little hyperbole on both sides. Obviously (employers) could offer more and get more domestic native workers, but the question is how much more? And if they did, they'd probably have to raise their prices and wouldn't get as much business ...

"And there's another, hidden effect: Companies would have less money to spend on something else, because they would have to spend more for landscaping. So there'd be less of something else. What would that be? I don't know. ... There'd be less work in other industries outside of landscaping because of these changes."

Few would dispute that the growth in the visa program has been a boon in small, poor Mexican towns like the Belmontes' hometown of El Salto. For as long as anyone can remember, men from the town have crossed illegally to work in the United States - and are still doing so.

But with stepped-up border security, crossing illegally has become riskier. Under the temporary-worker program, men like the Belmontes brothers can return to their families just before Christmas and get a visa with the same company the next year to go back legally.

Andres Belmontes, 44, first came to St. Louis on a visa with Top Care Lawn Service, Missouri's top employer of H-2B workers. The Labor Department has regularly approved the company for 200 visas a year. For Belmontes, the one that came to him after a recommendation from a friend in St. Louis, it was a way to provide for his growing family. That was something he could barely do back home as a police officer, a notoriously poorly paid job in Mexico.

"It just wasn't enough to keep the family going. I wanted to improve my life," said Andres Belmontes, who lives nine months away from his wife and three kids to work in St. Louis, sleeping on the floor of his sister's trailer in Fairmont City, Mo. As a single man two decades ago, he crossed illegally to work in a factory in California, and he finds this alternative far better: "It's easier with the visa."

The numbers of foreign-worker visas in such low-skilled work has surged in recent years, particularly since 2000. At the tail end of a decade of rapid economic growth, the native labor market couldn't keep up with the demand. But even as a recession hit in 2001, the numbers continued to grow.

Many attribute the rush for visas to increased immigration sweeps in the 1990s. Immigration agents arrested and deported 22 Mexican nationals who had been working with false visas for Top Care in 1992. And in 1997, they deported more than 50 illegal Mexican workers employed in St. Louis by the Brickman Group, a national landscaping company based in Pennsylvania. The company did not return calls for comment for this story.

"I truly think that when Brickman was raided, that was a wake-up call to all of the employers," said Susan Cho Figenshau, a St. Louis immigration lawyer who has helped several clients, many of them landscapers, to secure visas for foreign workers.

Arthur Carr, another St. Louis immigration lawyer, cited a more subtle reminder from the federal government. Clients started coming to him looking for visa help after many began receiving letters from the Social Security Administration that said their employees' names didn't match with the Social Security numbers they were using. In some cases, it was because their workers were using false documents.

Social Security Administration spokeswoman Carolyn Cheezum said that was not the program's intent. But the effect was real for companies whose workers couldn't explain the mismatch, particularly in 2002, when 950,000 such letters landed in employers' mailboxes.

The employers who have most heavily used the visas in recent years say they can't run their businesses without them.

Loyet's general manager Mike King said few locals, if any, respond to the newspaper want ads that he must run before he can seek foreign workers under the program.

"Out of 125 openings, I had nobody apply for that work," King said, referring to landscaping jobs such as mowing lawns, putting down mulch or planting shrubs. "The year before, I had three who applied for 125 positions - and they didn't work out. Of those three, one showed up to be interviewed and was hired. He stayed three days. The other two elected not to take the position. The work was too hard. It's very physical work."

Top Care general manager Rusty White said he has similar experiences. He believes the temporary nature of the work is a significant reason: "Not a lot of people are interested in seasonal jobs. They'd rather have year-round income."

President Bush's guest-worker proposal, announced in January, would allow millions of undocumented workers here the chance to qualify for three-year renewable temporary visas to fill low-skilled jobs that U.S. workers won't take. Workers abroad could also apply.

His proposal also would allow the temporary workers to switch employers in certain circumstances - a luxury the H-2B program does not allow. Under Bush's plan, for example, the 21 Nicaraguan janitors who were laid off at Washington University in November after three months on the job would have been able to stay in the United States and look for a job elsewhere. (The university's dispute with the contractor who employed the janitors led to their quick return home to Nicaragua.)

The president's plan has received a cool reception from some Republicans who argue it will reward those who came into the country illegally. Other Republicans and many Democrats also oppose the plan - because it doesn't give illegal workers a path to permanent residency in the United States.

Republicans and Democrats have offered several other proposals that would expand foreign-worker programs. Most do provide a path to legal permanent residence that can eventually lead to U.S. citizenship.

The one most likely to become law is a proposal that would provide for the legalization of 500,000-850,000 agricultural workers and the possibility for eventual citizenship. The measure has broad, bi-partisan support, but wouldn't affect millions of other illegal workers here.

Andrew Sum is an economics professor and the director of the Northeastern University Center for Labor Market Studies in Boston who thinks now is a bad time to allow more foreign workers into the country.

He believes that foreign workers were needed during the boom times of the 1990s, but that when they continued to be hired in the recession that followed in 2001, it put low-skilled native workers out of work.

"Immigrants have made major contributions to the labor markets, but we never varied our immigration policy when the economy hit its downturn. We kept allowing large amounts of immigrants to come in," said Sum. He estimates that more than 2.1 million new immigrants - legal and illegal - have joined the U.S. work force since January 2001, displacing roughly 1.5 million native-born workers.

"Basically the types of jobs they're taking is of native-born workers with very similar education," he said. "They face this enormous competition from less-skilled immigrants."

Morton Paglin, an emeritus professor of economics at Portland (Ore.) State University who has studied the underground economy, said many businesses that depend on temporary labor could suffer if they are forced to increase wages to make jobs more appealing to American workers.

"It's true if you paid enough you could evoke more of a supply of labor in the United States. But then the viability of the business is in question - or if the cost is pushed up, then demand goes down," Paglin said.

"For example, in the leisure tourist industry, the demand for hotel space is fairly elastic given an increase in price will increase the demand. People could go some place where it's cheaper. They could pitch a tent in a national park. If you pay the price you can get (native labor) up to a point, but what are the consequences?"

All of the economists interviewed for this article agreed that a decrease in dependence on foreign labor and the increased labor costs to lure native workers to the jobs would inevitably lead to higher prices for consumers. In Missouri and Illinois, that would likely mean higher prices for landscaping, hotels and restaurants and for produce in the grocery store.

Sum, the Northeastern University economics professor, said he's willing to pay more, but acknowledges most likely would not. "I think I am not in the majority. A lot of people want to get things as cheap as they can. When you're trying to do it by trying to pound wages down to the lowest common denominator, I consider it bad social policy."

Roberts, the George Mason University economics professor, sees the issue differently. He uses the example of the public disdain for Wal-Mart, which grew to be the world's largest corporation by cost-cutting strategies that depend heavily on paying low wages and buying many of its products from the poorest countries.

"A lot of people complain that Wal-Mart creates all this social change - and they say, `For what? Just for the low prices?' But for some people, low prices are really important," Roberts said. "I don't feel comfortable telling someone they can't save money. What right do I have to tell them that? This argument that says, `The companies can afford to pay more,' what they're really saying is, `Customers can afford to pay more.' But sometimes, they can't."

Gary Clifton, president of Ambassador Hospitality Inc. and Proline Management of St. Charles, has been using temporary-worker visas to employ landscapers and hotel housekeepers since 2002. The companies contract out the workers to landscaping firms and resorts that have trouble filling their seasonal jobs. He paid the 138 housekeepers and the 148 landscapers he employed last year between $6.74 and $7.89 an hour, according to Labor Department records.

He brought in 500 more temporary workers this year, he said. Clifton said he likes the sound of Bush's plan and others that would allow him to hire illegal workers already living here. While he must provide housing and transportation for the workers he brings from abroad, those foreign workers already living here would eliminate such costs.

"I think you would see a great reduction in the number of workers brought in because the ones here would be coming out from the shadows and would be free to move about," Clifton said.

"The down side to that is, if they're able to hop from one employer to the next. If someone down the street offers them 25 cents more an hour, you'd be out of luck. But then again, that's the American way."

thedesertsun.com | Governor likes life on the road

thedesertsun.com | Governor likes life on the road

LOS ANGELES -- Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger was in the closing minutes of a three-day trip to the Middle East and Germany earlier this month when he confided a single regret. He was disappointed he had to leave.

"I never want to be the governor that hangs," he told reporters at Ramstein Air Base near Frankfurt, shortly before he boarded his private jet for the flight home to California. "I like to do things. I have the energy and I have the enthusiasm."

It may not be long before the state’s celebrity governor is footloose again.

His administration is considering more trips abroad this year and is in the early stages of planning visits to Mexico, the state’s largest export market, and Asia, home to major trade partners Japan, China, South Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan.

With his swing through Israel, Jordan and Germany, Schwarzenegger made clear that in his view the reach of his office, like his celebrity, doesn’t stop at the state line.

His aides are confident no one is a more effective salesman for state interests, even if the taxpayer benefits of his first overseas trip are open to question.

"It’s important for people to hear the governor’s message" with the state hungry for jobs, trade and investment, said his spokeswoman, Margita Thompson. "It’s extremely important to do that not just domestically, but also in an international forum."

Foreign trade missions are a staple of state governments around the country. Nearly 40 states maintain overseas offices to promote trade, according to a 2002 survey by the Council of State Governments.

The Republican Schwarzenegger’s predecessor, Democrat Gray Davis, visited Europe, Israel and Mexico while in office.

No one disputes that Schwarzenegger, as an international movie star, is one of the most recognized faces in the world, an asset at a time when celebrities sell everything from prescription drugs to soft drinks.

Everywhere he stopped on his recent trip he was greeted by fans eager for a glimpse of the action star, an autograph or a photo.

"Whenever you see Arnold, you think of his movies. You don’t think of him being governor," said Staff Sgt. Lonnie Caballero, who turned out with his wife and son to see Schwarzenegger at the air base in Germany.

When he travels, "He’s projecting the image of California as a place that would be interesting to be in and do business," said George Gorton, a Schwarzenegger adviser.

Schwarzenegger was widely traveled before he became governor and enjoys it. Although the state has no authority in foreign policy, the governor has met with a string of foreign diplomats and has had invitations to visit more than half a dozen countries.

Schwarzenegger called his trip a success _ a "straight 10" in his words. But even those who have been involved in trade missions said the value of the overseas exposure can be difficult to measure and, in some cases, justify.

Former Gov. George Deukmejian, a Republican who opened five foreign trade offices and traveled to Asia, Mexico and Europe during his term, said his involvement encouraging trade was a boon for the state.

"The component of our economy relating to trade has continuously grown since those years," he said.

But when asked whether trade growth would have occurred without the involvement of the state government or his office, Deukmejian said, "It’s hard to say. I’m confident and convinced it helped."

Steven Maviglio, Davis’ former press secretary, said there is no accurate way to gauge the economic benefit of an overseas visit.

"It’s difficult to translate the message ‘We are open for business’ into dollars and cents," Maviglio said, echoing a familiar Schwarzenegger line.

California eliminated funding for its 12 overseas trade offices last year because of doubts about their effectiveness and cost, about $6 million a year. An investigation by The Orange County Register found that the trade offices -- with locations in Africa, Asia, Europe and South America -- took credit for $44 million in business deals in which they played little or no role.

The Associated Press reported this month that while Schwarzengger announced cutting deals with several Israeli companies to bring almost 1,000 jobs to the state, officials at those companies said they made their decisions without help from the governor or his administration.

The cost of Schwarzenegger’s trip, which included a retinue of statehouse aides, a personal friend and security officers, has not been disclosed. Thompson, the governor’s spokeswoman, said the costs will be split among taxpayers, the governor’s campaign funds and the Simon Wiesenthal Center, which invited the governor to Israel to celebrate the groundbreaking for a museum of tolerance.

Such trips "are necessary for the governor because almost every other state is out there trying to promote their exports," said Democratic strategist Garry South. But "in common parlance, they are known as junkets. I think voters are suspicious of it."

Immigrant Children Lacking in Services?

Porterville Recorder: "Children of immigrant families lack services
By The Porterville Recorder staff
Immigrant parents in California are more likely to be both married and working full time than native-born parents, yet their children are less likely to have access to health care and more likely to live in poverty, according to a report by a child advocacy group.

Nearly 185,000 children in immigrant families live in or near the urban areas of Fresno and Bakersfield, according to the report by Children Now. In Fresno, 42 percent of children live in immigrant families. In the southern San Joaquin Valley city of Bakersfield, 37 percent have at least one immigrant parent.





Statewide, 48 percent of all children have at least one parent who was born outside of the United States, according to the report.

The report says 84 percent of children in immigrant families have at least one parent who works full time, but just 43 percent of immigrant families have job-based health insurance, compared with 73 percent of children in native families.

And those children who have an undocumented parent are the most likely to be without employer-based health insurance - only 16 percent of these children of working parents are covered. "

Utah's Cannon Firing on his Own People

The Washington Dispatch

Utah's Cannon Firing on his Own People
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commentary by Frosty Wooldridge
May 19, 2004


It’s called, ‘friendly fire’ in the US Army when our own commanders or Air Force planes accidentally drop bombs on our troops. Nonetheless, death and destruction result to Americans in uniform. It’s the outcome of poor decision making, bad timing or wrong-headed thinking. American troops die by the hands of inept leaders. But the one tragedy about ‘friendly fire’ stems from the fact of wartime trauma. Split second decisions must be made in the face of conflict.



But what is happening to America today is worse. Our own elected officials in Congress proceed with an agenda that aims the deadly guns of immigration with point blank salvos into the heart of America’s mid section. We’re bleeding from one end of the country to the other. California is just about dead. New York City is turning into a polyglot of the Third World. Miami is more Cuban than American and Georgia is an extension of Mexico City. Texas? No one speaks English.



Such are the results of congressional representatives like Chris Cannon of Utah and many others. In the past decade, Cannon, a Republican stood as one of the foremost champions of illegal immigration into America. He introduced every bill possible to aid, assist, abet and encourage illegal immigration into the United States. Today, Utah is over-run with an estimated 65,000 illegal aliens costing Utah taxpayers millions of dollars. Their schools suffer language crisis and medical problems beyond solving.



Aiding and abetting illegal aliens stands in violation of federal immigration laws. But that hasn't stopped men like Cannon from firing on his own people. It hasn’t stopped Senator Orrin Hatch, McCain, Kennedy and dozens of others in our Congress. It’s why we have 13 million illegal aliens free to roam about our country. It’s why we’re in a crisis that will prove more deadly and devastating than ten 9/11’s.



However, last week, Cannon failed to win the nomination for his House seat against Matt Throckmorton. It was called a ‘shocker’ by the Salt Lake City Deseret News.



Why is Cannon in trouble? Could it be he is currently sponsoring five illegal alien amnesty bills that pander to an outlaw constituency? What about the fact that PACs have kicked in $195,188.00 to keep Cannon firing into his own people? Those PACs represent industries that profit from Cannon’s interpretation of the word ‘amnesty’ or by his efforts to raise import quotas on foreign labor like H-1B and L-1 visas. His is the worst type of ‘friendly fire’.



But Cannon’s greatest troubles come from his own gun shooting himself in his own foot.

Cannon, with eight years in Congress, is a member of the Judiciary Committee’s immigration subcommittee. He blocked all legislation to crack down on illegal immigration. He is the darling of the national immigration lawyers association and the Mexican-American Legal Defense Fund. He was celebrated by MALDF, which is one of the most anti-American advocacy groups in the United States. That organization is bent on returning Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California into Mexico as part of their ‘Aztlan Reconquista’. Cannon praised Mexico because it has quadrupled its population in his lifetime. He advocates higher population growth and thinks it is vital to bring in as many immigrants as possible.



It makes you wonder if he possesses the intellectual capacity to understand such a stance, given time, would make America like India, China and Bangladesh. What is the point of that human train wreck relocating in America?



As Lincoln said, “You can fool some of the people some of the time and you can fool all of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all the people all of the time.” Cannon’s latest AgJobs amnesty bill shoots Utah voters with a gut shot. Utah voters shot back with votes for Matt Throckmorton.



Cannon would love flooding Utah with an added 100,000 even 500,000 immigrants. He does not understand limits. If Cannon had his way, he’d open up immigration floodgates to the world. Not only would he create water shortages, language chaos, medical mayhem from illegal aliens--Chris Cannon would kill what it means to be an American citizen. He is in favor of overrunning our country with Third World misery until we too, become Third World.



It makes you wonder how such men as Orrin Hatch, Chris Cannon, Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi of California, John McCain, Kyle, Flake, Kolbe of Arizona, Degette and Udall of Colorado and others in our Congress find it their duty to ‘defend, protect, aid and assist’ this illegal alien invasion? These people in the halls of Congress were voted to represent American citizens. Instead, they pander to illegal immigration, corporations demanding ‘outsourcing’, ‘insourcing’, ‘offshoring’ and unlimited cheap labor.



Chris Cannon will be voted out of office because he isn’t serving American citizens in Utah or the rest of our country. As this immigration invasion worsens and our nation continues breaking apart by this ‘unarmed invasion’ that is fast Balkanizing us, voters will cast their votes for American patriots like Matt Throckmorton. It’s time we take back our country and not give it away to a loose and totally incompetent Cannon.



In the meantime, every single senator and congressman who supports this illegal and unrestricted immigration invasion into the United States had better beware. You either support American citizens or you too will be voted out of office because of your ‘unfriendly fire’. It’s killing this country.



Salvation Army in Louisiana Mystified by Chinese Immigrant

Welcome to TimesDaily.com: "Salvation Army workers have a mystery living in their midst.

Officials are trying to learn as much as they can about a Chinese man who was brought to one of the charity's shelter earlier this month following his release from immigration custody.

Aside from some names and a sketchy story involving a restaurant in New Orleans, the shelter has few clues about how to reunite the man with his family.

Workers believe the man's name is Zhou Yi, but he speaks no English and appears to have some mild retardation, The Gadsden Times reported. The 21-year-old man may have family in New Orleans, but no one is positive.

'I can't imagine being in a foreign country, not being able to understand what anyone around you was saying,' said Kathy Willis, who has tried to communicate with the man.

Zhou had been in the custody of the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service since September when he was released from the Etowah County jail on May 7 and taken to the Salvation Army shelter.

INS officials tried to use an interpreter by telephone to communicate with Zhou - listed by the INS as Chou Yi - but the interpreter couldn't understand him. Another Chinese detainee also tried to talk with him but couldn't, an INS official said.

Willis, Monza Miller and Steve Minton began looking for ways to communicate with Zhou.

Minton faxed a letter to the Chinese consulate in Houston and contacted the Chinese embassy in Washington, D.C., but neither office was able to help.

The first real break came last week when Ana Liang, a student at Gadsden State Community College, was able to talk to Zhou. Staff members of U.S. Rep. Robert Aderholt's office also got involved and got a Chinese interpreter from Birmingham in touch by phone.

Th"

Immigration Officials Probe Smuggling Case

Press-Telegram - PM Updates: "Immigration officials probe smuggling case
By Jason Kandel
Staff Writer
CANOGA PARK - U.S. Immigration officials today were probing the backgrounds of two men and a woman detained during a immigrant smuggling case in which 76 people were found crammed inside a two-bedroom house.
Police found the immigrants about 9:30 p.m. Monday, sitting barefoot on the floor of the home in the 7300 block of Loma Verde Avenue.
'It was hot, smelly. The conditions were bad,' said LAPD Lt. Carlos Velez.
The 62 males and 14 females - the youngest was a 14-year-old boy - had been inside the padlocked house for two days. They survived on instant soup, chips and cookies, and water and soda, police said."

A Plan to Liberate Brazil

Brazil - Brasil - BRAZZIL - News from Brazil - A Plan to Liberate Brazil - Brazilian and USA - May 2004: "Let's Just Invade Brazil!
A military invasion to liberate Brazil and the entire region would
do so much good. Here is a land of tin-pot dictators and ruling
juntas that go back decades, even centuries. True, some of the
dictators and would-be dictators rule under the veneer of democracy,
but the same families remain in control election after election.
Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.

The war boosters say things about Iraq and the Arab world that are undeniably true. But, you know, there are other regions that are deeply troubled and in need of wholesale reconstruction by the United States. Peggy Noonan says we shouldn't stop with Iraq; we should 'reorder the world.'
OK. In particular, Latin America needs addressing. Brazil has already admitted that it is engaged in a broad range of nuclear research. The government says it does not plan to actually make them, but we've heard that one before.
Are we going to sit idly by as Brazil continues to research and eventually manufacture nukes, exporting them to their friends in Cuba, or are we going to act preemptively to arrest this threat? A recent string of leftist electoral victories demonstrate that this whole continent is a hotbed of anti-Americanism.
A military invasion to liberate Brazil and the entire region would do so much good. Here is a land of tin-pot dictators and ruling juntas that go back decades, even centuries. True, some of the dictators and would-be dictators rule under the veneer of democracy, but the same families remain in control election after election.
Corruption is ubiquitous and their constitutions are a joke. Opposition leaders are routinely rubbed out. Torture and police killings are routine. When people try to fl"

Reuters AlertNet - US House rejects hospital checks on illegal aliens

Reuters AlertNet - US House rejects hospital checks on illegal aliens: "US House rejects hospital checks on illegal aliens
18 May 2004 20:07:10 GMT

WASHINGTON, May 18 (Reuters) - A bill that would have required emergency rooms to check on patients' immigration status and report illegal aliens to authorities for deportation was soundly defeated on Tuesday by the House of Representatives.
The bill sponsored by California Republican Rep. Dana Rohrbacher was defeated by a 331-88 vote, with most Republicans joining all but two Democrats to kill it.
Maryland Democrat Steny Hoyer, an opponent of the bill, said the legislation would 'require health care providers to turn into immigration officer' and possibly create public health risks if people didn't get needed health care. The information would go to the Department of Homeland security.
Rohrbacher said deporting illegal aliens was 'only common sense.'
'If we know that an illegal alien is in the United States, especially one that is consuming resources that are taking health care resources away from our people, they should be deported; and their own country should be taking care of them,' he said."

Phoenix immigration crackdown results in more activity in Tucson

Phoenix immigration crackdown results in more activity in Tucson: "The government is going to expand a crackdown targeting violent criminal groups involved in immigrant smuggling.
The crackdown was launched roughly eight months ago in Phoenix, a hub for transporting immigrants from Mexico and elsewhere in Latin America to other cities.
Immigration officials say the pressure has forced some smugglers to pick up and move their businesses.
They say the groups now are operating in cities that generally haven't served as stopover points for illegal immigrants, such as Los Angeles, Houston and Tucson, Arizona. "

Mexican Immigrant Children get Lead Poisoning from Eating Grasshoppers

Berkeley Daily Planet
Berkeley Daily Planet
Edition Date: Tuesday, May 18, 2004

Article
Back to Mainpage

Index of Sections

State Misses Lead Poisoning’s New, Immigrant Face
By Mary Jo McConahay Pacific News Service (05-18-04)

SEASIDE, Calif.—Elevated levels of toxic lead are being found in the blood of children at a small airy clinic in this central coastal town of 33,450 people. The culprit may be grasshoppers captured 2,000 miles away in Mexican villages, lovingly fried with garlic, salt and lime and sent by the pound in care packages to family members here.
Medics say the calamity illustrates how dangerously stuck in the past public health care may be, in an increasingly borderless world, and in a state where more than a quarter of the population is foreign-born.

“We all grew up there eating the grasshoppers and other things and nothing happened,” puzzled Minerva, who prepared lunch one recent afternoon for three of her own children and a niece in a small, trim house cooled by an ocean breeze. Like most newcomers here, Minerva’s husband, sister, and brother-in-law—who share the house—and her immigrant neighbors, all work in laundry, hotel-maid and other service jobs in nearby, wealthier towns like Monterey and Pebble Beach. Minerva’s healthy-looking 9-year-old daughter chatters in English as she wolfs down tostadas at the table with the other kids. She was among those found with dangerously high lead levels at a routine screening at the Seaside Family Health Center.

Seventy-five percent of lead poisoning cases statewide in the last three years have been Latino children. Recent investigative news reports point to Mexican candy as one source. In November, because of the Seaside cases, State Health Director Diana M. Bont warned pregnant women and children especially against the grasshoppers treat. But community health workers say such developments mean lead poisoning has a new, inadequately recognized face. And they point to special challenges in reaching indigenous immigrants—increasing in number—who may be distrustful of doctors, illiterate or, like members of Minerva’s family, undocumented.

“New solutions are needed because old ones won’t work,” said Dr. Margaret Handley of UCSF’s Department of Family Medicine, who is investigating the local outbreak. Through careful conversation with mothers over the months, a Spanish-speaking nurse, Celeste Hall, and the clinic’s Dr. Eric Sanford determined children born in two Zapotec Indian villages in the southern state of Oaxaca—or U.S.-born children whose parents came from the villages—were the ones testing high for lead. Other immigrant kids did not. Virtually all public service health education literature in California about lead poisoning—even in Spanish—refers to old paint as the source, but that was ruled out after inspections.

Local and state health departments were slow-moving and strapped for funds. Sanford and Hall spent their own time and money trying to track the poisoning source. One suspect was a distinctive green-glazed Oaxacan pottery found in Seaside homes. But even if families used the pottery for food, it would produce a steady, low level of exposure, not spikes as seen here; moreover, the pottery is universally used by regional immigrants, and only patients linked to the two villages exhibited high lead levels.

“The children’s levels are either low or off the charts, so it’s acute exposure we’re looking at,” said Sanford, who does believe Oaxaca is the source of the poisoning. One child’s level jumped from two micrograms per deciliter to 35 after eating the grasshoppers. Levels above 10 are considered high. Sanford and Hall also sent other foods for testing that came from the villages—favorites tamarind candy, pumpkin seeds, chocolate and tortillas—and some were contaminated. They went to Handley, an epidemiologist.

Like a detective, Handley pursued leads. One breakthrough document: a British study on plants and animal life that developed amid old mine tailings in Wales and Ireland. “A highly significant relationship” existed between lead contaminated grass and grasshoppers around the abandoned mines, researchers wrote. Grasshoppers can carry high concentrations of the metal without being fatally poisoned.

Dozens of gold and silver mines once flourished around the home villages of the Seaside immigrants. Owned by American and other companies, they are abandoned now. Lead is a by-product of extraction and processing.

With cross-border traffic constant and fast, there has been no loss of access to native foods for California’s newest immigrants. A single tortilla fresh from Oaxaca can sell in this town for $1, but most of the homemade favorites come by relatives or paid carriers in a deep and wide courier network. But without a full-blown investigation, it is difficult to pin down the source of the lead poisoning precisely. And community health workers say any heavy-handed official attack on the traditional foods from home would be wrong and counterproductive.

At the Seaside clinic, poisonous levels in children’s blood continue to turn up around once a week, month after month. Lead poisoning can lead to learning disabilities, diminished IQ, impaired motor development, and anti-social behavior. Because there is no signal event—no rash or fever, no sudden collapse—it is difficult to convince some parents a child is endangered.

“We need to do a full-on investigation like we’d do with any other epidemic outbreak,” Handley says. “Would this get more attention if these kids were in Pebble Beach?”

Meanwhile, the longer they cannot absolutely determine the poisoning source, the more the trust that Sanford and Hall clearly maintain on a personal level with the Seaside immigrant community is tested. Hall, who is married to a Zapotec from one of the host Mexican villages, says her family will lay off of grasshoppers. Minerva’s family may not.

“Why do anything different if no one is sure?” asked Minerva.


PNS contributor Mary Jo McConahay is a writer and filmmaker with extensive experience in Latin America.

WOAI: SAN ANTONIO//NEWS

WOAI: SAN ANTONIO//NEWS: "Trial Following Immigrant Deaths Postponed
LAST UPDATE: 5/19/2004 5:56:15 AM
Posted By: Walker Robinson
The first trial related to the nation's deadliest human smuggling attempt was delayed indefinitely on Tuesday.
Just before jury selection in the trial of Erica Cardenas was to begin, U.S. District Judge Vanessa Gilmore granted prosecutors' request for postponement.
Cardenas is charged with extorting money for the safe return of a then 3-year-old Honduran boy whose mother survived the smuggling attempt that left 19 illegal immigrants dead.
Nancy Herrera, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney's Office, would not comment on reasons for the delay or when the trial might be rescheduled. Gilmore has told attorneys in the case not to speak with the media.
The case was the first scheduled for trial in the smuggling attempt, in which 17 people were found dead in a trailer at a truck stop near Victoria on May 14, 2003. Two died later.
They were among more than 70 immigrants packed into a hot, stifling trailer. The victims died from dehydration, hyperthermia and suffocation. Temperatures inside the trailer reached 173 degrees.
Cardenas, along with her boyfriend, Juan Carlos Don Juan, are accused of trying to extort between $1,300 and $1,500 for the return of the boy. Don Juan, 22, pleaded guilty in March and faces up to 10 years in prison.
Neither Cardenas nor Don Juan were charged with conspiracy because they were not directly involved in the smuggling ring, officials said. Gilmore earlier ruled the charges involving Cardenas are unrelated to the deaths.
The delay came a day after Gilmore barred prosecutors from using allegedly incriminating statements Cardenas made during an interview with authorities.
She allegedly admitted"

KOBTV.com - Brothers face charges in immigrant�s death

KOBTV.com - Brothers face charges in immigrant�s death: "Brothers face charges in immigrant�s death




Last Update: 05/19/2004 8:48:59 AM
By: Associated Press


(Deming-AP) -- Two Mexican brothers are being held in the death of a 32-year-old Mexican woman who collapsed in the desert near Columbus.
The death of the woman was the first documented death of an illegal immigrant in New Mexico this year.
Border Patrol spokesman Doug Mosier says 27-year-old Humberto Chavira Ordones and 26-year-old Baldomero Chavira Ordones face smuggling resulting in death charges.
The woman�s name is being withheld because her family has not been notified.
She was found Friday afternoon on a county road in southern Luna County after a member of her group notified a rancher. She died en route to the hospital.
A Border Patrol helicopter helped agents track 13 other immigrants in the desert from footprints found where the woman was left.
"